Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 11-22.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.02.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

What is Technology Governance?

YAN Chang-wu, YANG Zheng-yuan   

  1. School of Public Administration, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Received:2019-12-14 Published:2020-04-20

Abstract: “Technology governance” is a term that is “being used” rather than “being understood”. To understand it, we should first answer the question “what is technology?” Technology is an autonomous tool, and its core is a kind of knowledge, a kind of rational human intellectual achievement. Its extension includes “hard” tools in engineering sense and “soft” tools in social sense. The term bears four implications: an object, a means, a mechanism, and a concept, of governance. And it has much in common with public administration as both take technical rationality as their basis. The latter appeared initially as a means of governance, and later from it derived "technology governance" as a mechanism of governance, but its core remains technological as a governance concept. Since the reform and opening up, China’s governance practice has undergone a transformation from overall control to technology governance, featuring mainly technically.

Key words: technology, technology governance, public administration

CLC Number: 

  • D035-3
[1] 刘秀秀.新时代国家治理中技术治理的双重维度及其出路[J].行政管理改革,2019(5):65-70.
[2] 颜昌武.行政国家:一个基本概念的生成及其蕴涵[J].公共行政评论,2018(3):120-136.
[3] [法]布罗代尔.资本主义的动力[M].杨起,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
[4] [德]拉普.技术哲学导论[M].刘武,等译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.
[5] Jacques Ellul. The Technological Society[M]. NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964,p.x.
[6] WIPO. Licensing Guide For Developing Countries[R]. Geneva: WIPO, 1977,p.28.
[7] [德]马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[8] 王伯鲁.技术究竟是什么[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[9] 刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[10] [美]阿瑟.技术的本质:技术是什么,它是如何进化的[M].曹东溟,等译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2014.
[11] [美]格里芬.后现代精神[M].王成兵,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
[12] [德]马克思.1844年经济学—哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.
[13] [美]麦克莱伦第三,多恩.世界史上的科学技术[M].王鸣阳,译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2003.
[14] [法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学[M].董茂永,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[15] 姜海波.马克思《哲学的贫困》研究读本[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2013.
[16] [美]温纳.自主性技术[M].杨海燕,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[17] John Galbratith.The New Industrial State[M].NY: The New American Library,1968.
[18] 何亮.盘点2018年十大数据泄露事件[J].计算机与网络,2019(2):56-57.
[19] 张丙宣.技术治理的两幅面孔[J].自然辩证法研究,2017(9):27-32.
[20] 解胜利,吴理财.从“嵌入-吸纳”到“界权-治理”:中国技术治理的逻辑嬗变——以项目制和清单制为例的总体考察[J].电子政务,2019(12):95-107.
[21] 渠敬东.项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学,2012(5):113-130.
[22] 石亚军,王琴.完善清单制:科学规范中的技术治理[J].上海行政学院学报, 2018(6):55-63.
[23] [德]阿伦特.黑暗时代的人们[M].王凌云,译.南京:江苏教育出版社,1998.
[24] 刘永谋.技术治理的逻辑[J].中国人民大学学报, 2016(6):118-127.
[25] [美]怀特,亚当斯.公共行政研究:对理论与实践的反思[M].刘亚平,高洁,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[26] Woodrow, W. The Study of Administration [J]. Political Science Quarterly, 1887,2(2):197-222.
[27] [美]吉瑞赛特.公共组织管理:理论和实践的演进[M].李丹,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2003.
[28] [德]韦伯.经济与社会(下)[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[29] Merton, R. Bureaucratic Structure and Personality [J]. Social Forces, 1940,18(4):560-568.
[30] [澳]休斯.公共管理导论[M].彭和平,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[31] [美]沃尔多.行政国家:美国公共行政的政治理论研究[M].颜昌武,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2017.
[32] [英]培根.新大西岛[M].何新,译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.
[33] 渠敬东,周飞舟,应星.从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):104-127.
[34] 颜昌武,杨华杰.以“迹”为“绩”:痕迹管理如何演变为痕迹主义[J].探索与争鸣,2019(11):111-121.
[35] 杜月.制图术:国家治理研究的一个新视角[J].社会学研究,2017(5):192-217.
[36] 王绍光. 新技术革命与国家理论[J]. 中央社会主义学院学报,2019(5):93-100.
[37] 涂子沛.大数据:正在到来的数据革命[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2012.
[38] 金燕.这是一场“用户端”改革[N].中国改革报,2019-01-16.
[1] CHEN Jing-ying, WANG guang-shuai, LIU Li-li, LIU Le-yuan. The Application of Human-computer Interaction Technology in the Education Intervention of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 111-119.
[2] HAN Zhi-ming, LEI Ye-fei. “Change” and “Constant” of Technology Governance——Take the Case of “palm cloud community” in Qixia, Nanjing as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 23-33.
[3] MA Liang. Civil Servants’ Information Technology Capacity and the Construction of Digital Government: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of Urban China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 34-44.
[4] YUAN Fang-cheng, LI Si-hang. The Risk of Technology Governance and Its Evolution Logic——Take Targeted Poverty Alleviation in Rural Areas as the Analysis Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 45-61.
[5] ZHANG Bing-xuan, REN Zhe. Rural Governance Driven by Digital Technology [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 62-72.
[6] WU Xiao-ling. Technology Empowerment and Bureaucratic Regulation: Political Logic in Technology Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 73-81.
[7] LIU Qiang. The Impact of Technology Innovation on Users’ Adoption Behaviors of New Media [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 170-178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LIU Qian. “Citizens” or “Populace”?——Modern Enlightenment of Classical View on Citizenship[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(5): 66 -72 .
[2] LIU Meng ying. Estonia Open Air Museum and the Vernacular Dwellings Protection Modes and Experience[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 88 -95 .
[3] XIE Long-hua. A Study on the Learning Quality of Migrant Workers’ Children     in Primary Schools[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 143 -148 .
[4] XU Le-le. Cultural Identity Crisis of Rural Juveniles and the Educational Strategy——From the Perspective of Cultural Anthropology[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 87 -93 .
[5] GUAN Ai-hua, WANG Sheng-zhen. Philosophical Reflection on the Correlation of Big Data in Ideological and Political Education——Based on the Causality of Thought and Behavior[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(1): 55 -60 .
[6] HAN Bowen. Demand Responsive Transit Scheduling Method Considering Real-time Demand[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 37(3): 9 -20 .
[7] LIU Jiming,TONG Bingli,LI Lixia,HE Xu,CHEN Jingzhong,HUANG Xiaolong. Responses of Male and Female Flower Differentiation of Jatropha curcas L. to 4 Exogenous Hormones[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 37(3): 148 -155 .
[8] XIA Qing-bo. The “Integrity” of Rawls’ Political Liberalism and Its Amendment: A Religious Criticism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(4): 49 -57 .
[9] YUAN Wei-yan. The Construction Effect of the New Land-sea Corridor in Western China:Connotation, Methods and Research Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 63 -73 .
[10] YU Xin-xin,ZHANG Yue,ZHENG Xue. The Influence and Mechanism of Optimism on College Students’ Health[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 83 -90 .