Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 59-69.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Causes and Countermeasures of the Heavy Burden of Primary-level Governments in the Perspective of the Relationship between Strip and Block

ZHOU Zhen-chao, HUANG Hong-kai   

  1. School of Politics and Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China
  • Received:2023-12-04 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-03-24

Abstract: The load operation has hampered the efficiency of primary-level governance. The burden comes not only from the heavy task itself, but also from the unbalanced relationship between the blocks. As a unique inter-governmental relationship model born in China’s political practice, the strip-block relationship has brought a certain negative externality while playing its unique political function, and has become one of the structural factors affecting the improvement of primary-level governance efficiency. In primary-level governance, some higher authorities transmit tasks and pressures through vertical contract awarding, assessment and supervision. In order to find a balance between accountability risk and promotion incentive, some officials have adopted a formalistic response, which at length results in mechanical policy executors and adds burden. To promote the burden reduction, we should start not only start from reducing unnecessary workload, but also from empowering and improving efficiency, i.e. we should give more governance resources and action space to primary-level governments by clarifying the responsibilities of departments, clarifying the relationship between powers and responsibilities, and improving the assessment mechanism.

Key words: primary-level governance, strip-block relationship, ease the burden on the primary-level governments , relationship between power and responsibility

CLC Number: 

  • D67
[1] 中共中央 国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[N].人民日报,2021-07-12(1).
[2] 颜昌武,杨郑媛.加压式减负:基层减负难的一个解释性框架[J].理论与改革,2022(1):76-86.
[3] 胡晓东.基层“减负”与治理:根源性因素探讨[J].治理研究,2022(2):32-43,124-125.
[4] 田先红.中国基层治理:体制与机制——条块关系的分析视角[J].公共管理与政策评论,2022(1):43-54.
[5] 吕德文.监督下乡与基层超负:基层治理合规化及其意外后果[J].公共管理与政策评论,2022(1):34-42.
[6] 吕健俊,陈柏峰.基层权责失衡的制度成因与组织调适[J].求实,2021(4):28-41,110.
[7] 刘滨,许玉镇.权责失衡与剩余权配置:基层减负进程中的“问责悖论”[J].求实,2021(3):19-35,109-110.
[8] 吴海红,吴安戚.基层减负背景下“责任甩锅”现象透视及其治理路径[J].治理研究,2020(5):50-56.
[9] 吴春来.条块关系与基层形式主义演化逻辑[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(2):129-140.
[10] 叶贵仁,陈燕玲.约束型自主:基层政府事权承接的逻辑[J].中国行政管理,2021(1):21-28.
[11] 任路.国家化、地方性与乡村治理结构内生性演化[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021(1):24-33.
[12] 周黎安.转型中的地方政府:官员激励与治理[M].上海:格致出版社,2017.
[13] 房宁.“顶格管理”是基层搞形式主义的根源[N].文摘报,2020-06-11(6).
[14] 欧阳静,王骏.形式主义地“讲政治”:基层策略主义的新表现[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(1):88-96.
[15] 吕芳.条块差异与公共服务政策的扩散[J].政治学研究,2021(5):77-88,157.
[16] 渠敬东,周飞舟,应星.从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):104-127,207.
[17] 田先红.“数字避责”:重大突发公共事件中基层官员避责行为研究——基于多案例的综合分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(1):74-87.
[18] 张翔.基层政策执行的“共识式变通”:一个组织学解释——基于市场监管系统上下级互动过程的观察[J].公共管理学报,2019(4):1-11,168.
[19] 赵树凯.乡镇治理与政府制度化[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018.
[20] 黄振华.县域、县城与乡村振兴[J].理论与改革,2022(4):156-165,168.
[21] 吕德文.基层中国:国家治理的基石[M].北京:东方出版社,2021.
[22] 杨华.县乡中国:县域治理现代化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2022.
[23] 叶俊东.直击痛点!大变局中的基层治理突围[M].北京:新华出版社,2019.
[24] 倪星,王锐.从邀功到避责:基层政府官员行为变化研究[J].政治学研究,2017(2):42-51,126.
[25] 郑杭生,黄家亮.当前我国社会管理和社区治理的新趋势[J].甘肃社会科学,2012(6):1-8.
[26] 黄建军.中国国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的制度逻辑[J].马克思主义研究,2020(8):43-51,155-156.
[27] 陈家建,张琼文,胡俞.项目制与政府间权责关系演变:机制及其影响[J].社会,2015(5):1-24.
[28] 王传利.基层工作效果如何科学衡量[J].人民论坛,2020(34):39-43.
[29] 张洋.年轻干部要提高解决实际问题能力 想干事能干事干成事[N].人民日报,2020-10-11(1).
[30] 苏曦凌,胡峥艳.政府与社会组织的协同进化[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2021.
[1] WU Xiao-lin, LI Yi. Spatial Cohesion: The Formation Mechanism of Primary-level Governance Community in the Transformation of Urban Living Space [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(4): 28-39.
[2] WANG Dian-li, SUN Yan. Off-domain Mobility and Emotional Symbiosis: How It Is Possible to Build a Community of Primary-level Social Governance in Urban-rural Integration —An Analysis Based on the Mutually Shaped Relations between Space and Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(3): 11-22.
[3] RONG Zhi, WU Lei, LI Jie. Digital Transformation of Primary-level Governance Driven by Public Value:Observation Based on the Operation of “Two Networks” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 49-62.
[4] ZHANG Hui-ping, YE Qing-lin. Data Authorization and Business Collaboration: A Breakthrough in the Dilemma of Community-level Governance Empowered by Department Data [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 63-73.
[5] WANG Gang, WU Xiang-nan. Organization Remolding by the Shift of Governance Focus: A Theoretical Summary of Governance Innovation in Urban Primary-level ——A Case Study of the Reform of “Whistle-blowing in Streets and Townships, Reporting of Departments, Joint Responsibility of Leaders” in Chengyang District of Q City [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 54-67.
[6] XU Yong, REN Lu. Construction of Field Politics Guided by Field Experiment ——Review and Reflection on Four Political Experiments Conducted by Central China Normal University [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 143-152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .
[5] LI Jian. Badiou’s Study on the Way of Human Existence —— from the Perspective of Radical Political Philosophy[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 37 -41 .
[6] LIU Jun-jie, BAI Xue-bing. The Study on the Integration of the "Four Modernizations" and Spatiotemporal Pattern in the Pearl River-the Xijiang River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 42 -50 .
[7] WU Da-shun. Cao Cao’s Imitation of Yue Fu and the Birth of Vigorous Style of Jian An[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 77 -83 .
[8] BAO Da-wei. Three Philosophical Dimensions of a Theory of Crisis:Historical Materialism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 23 -28 .
[9] LI Xiao-le. The Historical Logic of the Evolution of the State Governance Model in New China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 43 -48 .
[10] LI Kun-feng. Inner Motivation, Strengthening through Practice and Promoting Faith ——On the Three Mechanisms of College Students’ Political Identification[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 56 -60 .