Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 13-27.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.02.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Whole-Process People’s Democracy: A Good Democracy in Line with China’s National Conditions and Reality

ZHANG Jun   

  1. 1. University of Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100732;
    2. Institute of Political Science, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100732, China
  • Received:2023-02-16 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-05-25

Abstract: The whole-process people’s democracy is a major achievement made by China in re-examining democracy in the changing world and a general summary of socialist democratic political construction in the new era. The whole-process people’s democracy not only bears the value of socialist democracy, but also has completed the sublimation of people’s democracy in the new era. It presents the new meaning of socialist democratic politics with Chinese characteristics, and has realized the sublimation and transcendence of the achievements of human democratic development. Its internal logic is self-consistent, and there is an interlocking logical chain from the task background, the leader, to the subject power, the inner spirit and then to the operational orientation. It is a model of democracy with significant advantages, which can avoid excessive tension between the state and society, and capricious veto between power institutions. On this account, it has ensured the efficient operation of democratic politics, helped maintain the necessary voice and substantive influence of the people in public decision-making and governance, and met the people’s expectations for substantive democracy with high quality.

Key words: whole-process people’s democracy, people’s democracy, China’s model of democracy, substantive democracy

CLC Number:  D621
[1] Biden J R. Why America must lead again: rescuing U.S. foreign policy after trump[J]. Foreign Affairs, 2020, 22(2): 64-76.
[2] 肖立辉.全过程人民民主的理论逻辑与体系框架[J]. 人民论坛,2022(1):57-62.
[3] [美]乔万尼·萨托利.民主新论[M].冯克利,阎克文,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
[4] [美]罗伯特·A. 达尔.民主及其批评者[M].曹海军,佟德志,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.
[5] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[6] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[7] 列宁.国家与革命[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[8] 习近平.在中央人大工作会议上的讲话[J]. 求是,2022(5):4-13.
[9] 魏宪朝.论毛泽东新民主主义社会充分发展观的嬗变[J]. 毛泽东思想研究,1999(6):3-5.
[10] 刘建平.苏联、斯大林与中国共产党的人民民主专政理论及其体制的建立[J]. 中共党史研究,1997(6):64-71.
[11] 江泽民.江泽民文选(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[12] 张君.全过程人民民主:新时代人民民主的新形态[J]. 政治学研究,2021(4):11-17.
[13] 列宁.列宁全集(第28卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1990.
[14] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[15] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[16] 周少来,张君.现代化进程中的民主发展——中国特色社会主义民主政治发展40年[J]. 政治学研究,2018(6):78-87.
[17] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[18] 王绍光.人民至上:“人民”“为人民”“人民共和国”[J]. 中央社会主义学院学报,2021(2):50-60.
[19] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2017.
[20] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[21] [古希腊]亚里士多德.政治学[M].颜一,秦典华,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[22] [美]约瑟夫·熊彼特.资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].吴良健,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[23] 王绍光.代表型民主与代议型民主[J]. 开放时代,2014(2):152-174.
[24] [加]C. B. 麦克弗森.自由民主的生平与时代[M].闫飞飞,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2018.
[25] [美]达尔.多元主义民主的困境:自治与控制[M].周军华,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.
[26] [法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神(上册)[M].张雁深,译.北京:商务印书馆,1961.
[27] [美]曼瑟·奥尔森.国家的兴衰——经济增长、滞胀和社会僵化[M].李增刚,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2018.
[28] Tsebelis G. Veto players: how political institutions work[M]. Princeton University Press, 2002.
[29] 包心鉴.论全过程人民民主的内在逻辑和时代价值[J]. 当代世界与社会主义,2022(2):4-12.
[30] [法]卢梭. 社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[31] [美]罗伯特·A. 达尔,[美]布鲁斯·斯泰恩布里克纳. 现代政治分析(第六版)[M].吴勇,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[32] [法]米歇尔·克罗齐,[美]塞缪尔·P. 亨廷顿,[日]绵贯让治.民主的危机[M].北京:求实出版社,1989.
[33] 徐行,王娜娜.社会治理共同体视域下社区协商治理的梗阻与突破路径[J].北京:行政学院学报,2021(2):20-28.
[34] 人民日报评论部.建设法治中国,良法善治护航美好生活[N].人民日报,2022-09-13(5).
[35] Fukuyama F. Why is democracy performing so poorly?[J]. Journal of Democracy, 2015, 26(1):11-20.
[36] [英]托马斯·霍布斯. 利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼,译.北京:商务印书馆,1985.
[37] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[38] 邓小平.邓小平文选(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
[39] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政[M].北京:外文出版社,2014.
[40] Cunningham E, Saich T, Turiel J. Understanding CCP resilience: surveying Chinese public opinion through time[R]. Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center, July, 2020.
[41] 2022 Edelman Trust Barometer[R/OL].https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer.
[42] [美]卡尔·科恩.论民主[M].聂崇信,朱秀贤,译.北京:商务印书馆,1988.
[43] 中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会文件汇编[G].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[1] MA De-yong, HUANG Min-xuan. The Political Cognitive Basis of the Modernization of National Governance—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Netizens and College Students [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 21-36.
[2] ZHUO Yue, LUO Min. How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(6): 10-20.
[3] ZENG Nan. System Recognition: Foundation Building of Political Identification System [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 63-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .