广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 91-98.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.04.015

• 心理学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德判断研究的历史、现状与展望

李宏翰, 温舒雯   

  1. 广西师范大学教育学部,广西桂林541004
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-15 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-14
  • 作者简介:李宏翰(1970-),男,河南叶县人,广西师范大学教授,心理学博士,研究方向:道德判断、留守儿童。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目:“道德判断的中介变量研究”(31460254)

Moral Judgment: History, Present and Future

LI Hong-han, WEN Shu-wen   

  1. Faculty of Education,Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2017-02-15 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2018-07-14

PDF (PC)

662

摘要： 道德判断是心理学研究重点关注和广泛考察的主题,人们在日常生活中时常面临道德问题的评价和决策。与哲学和伦理学对于道德的思辨不同,心理学研究更关注道德判断的心理机制。20世纪中叶以来,道德判断研究的方法不断创新,为相关理论提供了许多实证支持。道德判断的主要理论有认知发展理论、启发式模型、社会直觉模型、双加工模型等。当代道德判断研究具有跨学科、多视角的特点,以认知神经科学为基础的多项研究表明道德判断受情境、情绪等多种因素的影响。未来的研究应当更注重视野的整合,注意提高实验的外部效度,注重中介效应的分析。

关键词: 道德判断, 道德决策, 认知发展理论, 启发式模型, 社会直觉模型, 双加工模型

Abstract: Moral judgment has been a very important topic since centuries ago. People often encounter issues about moral judgment and ethical decision making in daily life. Classical philosophers were concerned about the ethical meaning of morality and psychologists mainly focus on the mental mechanism of moral judgment. In recent decades, new methods of studies have emerged constantly, providing empirical evidence for psychological theories. Main theoretical models of moral psychology include cognitive development model, heuristics model, social intuitionist model and dual-process model. Contemporary studies with multiple points of view possess interdisciplinary characteristics. Experiments based on cognitive neuroscience highlight the role of influence factors ranging from specific situations to various emotions in moral judgment. We should pay more attention to the integration of psychological studies in the future. Moreover, mediator effect should be taken into account.

Key words: moral judgment, ethics decision, moral dilemma, heuristics model, social intuitionist model, dual-process model

中图分类号: 

  • B82-054
[1] 康德.康德谈人性与道德[M].石磊,译.天津:天津社会科学院出版社,2014.
[2] 休谟.人性论[M].关文运,译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[3] Greene J D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment[J]. Science, 2001, 293(5537): 2105-2108.
[4] Greene J D, Nystrom L E, Engell A D, et al. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment[J]. Neuron, 2004, 44(2): 389-400.
[5] Greene J D, Morelli S A, Lowenberg K, et al. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment[J]. Cognition, 2008, 107(3): 1144-1154.
[6] Paxton J M, Ungar L, Greene J D. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment[J]. Cognitive Science, 2012, 36(1): 163-177.
[7] Paxton J M, Bruni T, Greene J D. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to Kahane et al. (2012) [J]. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014, 9(9): 1368-1371.
[8] Amit E, Greene J D. You See, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment[J]. Psychological Science, 2012, 23(8): 861-868.
[9] 皮亚杰. 发生认识论原理[M]. 王宪钿,译. 北京:商务印书馆, 1997.
[10] Rest J, Turiel E, Kohlberg L. Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgments made by others[J]. Journal of Personality, 1969, 37(2): 225-252.
[11] Tapp J L, Kohlberg L. Developing senses of law and legal justice[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1971, 27(2): 65-91.
[12] 喻丰, 彭凯平, 韩婷婷, 等. 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712.
[13] Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment[J]. Psychological review, 2001, 108(4): 814-834.
[14] Paxton J M, Greene J D. Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations[J]. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2010, 2(3): 511-527.
[15] Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements[J]. Nature, 2007, 446(7138): 908-911.
[16] Mendez M F, Anderson E, Shapira J S. An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia[J]. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Official Journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2005, 18(4): 193-197.
[17] Schubert T W. Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 89(1): 1-21.
[18] Wiech K, Kahane G, Shackel N, et al. Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment[J]. Cognition, 2013, 126(3): 364-372.
[19] Frank M G, Gilovich T. The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1988, 54(1): 74-85.
[20] Goodhew S C, Mcgaw B, Kidd E. Why is the sunny side always up? Explaining the spatial mapping of concepts by language use[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2014, 21(5): 1287-1293.
[21] Hill P L, Lapsley D K. The ups and downs of the moral personality: Why it’s not so black and white[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009(43): 520-523.
[22] Williams L E, Bargh J A. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5901): 606-607.
[23] Williams L E, Bargh J A. Keeping one’s distance: the influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation[J]. Psychological science, 2008, 19(3): 302-308.
[24] Zhong C B, Leonardelli G J. Cold and lonely: does social exclusion literally feel cold?[J]. Psychological Science, 2008, 19(9): 838-842.
[25] Dong P, Huang X I, Zhong C. Ray of Hope: Hopelessness Increases Preferences for Brighter Lighting[J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2015, 6(1): 84-91.
[26] Meier B P, & Robinson M D. Why the sunny side is up[J]. Psychological Science, 2004, 15(4):243-247.
[27] Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore G L, et al. Disgust as embodied moral judgment[J]. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2008, 34(8): 1096-1109.
[28] 彭凯平, 喻丰. 道德的心理物理学:现象、机制与意义[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(12): 28-45.
[29] Johnson W, Krueger R F. How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, 90(4): 680-691.
[30] Pitesa M, Thau S. A lack of material resources causes harsher moral judgments[J]. Psychological Science, 2014, 25(3): 702-710.
[31] 李亚凝. 以Netlogo社会模拟实验为基础对道德缺失的法律解决方案[J]. 厦门大学法律评论, 2013(2): 261-288.
[32] 彭凯平, 喻丰, 柏阳. 实验伦理学:研究、贡献与挑战[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(6):15-25.
[33] 李宏翰, 许闯. 道德隐喻:道德研究的隐喻视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012(5):111-117.
[34] Zhong C B, Strejcek B, Sivanathan N. A clean self can render harsh moral judgment[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010, 46(5): 859-862.
[35] Eskine K J, & Kacinik N A, & Prinz J J. A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgments [J]. Psychological Science, 2011(22):295-299.
[36] 任俊, 高肖肖. 道德情绪:道德行为的中介调节[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011 (8): 1224-1232.
[37] Zhong C, Liljenquist K. Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5792): 1451-1452.
[38] Caruso E M, Gino F. Blind ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior[J]. Cognition, 2011, 118(2): 280-285.
[39] Crisp R J, & Turner R N. Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact[J]. American Psychologist, 2009, 64, 231-240.
[40] 莫丹. 危机与不安唤醒道德: 避害需要是道德判断的核心中介变量[D]. 桂林:广西师范大学教育学部, 2013.
[41] Young L, Saxe R. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains[J]. Cognition, 2011, 120(2): 202-214.
[42] Piazza J, Landy J F, Goodwin G P. Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing[J]. Cognition, 2014, 131(1): 108-124.
[43] Brambilla M, Sacchi S, Rusconi P, et al. You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 51(1): 149-166.
[44] Van d B K. On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85(3): 482-498.
[45] Welsh B P, & Farrington D C. Effects of improved street lighting on crime[J]. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13.
[46] Zhong C B, Bohns V K, Gino F. Good lamps are the best police: darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 21(3): 311-314.
[47] 李顺雨. 道德/不道德行为回忆对明度知觉的影响及其心理机制[D]. 桂林:广西师范大学教育学部, 2014.
[48] 张侃, 张厚粲, 林崇德, 朱滢, 杨玉芳, 韩布新,等. 2020年中国心理学发展研究[C]. 北京:中国科学和技术发展研究暨科学家讨论会组委会, 2004.
[49] 彭运石, 林崇德, 车文博. 西方心理学的方法论危机及其超越[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006(2): 49-58.
[50] Zhong C B, Liljenquist K. Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing[J]. Science, 2006, 313: 1451-1452.
[51] Rozin P, Lowery L, Ebert R. Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1994, 66(5): 870-881.
[52] Moll J, De O R, Moll F T, et al. The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study[J]. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Official Journal of the Society for Behavioral & Cognitive Neurology, 2005, 18(1): 68-78.
[53] 阎书昌. 身体洁净与道德[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(8): 1242-1248.
[54] 方杰,张敏强,邱皓政. 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量:回顾与展望[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012(1): 105-111.
[55] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,Marsh H W. 结构方程模型中调节效应的标准化估计[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(6): 729-736.
[56] 温忠麟,叶宝娟. 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补?[J]. 心理学报, 2014(5): 714-726.
[1] 孙配贞, 贾茹, 林泉. 社会转型期初中生孝道观念特点研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(4): 101-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] magtech. 测试发布文章[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] magtech. 测试最新录用[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 0, (): 1 .
[3] 陈延斌, 王伟. 传统家礼文献整理、研究的学术史梳理与评析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] 李冰, 陈姝瑾. 《郑氏家仪》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] 朱莉涛. 《茗洲吴氏家典》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] 周良书, 郭文杰. 中共开展党内政治生活的历史与经验[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] 张乾元, 朱倩倩. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的核心要旨[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] 潘瑾菁. 习近平新时代网络意识形态工作思想研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] 瞿久淞, 靳书君. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义话语研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] 邓世平. 乡村振兴:习近平对毛泽东农村发展思想的继承与发展[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发