科学方法、文明探源与夏代信史之争

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.03.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 审视当下我国文明探源中的科学方法问题,讨论了本体论、认识论和方法论的要义。在强调了常用术语概念化的基础上,梳理了文明与早期国家探源中最流行的几个关键术语:考古学文化、族群和国家,认为这些概念之间没有逻辑的对应关系。因此,偏好二重证据法的夏代信史学者将二里头文化对应夏族和夏代的论断是不能令人信服的。面对当下学术全球化的趋势,我们应该学好当代社会科学方法,开阔文明探源的视野,让我国的文明探源成果能够跻身国际水平。

关键词: 文明探源, 科学方法, 术语概念化, 关键概念, 夏代之争, 学术全球化

Abstract: The paper reviews the issue of scientific approaches in the studies of China’s early civilization and discusses the big deal of ontology, epistemology and methodology. On the basis of the significance of conceptualization of common terminology, the paper sorts out a few key terms namely archaeological culture, ethnicity, and state employed in the research, and argues that among these concepts there lie no corresponding relationships. Thus, unconvincing is the conclusion that Erlitou Culture corresponds to the Xia ethnic group and the Xia Dynasty made by some scholars who prefer dual evidence law. Facing the trend of academic globalization, we have to widen our perspective and adopt modern sociological methods, thus ranking top internationally in our exploring early civilization.

Key words: origin of civilization, scientific approaches, conceptualization of terminology, key concepts, argument about the Xia Dynasty, academic globalization

中图分类号:

K061

陈淳. 科学方法、文明探源与夏代信史之争[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(3): 128-140.

CHEN Chun. Scientific Approaches, the Origin of Civilization and the Argument about the History of the Xia Dynasty[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 128-140.

参考文献

[1] [美]费侠莉.丁文江:科学与中国新文化[M].丁子霖,蒋毅坚,杨昭,译;杨照明,校. 北京:新星出版社,2006.
[2] Kenneth Hoover and Todd Donovan. The Elements of Social Scientific Thinking[M]. 10th edition, Boston, Wadsworth, 2004.
[3] [以]史蒂夫·韦纳.考古学、考古科技与整合的考古学[J].吴双,译;陈淳,校.南方文物,2015(3):213-215.
[4] [美]戈登·威利.戈登·威利自传[J].杨明强,译;靳桂云,陈淳,校.南方文物,2019(3):253.
[5] [美]加里·戈茨.概念界定:关于测量、个案和理论的讨论[M].尹继武,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014.
[6] [瑞士]让·皮亚杰.人文科学认识论[M].郑文彬,译. 北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
[7] Bruce G. Trigger. Archaeology and epistemology: dialoguing across the Darwinian chasm[C]// Artifacts & Ideas: Essays in Archaeology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2003.
[8] David H. Thomas, Archaeology[M]. Third edition, Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc., 1998.
[9] [英]柯林武德.柯林武德自传[M].陈静,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[10] [美]托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[11] [加]布鲁斯·特里格.考古学思想史(第二版中译本)[M].陈淳,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[12] [美]戈登·威利.聚落与历史重建:秘鲁维鲁河谷的史前聚落形态[M].谢银玲,曹小燕,黄家豪,李雅淳,译;陈淳,审校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2018.
[13] 裴安平.中国史前聚落群聚形态研究[M]. 北京:中华书局,2014.
[14] Kalervo Oberg. Types of social structure among the lowland tribes of south and central America[J]. American Anthropologist, 1955, 57(3):427-487.
[15] [美]埃尔曼·塞维斯.国家与文明的起源[M].龚辛,郭露莎,陈力子,译;陈淳,审校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2019.
[16] 谢维扬.中国早期国家[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1995.
[17] 苏秉琦.中国文明起源新探[M]. 北京:三联书店,1999.
[18] [美]路易斯·亨利·摩尔根.古代社会(上册)[M].杨东莼,马雍,马巨,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[19] V. Godon Childe. Urban revolution[J]. Town Planning Review, 1950, 21(1):3-17.
[20] 王巍.中华5000多年文明的考古实证[J].求是,2020(2):70-76.
[21] Bruce G. Trigger. Beyond History: The Method of Prehistory [M]. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
[22] David H. Thomas. Archaeology [M]. Third edition, Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc., 1998.
[23] 林定夷.科学逻辑与科学方法论[M]. 成都:电子科技大学出版社,2003.
[24] 徐旭生.1959年夏豫西调查“夏墟”的初步报告[J]. 考古,1959(11):593.
[25] 夏鼐. 谈谈探讨夏文化的几个问题[J]. 河南文博通讯,1978(1):32.
[26] 邹衡.夏商周考古学论文集(第二版)[M].北京:文物出版社,2001.
[27] [英] 希安·琼斯. 族属的考古[M].陈淳,沈辛成,译. 上海:上海古籍出版社,2017.
[28] Michael Moerman. Who are the Lue？[J]. American Anthropologist, 1965(67):1217-1221.
[29] Fredrik Barth. Pathan identity and its maintenance[C]// F. Barth. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Boston: Little Brown, 1969.
[30] Morton H. Fried. The Evolution of Political Society[M]. New York: Random House, 1967.
[31] Bruce G. Trigger. Shang political organization, a comparative approach[J]. Journal of East Asian Archaeology, 1999(1):43-52.
[32] 夏鼐.什么是考古学[J].考古,1984(10):932.
[33] 孙庆伟.鼏宅禹迹——夏代信史的考古学重建[M].北京:三联书店,2018.
[34] 刘周岩. 孙庆伟:“信”比“疑”更难[J]. 三联生活周刊,2018(23):56-59.
[35] 乔治忠. 王国维“二重证据法”蕴义与影响的再审视[J].南开学报,2010(4):134-140.
[36] David N. Keightley, Marks and labels: early writings in Neolithic and Shang China[C]// M.T. Stark. Archaeology of Asia. Malden, MA, Blackwell, 2006.
[37] 刘莉. 中国新石器时代:迈向早期国家之路[M].陈星灿,等译.北京:文物出版社,2007.
[38] [英]科林·伦福儒,保罗·巴恩. 考古学:理论、方法与实践(中文第一版)[M].中国社会科学院考古研究所,译.北京:文物出版社,2004.
[39] Stephen H. Savage. Some recent trend in the archaeology of prehistoric Egypt[J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 2001, 9(2):134.
[40] 陈淳. 从考古学理论方法谈古史重建[J].历史研究,2018(5):19-20.
[41] 林定夷. 科学研究方法概论[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,1986.
[42] 张光直. 序言[M]//布鲁斯·特里格.时间与传统. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[43] [捷克]贾洛斯拉夫·马里纳,泽德奈克·瓦希塞克. 考古学概念的考古 [J] .陈淳,译. 南方文物,2011(2):93-96.
[44] 张光直.考古人类学随笔[M]. 北京:三联书店,1999.
[45] 俞可平. 全球化与中国学术[N]. 文汇报,2008-07-06.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed