城市层级、融资能力与都市圈协同发展——基于空间政治经济学的视角

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.03.011

广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 119-130.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.03.011

城市层级、融资能力与都市圈协同发展——基于空间政治经济学的视角

刘红芹

华东理工大学公共政策系,上海 200237

收稿日期:2022-03-06 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-07-11
作者简介:刘红芹,女,湖北汉川人,华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院讲师,研究方向:公共财政、政府间关系。
基金资助:
上海市哲学社会科学规划青年项目“积极财政政策背景下的政府支出效率研究”(2018EGL020)

City Administrative Hierarchy, Financing Capacity and Coordinated Development of Metropolitan Area: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Spatial Political Economics

LIU Hong-qin

Department of Public Policy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2022-03-06 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-07-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 空间政治经济学聚焦讨论了与城市发展和平衡相关的议题,但少有研究聚焦城市层级对城市发展及空间失衡的影响。以城市基础设施建设为例,实证检验发现:中国城市在发展扩张过程中,融资能力呈现出鲜明的行政层级差异,且这种差异随着时间的推移而不断扩大,并展现出区域异质性。具体而言,城市因行政层级带来的融资优势,在东部最小,中西部次之,东北地区则最为显著,呈现出内陆地区省会城市一枝独秀的发展格局。与此同时,中央平衡发展政策减少了东西融资差距,弥补了部分落后城市的融资劣势;高行政层级城市的空间溢出效应也得到了经验支持;在长三角与珠三角的城市群一体化区域,城市因区域协同发展效应,更易具有融资优势。因此,为提升城市发展的空间效率和可持续性,应在既有的纵向支持体系下,通过设计顶层政策支撑,逐步建立以高行政层级为中心的城市间横向支持体系,最终实现都市圈的协同发展与共赢。

关键词: 城市行政层级, 融资能力, 空间政治经济学, 协同发展

Abstract: Space political economy has focused on discussing issues related to urban development and balance, but few studies have targeted to the impact of city administrative hierarchy on urban development and spatial imbalance. Taking urban infrastructure construction as an example, this empirical test finds that in China's urban expansion, the financing capabilities varies depending on the city's administrative hierarchy, and such discrepancy expands over time and exhibits regional heterogeneity. Specifically, the financing advantages brought by administrative hierarchy weigh lest in China's eastern region, followed by the central and western regions, and weighs most in the northeast, presenting a unique pattern of inland provincial capital cities standing out. At the same time, the central balanced development policy has reduced the financing gap between China's east and west, making up for the financing disadvantages of some backward cities; the spatial spillover effect of high administrative level cities has also received empirical support; in the integrated urban agglomeration region of the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta, cities are more likely to bear financing advantages due to the regional coordinated development. Therefore, in order to improve the spatial efficiency and sustainability of urban development, we should gradually establish a horizontal inter-city support system centered on high administrative hierarchy under the existing vertical support system and through the design of top-level policy support, so as to finally realize the coordinated development and win-win situation of metropolitan area.

Key words: city administrative hierarchy, financing capacity, spatial political economy, coordinated development

中图分类号: F290

刘红芹. 城市层级、融资能力与都市圈协同发展——基于空间政治经济学的视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2023, 59(3): 119-130.

LIU Hong-qin. City Administrative Hierarchy, Financing Capacity and Coordinated Development of Metropolitan Area: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Spatial Political Economics[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(3): 119-130.

参考文献

[1] 唐为.中国城市规模分布体系过于扁平化吗？[J].世界经济文汇,2016(1):36-51.
[2] 陆铭.城市、区域和国家发展——空间政治经济学的现在与未来[J].经济学(季刊),2017(4):1499-1532.
[3] 蔡华玲.长三角都市圈协同发展的空间困境与治理进路[J].江淮论坛,2022(1):80-85.
[4] 方创琳.新发展格局下的中国城市群与都市圈建设[J].经济地理,2021(4):1-7.
[5] 魏守华,杨阳,陈珑隆.城市等级、人口增长差异与城镇体系演变[J].中国工业经济,2020(7):5-23.
[6] 武剑,林金忠.马克思主义空间政治经济学:研究进展及中国启示[J].江苏社会科学,2013(4):76-83.
[7] 刘能.重返空间社会学:继承费孝通先生的学术遗产[J].学海,2014(4):16-23.
[8] 金煜,陈钊,陆铭.中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政策[J],经济研究,2006(4):79-89.
[9] Lefebvre H. Space: social product and use value[M].New York: Irvington,1986.
[10] Lefebvre H. The production of space[M]. Donald Nicholson-Smith,Blackwell Ltd,1993:30-31.
[11] Castells M. The city and the grassroots: a cross cultural theory of urban social movements[M]. London: Edward Arnold,1983:71-99.
[12] Castells M. Collective consumption and urban contradictions in advanced capitalism[C]//Susser I(Eds). The castells reader on cities and social theory.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,1995:39-47.
[13] Harvey D. The limits to capital[M].London: Verso,2006:140-143.
[14] 陆铭,刘雅丽.区域平衡发展:中国道路的“空间政治经济学”思考[J].广西财经学院学报,2019(4):1-10.
[15] 陆铭,李鹏飞,钟辉勇.发展与平衡的新时代——新中国70年的空间政治经济学[J].管理世界,2019(10):11-23.
[16] 周立.空间政治经济学研究进展评介[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2021(3):113-125.
[17] 何艳玲,赵俊源.差序空间:政府塑造的中国城市空间及其属性[J].学海,2019(5):39-48.
[18] Davis J C.Henderson J V. Evidence on the political economy of the urbanization process[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2003,53:98-125.
[19] 王垚,年猛.政府“偏爱”与城市发展:文献综述及其引申[J].改革,2014(8):141-147.
[20] 邓伟.国有经济、行政级别与中国城市的收入差距[J].经济科学,2011(2):19-30.
[21] Black D,Henderson V. Urban evolution in the USA[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2003,3:343-372.
[22] 吴传清,孟晓倩.虹吸还是溢出?——“强省会”战略的经济增长极效应分析[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(1):124-136.
[23] 王垚,王春华,洪俊杰,等.自然条件、行政等级与中国城市发展[J].管理世界,2015(1):41-50.
[24] 胡雯,张锦华.城市的力量:农民工层级迁移与工资溢价[J].财经研究,2021(2):4-18.
[25] 年猛,王垚.行政等级与大城市拥挤之困——冲破户籍限制的城市人口增长[J].财贸经济,2016(11):126-145.
[26] 王振坡,游斌,王丽艳.论新型城镇化进程中的金融支持与创新[J].中央财经大学学报,2014(12):46-53.
[27] 毛文峰.蔓延的城市发展模式与地方公共财政负担[J].财政研究,2019(11):64-76.
[28] 何杨,王蔚.土地财政、官员特征与地方债务膨胀——来自中国省级市政投资的经验证据[J].中央财经大学学报,2015(6):10-19.
[29] 陆铭,陈钊.论中国区域经济发展的两大因素和两种力量[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2005(4):27-38.
[30] 蔡昉,都阳.转型中的中国城市发展——城市级层结构、融资能力与迁移政策[J].经济研究,2003(6):64-71.
[31] 周黎安.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作——兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究,2004(6):33-40.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

城市层级、融资能力与都市圈协同发展——基于空间政治经济学的视角

City Administrative Hierarchy, Financing Capacity and Coordinated Development of Metropolitan Area: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Spatial Political Economics

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0