广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 166-178.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.03.017

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    

“仪式”与“音乐”视域下《诗经》的“口头性”及其消歇

李辉   

  1. 首都师范大学中国诗歌研究中心,北京 100089
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-21 出版日期:2026-05-05 发布日期:2026-04-27
  • 作者简介:李辉,首都师范大学中国诗歌研究中心教授,研究方向:先秦两汉文学。
  • 基金资助:
    2023年国家社科基金一般项目“《诗经》的早期经典化研究”(23BZW036)

The "Orality" of The Book of Songs and Its Decline from the Perspectives of "Rituals" and "Music"

LI Hui   

  1. The Research Center for Chinese Poetry, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China
  • Received:2025-11-21 Online:2026-05-05 Published:2026-04-27

摘要: 《诗》的“口头性”在创作、传播、流传阶段有不同程度的体现。歌诗中含有口语元素、口语活动的描述、套语现象,不代表诗出自口头创作。燕饮诗中比兴与重章相配而用,便于诗人或歌者根据现场情境即兴作诗,最能体现创作的“口头性”。《诗》在“无算乐”中歌唱无一定之数,歌者可以根据仪式规格、歌唱时长、主宾兴致临场发挥,断章而歌。赋诗断章取义,渊源于此。二者都体现了《诗》传播的“口头性”,《诗》文本相对开放、流动,歌赋者具有高度的自主性、机动性。引《诗》脱离仪式、音乐成为纯粹的话语活动,引者借重《诗》的经典属性,并有意阐释、塑造《诗》文本与意义的稳定、权威,已较少体现“口头性”。《诗》在不同时空、载体、人群间传递、传授、转录、传抄时,已接近封闭完成,虽有口头形式的参与,也有不少谐音异文,但具有情境性、衍生功能的“口头性”在《诗》流传阶段已逐渐消歇。《诗》的“口头性”,根本上是行为主体与《诗》文本何者更具主体性的问题。《诗》“口头性”的消歇,是去乐化、去情境化的过程,也是文本与意义趋于稳定、权威的过程,是《诗》早期经典化的重要一环。

关键词: 《诗经》, 口头性, 仪式, 歌唱, 经典化

Abstract: The "orality" of The Book of Songs is manifested to varying degrees in the stages of composition, communication and dissemination. The fact that poems contain colloquial elements, descriptions of spoken activities, and formulaic expressions does not mean that the poems originated from oral composition. In the Banquet Poems, the combined use of "analogy and evocative image" (比兴) with "stanzaic repetition" (重章) allowed poets or singers to compose impromptu poems based on the on-site situation, which best reflects the "orality" in the composition stage. During the "wu suan yue"(无算乐)in ancient rituals, there was no fixed form for singing. Singers could improvise and select verses to sing according to the ritual specifications, the duration of the performance, and the mood of the hosts and guests. The practice of "quoting poems out of context for specific purposes"(赋诗断章取义)originated from this custom. Both phenomena embody the "orality" of The Book of Songs in its communication stage: the text was relatively open and fluid, and those who sang or quoted the poems enjoyed a high degree of autonomy and flexibility. As the practice of quoting from The Book of Songs-originally embedded in ritual and musical performance-evolved into a purely discursive activity, quoters invariably invoked the text′s canonical nature for authority. They intentionally interpreted and shaped the stability and authority of the text and its meanings, resulting in a significant reduction in the manifestation of "orality". When The Book of Songs was transmitted, taught, transcribed, and copied across different times, spaces, mediums, and groups, it gradually became a relatively closed and finalized work. Although oral forms were still involved and there were many variant characters caused by homophones, the "orality"-with its situational dependence and derivative functions-gradually faded away. Fundamentally, the "orality" of The Book of Songs is a question of whether the acting agent or the text itself possesses greater agency. Its decline was a process of detachment from music and contextualization, as well as a process in which the text and its meaning became increasingly stabilized and authoritative. This marked a crucial step in the early canonization of The Book of Songs.

Key words: The Book of Songs, orality, ritual, performance, canonization

中图分类号:  I206.2

[1] 林训涛. 《诗经》“风”义原始与《风》诗文体[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 61(1): 137-146.
[2] 赵巧艳. 侗族传统民居上梁仪式的田野民族志[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(2): 101-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发