广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 98-105.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.06.009

• 教育科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

评估何以促进深度学习

曾文婕   

  1. 华南师范大学 教育科学学院,广东 广州 510631
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-11-14
  • 作者简介:曾文婕,华南师范大学教育科学学院副院长、教授、博士生导师,研究方向:课程与教学基本理论。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“推动中小学育人方式改革的学习为本评估策略研究”(GD23XJY53)

How Can Assessment Promote Deep Learning?

ZENG Wen-jie   

  1. School of Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-14

摘要: 学校教育领域已经发展出“走出浅层学习的深度学习”“涵盖多种维度的深度学习”“提升核心素养的深度学习”和“指向知识创造的深度学习”四种类型的深度学习。我国常见的评估方式在促进深度学习方面存在许多“难为”之处,主要表现为深度学习所强调的隐性指标难以评估及以评促学难以达成。改进评估促进学生的深度学习,需要反思测试主义以凸显日常评估,反思“独白式评估”以加强“对话式评估”。我国在一定程度上仍然存在“应试文化”,为了使改进评估以促进深度学习得以可能,尤其需要突出深度学习所强调的隐性指标与显性指标的关联。同时,学校需要提高教师改进评估以促进深度学习的素养,帮助教师丰富评估知识,不断优化所持有的评估观,从而实现自己作为深度学习评估者的身份认同和重构。

关键词: 深度学习, 以评促学, 评估素养, 评估改革, 应试文化

Abstract: Four types of deep learning have been developed in school education, namely “deep learning that goes beyond surface learning”, “deep learning that covers multiple dimensions”, “deep learning that cultivates core competencies”, and “deep learning that targets to knowledge-creation”. The common assessment approaches available in China suffer from headaches in promoting deep learning, mainly told by the troubles in assessing implicit indicators and promoting learning through assessment. To improve assessment for promoting students’ deep learning, it is needed to reflect the examination doctrine to emphasize daily assessment and reflect “monologue-type assessment” to reinforce “dialogue-type assessment”. As the “test-oriented culture” is still available in China to some extent, the correlation between implicit and explicit indicators emphasized by deep learning should be particularly highlighted. At the same time, it is necessary to enhance teachers’ assessment literacy for deep learning, enrich their knowledge about assessment, continuously optimize their conceptions of assessment, so as to realize and reconstruct the identity of teachers as assessors for deep learning.

Key words: deep learning, promoting learning through assessment, assessment literacy, assessment reform, test-oriented culture

中图分类号:  G40-058.1

[1] Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976(1): 4-11.
[2] Entwistle N J, Ramsden P. Understanding student learning[M]. London & Canberra: Croom Helm, 1983.
[3] 吴永军.关于深度学习的再认识[J].课程·教材·教法,2019(2):51-58,36.
[4] American Institutes for Research. Evidence of deeper learning outcomes[R]. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, 2014.
[5] 陈静静.学习共同体:走向深度学习[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2020.
[6] 刘月霞,郭华.深度学习:走向核心素养[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2018.
[7] [加]迈克尔·富兰,[美]玛丽亚·兰沃希.极富空间:新教育学如何实现深度学习[M].于佳琪,黄雪锋,译.重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2016.
[8] Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning-II outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task[J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976(2):115-127.
[9] Boud D, Falchikov N. Rethinking assessment in higher education[M]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
[10] 李本友,李红恩,余宏亮.学生学习方式转变的影响因素、途径与发展趋势[J].教育研究,2012(2):122-128.
[11] 戴歆紫,王祖浩.国外深度学习的分析视角及评价方法[J].外国教育研究,2017(10):45-58.
[12] Gravett S, Petersen N. Structuring dialogue with students via learning tasks[J]. Innovative Higher Education, 2002(4):281-291.
[13] [美]莫妮卡·R.马丁内斯,[美]丹尼斯·麦格拉思.深度学习:批判性思维与自主性探究式学习[M].唐奇,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019.
[14] 岳欣云,董宏建.论小学生数学隐性学力的提升[J].课程·教材·教法,2016(10):63-68.
[15] Xu Y, Brown G T L. Teacher assessment literacy in practice: a reconceptualization[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016(1):149-162.
[1] 王梦珂, 王卓, 陈增照. 深度学习评价:理论模型、相关技术与实践案例[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 59(6): 66-75.
[2] 许锋华, 余乐. 深度学习的教育学研究:缘起、内涵与展望[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 147-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发