广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 118-129.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.03.010

• 教育科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术伦理视域下美国教育人工智能伦理问题审视:现实表征与规避策略

唐晓玲, 郑楚月   

  1. 四川外国语大学 国际教育学院,重庆 400031
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-10 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-05-17
  • 作者简介:唐晓玲,四川外国语大学国际教育学院教授,教育学博士,硕士研究生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金教育学项目“大数据背景下高等教育监测评估的社会风险与治理策略研究”(BIA220083)

An Examination of the Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in American Education from the Perspective of Technical Ethics: Realistic Representation and Avoidance Strategies

TANG Xiao-ling, ZHENG Chu-yue   

  1. School of International Education, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing 40003, China
  • Received:2023-12-10 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-17

PDF (PC)

91

摘要： 教育人工智能是一种新兴技术,在凸显其优越性的同时逐渐显现出诸多技术伦理问题。美国作为教育人工智能技术的先驱国家,其教育人工智能技术伦理问题表征和规避策略更具典型性。美国教育人工智能在使用过程中出现各种偏见、歧视:智能系统出现错误和技术漏洞时追责困难;海量数据搜集会侵犯学生多种权利;学生长时间使用智能系统可能面临发展障碍,出现“成事”与“成人”的价值冲突。为规避教育人工智能伦理风险,美国制定了教育人工智能相关标准,加强教育人工智能算法监管,出台数据保护指南和法案,并规范智能技术在教育中的应用。我国应借鉴美国教育人工智能伦理问题的治理策略,制定和完善教育人工智能相应政策,建立贯穿全生命周期的全员联动监管机制,研制教育人工智能伦理框架,培养和提升师生的人工智能素养。

关键词: 美国, 教育人工智能, 伦理问题, 技术伦理

Abstract: As an emerging technology, artificial intelligence in education (AIED), though with its advantages, gradually reveals many ethical issues. The ethical issues and avoidance strategies of AIED technology in the United States, a pioneer country in AIED technology, are more typical. Various biases and discrimination have emerged: it is difficult to hold accountable for errors and technical vulnerabilities in intelligent systems; massive data collection may infringe on students' various rights; students' long-term use of intelligent systems may face obstacles to development, thus a value conflict between “gaining success” and “being human”. To avoid such ethical risks, the United States has formulated relevant standards, strengthened the algorithms supervision, introduced data protection guidelines and bills, and standardized the application of intelligent technology in education. China should learn from the governance strategies adopted by the United States, formulate and improve the corresponding policies, establish a full-staff collaborative supervision mechanism throughout the whole life cycle, develop an ethical framework of educational artificial intelligence, and cultivate and improve the artificial intelligence literacy of teachers and students.

Key words: America, artificial intelligence in education, ethical issues, technical ethics

中图分类号:  G43

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.创新技术服务教学进步,人工智能助力未来教育——2021国际人工智能与教育会议举行[EB/OL].(2021-12-08)[2023-04-28].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/moe_1485/202112/t20211208_585822.html.
[2] Campolo A , Sanfilippo M R , Whittaker M , et al. AI now 2017 report[C]// AI now 2017 symposium and workshop. AI Now Institute at New York University, 2017.
[3] Lynne E P. Creation of the national artificial intelligence research and development strategic plan[J]. AI Magazine,2018(2):25.
[4] David L. Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety:a guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector[J/OL].[2023-06-22].https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3240529.
[5] UNESCO. Final report on the draft text of the recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence[EB/OL]. (2021-03-31)[2023-11-08].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376712.locale=zh.
[6] European Commission. Ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence[EB/OL].(2019-04-08)[2023-06-12].https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
[7] 刘三女牙,刘盛英杰.智能教育发展中的若干关键问题[J].中国远程教育,2021(4):1-7,76.
[8] The Institute for Ethical AI in Education. The ethical framework for AI in education[EB/OL].(2021-03-25)[2023-10-20].https://www.buckingham.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Institute-for-Ethical-AI-in-Education-The-Ethical-Framework-for-AI-in-Education.pdf.
[9] Southgate E, Blackmore K. Artificial intelligence and emerging technologies (virtual, augmented and mixed reality) in schools: a research report[R/OL]. (2018-01-03)[2023-11-11].https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2019-08/apo-nid254301.pdf.
[10] UNESCO.北京共识——人工智能与教育[EB/OL]. [2023-11-12].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303.
[11] Kate Crawford. Artificial intelligence's white guy problem[EB/OL].(2016-06-25)[2023-12-01].http://www.thelowdownblog.com/2016/06/artificial-intelligences-white-guy.html.
[12] Eicher B , Polepeddi L , Goel A. Jill watson doesn't care if you're pregnant: grounding AI ethics in empirical studies[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, 2018.
[13] Finkelstein S , Yarzebinski E , Vaughn C , et al. The effects of culturally congruent educational technologies on student achievement[C]//International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013: 493-502.
[14] Feathers T. Flawed algorithms are grading millions of students' essays[EB/OL].(2019-08-20)[2023-12-01]. https://www.vice.com/en/article/pa7dj9/flawed-algorithms-are-grading-millions-of-students-essays.
[15] Hu Q, Rangwala H. Towards fair educational data mining: a case study on detecting at-risk students[J]. International Educational Data Mining Society, 2020:431-437.
[16] District of Columbia Public Schools. Impact review findings to date[EB/OL].(2021-08])[2023-08-28].https://dcps.dc.gov/page/impact-review-findings-date-august-2021.
[17] UNESCO. I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education[EB/OL].(2019-03-05)[2023-07-25]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367416.page=1.
[18] Emily Tate. Students take summit learning protests directly to facebook chief[EB/OL].(2018-12-25)[2023-09-10]. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-11-15-dear-mr-zuckerberg-students-take-summit-learning-protests-directly-to-facebook-chief.
[19] Teninbaum G H. Report on exam soft's exam ID Feature (and a method to bypass It)[J].Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Law,2021,4(4):293-300.
[20] Roschelle J , Lester J, Fusco J. AI and the future of learning: Expert panel report [R/OL].(2020-09)[2023-06-08]. https://circls.org/reports/ai-report.
[21] 江山.人脸识别技术进校园,教育部:加以限制、管理[EB/OL].(2019-09-12)[2023-12-02].https://www.12371.gov.cn/Item/542434.aspx.
[22] UNICEF. Children's rights and business in a digital world: privacy, protection of personal information and reputation rights[EB/OL].(2017-03)[2023-12-13].https://www.unicef.org/csr/files/UNICEF_CRB_Digital_World_Series_PRIVACY.pdf.
[23] Beardsley M , Santos P. Ethics in educational technology research: informing participants on data sharing risks[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology,2019(3):1019-1034.
[24] Connie Loizos. Alt School wants to change how kids learn, but fears have surfaced that it's failings tudents[EB/OL].(2017-11-23)[2023-11-22].https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/22/altschool-wants-to-change-how-kids-learn-but-fears-that-its-failing-students-are-surfacing/.
[25] Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E. The ethics of artificial intelligence[M]//The cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014:316-334.
[26] New schools venture fund. Education technology use in schools[EB/OL].(2020-03)[2023-10-29].https://www.newschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Gallup-Ed-Tech-Use-in-Schools-2.pdf.
[27] Diane R. 5 risks posed by the increasing misuse of technology in schools[EB/OL].(2017-12-29)[2023-11-20].https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-12-29-5-risks-posed-by-the-increasing-misuse-of-technology-in-schools.
[28] Office of educational technology. ED tech developers'guide[EB/OL].[2023-06-12].https://tech.ed.gov/developers-guide/.
[29] National Institute of Standards and Technology. U.S. leadership in AI: a plan for rederal engagement in developing technical standards and related tools[EB/OL].(2019-08-09)[2023-06-22].https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2019/08/10/ai_standards_fedengagement_plan_9aug2019.pdf.
[30] Christopher S, Alicia L. Regulation of algorithmic tools in the United States[J].Journal of Law and Economic Regulation,2020,13(2):7-22.
[31] ACM. Statement on algorithmic transparency and accountability[EB/OL].(2017-01-12)[2023-06-08].https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/public-policy/2017_usacm_statement_algorithms.pdf.
[32] Jones Day. Proposed algorithmic accountability act targets bias in artificial intelligence[EB/OL].(2019-06)[2023-10-26].https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2019/06/proposed-algorithmic-accountability-act.
[33] Privacy Technical Assistance Center. Protecting studentprivacy while usingonline educational services guidance[EB/OL].[2023-03-15].https://georgiainsights.gadoe.org/Data-Collections/Documents/Data%20Collection%20Website/FY2017/Model%20Terms%20of%20Service.pdf.
[34] Privacy Technical Assistance Center. Best practices for data destruction guide[EB/OL].(2014-05)[2023-05-25].https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED585293.pdf.
[35] US Department of Education. Family educational rights and privacy act[EB/OL].[2023-09-12].https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/ferpa.html#print.
[36] Common Sense. Student online personal information protection act[EB/OL].(2014-09)[2023-08-18].https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/about-us/our-issues/digital-life/sopipa.
[37] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育信息化2.0行动计划[EB/OL].(2018-04-25)[2023-09-10].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
[38] 吉翔.松鼠AI 2020年:超1000万学生注册总营收突破20亿[EB/OL].(2021-01-25)[2023-09-10].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1689841191943619998&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[39] 苗逢春,Holmes, Wayne H, et al.AI and education: guidance for policy-makers[M]. Paris: UNESCO,2021:25-28.
[40] Pardo A, Siemens G. Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics[J]. Educ. Technol,2014,45(3):438-450.
[41] ACT-IAC. Ethical application of artificial intelligence framework[EB/OL].(2020-10-08)[2023-11-12]. https://www.actiac.org/system/files/Ethical%20Application%20of%20AI%20Framework_0.pdf.
[42] 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 新一代人工智能伦理规范[EB/OL].(2021-09-26)[2023-06-12].https://www.safea.gov.cn/kjbgz/202109/t20210926_177063.html.
[43] 杜静,黄荣怀,李政璇,等.智能教育时代下人工智能伦理的内涵与建构原则[J].电化教育研究,2019(7):21-29.
[44] 邓国民,李梅.教育人工智能伦理问题与伦理原则探讨[J].电化教育研究,2020(6):39-45.
[45] 王岚,王凯.教育中的人工智能:应用、风险与治理研究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2020(6):45-49.
[46] 赵磊磊,吴小凡,赵可云.责任伦理:教育人工智能风险治理的时代诉求[J].电化教育研究,2022(6):32-38.
[47] Yadegaridehkordi E, Noor N, Ayub M B, et al. Affective computing in education: a systematic review and future research[J]. Computers & education, 2019,142(9):103649.
[1] 李倩雯. 课程史的元话语：基于《美国课程斗争（1893—1958）》的历史哲学反思[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 57(3): 86-96.
[2] 刘建江, 李诗. 新冠疫情冲击下美国再工业化战略举措及前景研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(6): 129-145.
[3] 王瑜, 叶雨欣. 20世纪以来美国基础教育扶贫政策公平价值观述评[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(3): 132-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发