“人工智能+”背景下算法正义的解构、检视与实现——以权利衡平为视角

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.04.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “人工智能+”行动对算法发展提出了要求,也改变了实现算法正义的衡量标准。算法正义与权利具有内在相关性,维护和发展权利是算法正义的内涵要义。算法发展应先行化解算法领域内的权利冲突,权利衡平对算法正义有重要的评判价值。目前算法应用中呈现的破坏平等、违反自由、威胁安全等正义偏离情形,其实质是因权利被剥夺、权利被侵害或侵权救济困难而引发的权利失衡。实现算法正义,应以法律构建权利衡平的规范体系、以伦理确立权利衡平的行为准则、以技术保障权利衡平的具体实施,确立三位一体的系统性算法正义实现进路,以更加契合“人工智能+”的要求。

关键词: 算法正义, 权利冲突, 权利失衡, 权利衡平, 算法相对人

Abstract: The “AI+” initiative has put forward requirements for the advancement of algorithms, and also changed the metrics for assessing the algorithmic justice. Algorithmic justice is intrinsically related to rights with the maintenance and expansion of rights serving as the essence of algorithmic justice. First and foremost, the development of algorithms should address the issue of rights conflicts within the realm of algorithms. Moreover, equitable rights hold significant value in evaluating the algorithmic justice. Currently, the disparities of justice in algorithmic applications, including the erosion of equality, infringement of freedom, and threats to security, essentially arise from the imbalance of rights resulting from the deprivation, infringement, or difficulty of obtaining redress for rights. In order to actualize the algorithmic justice, it is imperative to establish a legal normative system for right equity, develop an ethical code of conduct for right equity, and ensure the specific implementation of right equity through technological means. This three-in-one systematic approach will facilitate a more effective realization of algorithm justice, thereby better addressing the demands of the “AI+” initiative .

Key words: algorithmic justice, conflict of rights, imbalance of rights, equity of rights, algorithmic counterpart

中图分类号: D63-31

朱腾伟. “人工智能+”背景下算法正义的解构、检视与实现——以权利衡平为视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(4): 42-52.

ZHU Teng-wei. Deconstruction, Inspection and Implementation of Algorithmic Justice in the Context of “AI+” Initiative: A perspective of Equity of Rights[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(4): 42-52.

参考文献

[1] 苏宇.算法规制的谱系[J].中国法学,2020(3):165-184.
[2] [美]E.博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
[3] 葛洪义.法理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.
[4] [英]奈杰尔·西蒙兹,[澳]约书亚·尼奥.法理学的核心问题:正义、法律与权利[M].王保民,姚志奋,赵晓英,译.北京:法律出版社,2023.
[5] 丁晓东.基于信任的自动化决策:算法解释权的原理反思与制度重构[J].中国法学,2022(1):99-118.
[6] 张欣.免受自动化决策约束权的制度逻辑与本土构建[J].华东政法大学学报,2021(5):27-40.
[7] 马拥军.大数据时代的社会公正——兼评赫拉利的《未来简史》[J].青年学报,2018(1):19-25.
[8] 韩水法.人工智能时代的人文主义[J].中国社会科学,2019(6):25-44.
[9] 郑玉双.计算正义:算法与法律之关系的法理建构[J].政治与法律,2021(11):91-104.
[10] 章安邦.人工智能时代的司法权嬗变[J].浙江工商大学学报,2020(4):149-160.
[11] [美]霍菲尔德.基本法律概念[M].张书友,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2009.
[12] 李琼.权利边界、冲突及其衡平[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(1):135-138.
[13] 沈宗灵.法理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[14] 洪丹娜.算法歧视的宪法价值调适:基于人的尊严[J].政治与法律,2020(8):27-37.
[15] 孙伟平.价值哲学视域中的算法歧视与社会公正[J].哲学研究,2023(3):46-125.
[16] 孙逸啸,郑浩然.算法治理的域外经验与中国进路[J].信息安全研究,2021(1):15-26.
[17] 胡小伟.人工智能时代算法风险的法律规制论纲[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(2):120-131.
[18] [美]弗兰克·帕斯奎尔.黑箱社会:控制金钱和信息的数据法则[M].赵亚男,译.北京:中信出版社,2015.
[19] 江溯.自动化决策、刑事司法与算法规制——由卢米斯案引发的思考[J].东方法学,2020(3):76-88.
[20] 陈鹏.算法的权力:应用与规制[J].浙江社会科学,2019(4):52-58.
[21] Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller,et al. A computer program used for bail and sentencing decisions was labeled biased against blacks. It’s actually not that clear[EB/OL]. (2016-10-17)[2024-03-23].https://www.washington post.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/10/17/can-an-algorithm-be-racist-our-analysis-is-more-cautious-than-propublicas/no redirect=on.
[22] 陈敏,孙占利.算法“黑箱”的技术与法治耦合治理[J].法治论坛,2022(4):3-18.
[23] 金梦.立法伦理与算法正义——算法主体行为的法律规制[J].政法论坛,2021(1):29-40.
[24] [英]凯伦·杨,马丁·洛奇.驯服算法:数字歧视与算法规制[M].林少伟,唐林垚,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2020.
[25] 李成.人工智能歧视的法律治理[J].中国法学,2021(2):127-147.
[26] Davide Castelvecchi. Can we open the black box of AI?[J]. Nature, 2016,538(7623): 20-23.
[27] 任颖.算法规制的立法论研究[J].政治与法律,2022(9):98-111.
[28] 郑志峰.人工智能立法的一般范畴[J].数字法治,2023(6):55-75.
[29] 袁康.社会监管理念下金融科技算法黑箱的制度因应[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):102-110.
[30] 梁志文.论算法排他权:破除算法偏见的路径选择[J].政治与法律,2020(8):94-106.
[31] 孙建丽.算法自动化决策风险的法律规制研究[J].法治研究,2019(4):108-117.
[32] 丁晓东.算法与歧视——从美国教育平权案看算法伦理与法律解释[J].中外法学,2017(6):1609-1623.
[33] 刘培,池忠军.算法的伦理问题及其解决进路[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2):118-125.
[34] 王德夫.论人工智能算法的法律属性与治理进路[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(5):29-40.
[35] Desai D R,Kroll J A. Trust but verify: a guide to algorithms and the law[J]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Fall, 2017.
[36] 张凌寒,于琳.从传统治理到敏捷治理:生成式人工智能的治理范式革新[J].电子政务,2023(9):2-13.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed