Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 1-11.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.02.001

    Next Articles

The Settlement of Tang and the Route of Tang Attacking Jie ——A study Based on the New Clues from Bamboo Slips Collected by Tsinghua University

CHEN Min-zhen   

  1. Unearthed Research and Protection Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2017-11-23 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-07-13

Abstract: New evidence of the place of Tang’s provenience and the route of his attacking Jie is found on the bamboo slips, collected by Tsinghua University, in the chapters Yin Zhi, Yin Gao and Tang lives in Tangqiu. According to the chapter of Xi Nian, the actual location of Tangqiu indicates to be Kangqiu, the first fief of Weishufeng which locates in the Yin Dynasty ruins in Anyang, instead of Dangqiu or Shangqiu. Taking the archaeological knowledge, the 14C dating datum, the documents and the war situation into consideration, it was found that Tang’s capital Bo was in north Henan before the war, while Xia’s capital Xiyixia was in south Shanxi, therefore the Erlitou Site may not be Zhenxun, which has long been recognized as the capital of the Xia Dynasty. The main reason of Tang’s attacking on Wei, Gu and Kunwu was to expand its core area of pre-Shang culture in north Henan. Finally, Tang allied with Youshen, who lived in Heyang, Shanxi, to attack Xiyixia from Hequ, written as “to attack Xiyi from the west”.

Key words: Tang, Tangqiu, Kangqiu, Xiyixia, Bo

CLC Number: 

  • K223
[1] 李守奎.汉代伊尹文献的分类与清华简中伊尹诸篇的性质[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015(3).
[2] 李学勤.清华大学藏战国竹简(伍)[M].上海:中西书局,2015.
[3] 沈建华.楚简“唐丘”与晋南夏商遗迹考[C]//李学勤.出土文献(第6辑).上海:中西书局,2015.
[4] 刘成群.清华简《汤处于汤丘》与商汤始居地考辨[J].人文杂志,2015(9).
[5] 王恩田.清华简“汤丘”与“汤社”[EB/OL].复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心网站,2015-03-05.
[6] 王宁.清华简“汤丘”为“商丘”说[EB/OL].复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心网站,2015-02-22.
[7] 华东师范大学中文系出土文献研究工作室.读《清华大学藏战国竹简(伍)》书后(三)[EB/OL].武汉大学简帛研究中心网站,2015-04-17.
[8] 袁广阔.再思二里头文化的来源[N].中国文物报,2005-06-24(7).
[9] 刘起釪.由夏族原居地纵论夏文化始于晋南[C]//田昌五.华夏文明(第1集).北京:北京大学出版社,1987.
[10] 陈昌远.商族起源地望发微——兼论山西垣曲商城发现的意义[J].历史研究,1987(1).
[11] 中国历史博物馆考古部,等.垣曲商城[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
[12] 张雪莲,等.新砦—二里头—二里冈文化考古年代序列的建立完善[J].考古,2007(8).
[13] 邹衡.夏商周考古学论文集[C].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[14] 郑州大学历史学院考古系.豫东商丘地区考古调查简报[J].华夏考古,2005(2).
[15] 李学勤.清华大学藏战国竹简(贰)[M].上海:中西书局,2011.
[16] 李学勤.由清华简《系年》重释沬司徒疑鼎[J].中国高校社会科学,2013(3).
[17] 路懿菡.从清华简《系年》看康叔的始封[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(4).
[18] 朱凤瀚.清华简《系年》所记西周史事考[C]//李宗焜.出土材料与新视野:第四届国际汉学会议论文集.台北:“中央研究院”,2013.
[19] 苏建洲,吴雯雯,赖怡璇.清华二《系年》集解[M].台北:万卷楼,2013.
[20] 董珊.简帛文献考释论丛[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.
[21] 夏商周断代工程朝歌遗址调查组.1998年鹤壁市、淇县晚商遗址考古调查报告[J].华夏考古,2006(1).
[22] 杨升南.殷墟与洹水[J].史学月刊,1985(5).
[23] 中国社会科学院考古研究所安阳工作队.河南安阳殷墟刘家庄北地殷墓与西周墓[J].考古,2005(1).
[24] 刘琼.商汤都亳研究综述[J].南方文物,2010(4).
[25] 张雪莲,仇士华,蔡莲珍.郑州商城和偃师商城的碳十四年代分析[J].中原文物,2005(1).
[26] 杨育彬.从近年的考古新发现谈偃师商城和郑州商城的几个问题[J].中原文物,1992(3).
[27] 江林昌.夏商周文明新探[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001.
[28] 王国维.说亳[C]//观堂集林(第2册).北京:中华书局,1959.
[29] 姜寅虎.对二里头遗址最新测年报告的学术思考[C]//杜金鹏,许宏.二里头遗址与二里头文化研究:中国·二里头遗址与二里头文化国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2006.
[30] 杨宽.商代的别都制度[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1984(1).
[31] 李学勤.清华大学藏战国竹简(壹)[M].上海:中西书局,2010.
[32] 廖名春.清华简与《尚书》研究[J].文史哲,2010(6).
[33] 罗琨.读《尹至》“自夏徂亳”[C]//李学勤.出土文献(第2辑).上海:中西书局,2011.
[34] 王志平.清华简《说命》中的几个地名[C]//武汉大学简帛研究中心.简帛(第9辑).上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.
[35] 肖芸晓.试论清华竹书伊尹三篇的关联[C]//武汉大学简帛研究中心.简帛(第8辑).上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[36] 江林昌.《商颂》与商汤之亳[J].历史研究,2000(5).
[37] [汉]宋衷,[清]秦嘉谟,等.世本八种[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[38] 王震中.甲骨文亳邑新探[J].历史研究,2004(5).
[39] 黄怀信.由清华简《尹诰》看《古文尚书》[J].鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(6).
[40] 刘国忠.走近清华简[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
[41] 冯时.《保训》故事与地中之变迁[J].考古学报,2015(2).
[42] 王震中.商族起源与先商社会变迁[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010.
[43] 程一凡.亳与偃师二遗址的关系[C]//杜金鹏,许宏.二里头遗址与二里头文化研究:中国·二里头遗址与二里头文化国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2006.
[44] 邹衡.偃师商城即太甲桐宫说[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1984(4).
[45] 沈建华.清华楚简《尹至》释文试解[J].中国史研究,2011(1).
[46] 王宁.清华简《尹至》、《尹诰》中“西邑”和“西邑夏”的问题[EB/OL].简帛研究网,2011-01-19.
[47] 蔡哲茂.夏王朝存在新证——说殷卜辞的“西邑”[J].中国文化,2016(3).
[48] 胡厚宣.殷卜辞中的上帝和王帝(上)[J].历史研究,1959(9).
[49] 许宏.关于二里头为早商都邑的假说[J].南方文物,2015(3).
[50] 中国社会科学院考古研究所,山西省临汾市文物局.襄汾陶寺——1978~1985年考古发掘报告(第2册)[M].北京:文物出版社,2015.
[51] 丁山.由三代都邑论其民族文化[J].中央研究院历史语言研究所集刊,1935(1).
[52] 徐旭生.1959年夏豫西调查“夏墟”的初步报告[J].考古,1959(11).
[53] 杜金鹏.商汤伐桀之史实与其历史地理问题[J].史学月刊,1988(1).
[54] 王宁.上博二《容成氏》汤伐桀记载辨析[EB/OL].复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心网站,2015-03-11.
[55] 郑杰祥.商汤伐桀路线新探[J].中原文物,2007(2).
[56] 单育辰.新出楚简《容成氏》研究[M].北京:中华书局,2016.
[57] 罗琨.楚竹书本《荣成氏》与商汤伐桀再探讨[C]//宋镇豪.甲骨文与殷商史(新1辑).北京:线装书局,2008.
[58] 李零.西伯戡黎的再认识——读清华楚简《耆夜》篇[C]//陈致.简帛·古史·经典.上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[59] 杨升南.汤放桀之役中的几个地理问题[C]//胡厚宣.全国商史学术讨论会论文集(《殷都学刊》增刊).安阳:《殷都学刊》编辑部,1985.
[1] YUAN Chao. The System Logic and Function Optimization of the Advisory and Coordinating Bodies in the New Era from the Perspective of “Political Potential Energy” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 41-50.
[2] WU Bin, CAO Li-ping, WO Peng-fei. The Composite Policy of Carbon Tax and Carbon Emission Trading: the Experience and Inspiration from the European Union [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 84-94.
[3] CHEN Chun. Scientific Approaches, the Origin of Civilization and the Argument about the History of the Xia Dynasty [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 128-140.
[4] TANG Zheng-dong. The Division of Capital and Labor under the Condition of Private Ownership and Its Irrationality——Young Engels’ Thoughts on Labor-Management Relations and Their Evaluation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 1-10.
[5] ZHANG Li-Da, TANG Shi-Ru. A Philosophical Reflection on the Boundary of Barrage Culture [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(5): 53-58.
[6] YANG Xing-feng. Marx’s Categories of Time [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(4): 21-27.
[7] QU Jing-yi, WANG Zhi-tian. Approaching Tang Shi Yan Yi Pin from Its Editions and Documents: Discussion on Its Characteristics as a Late Ming Commercial Publication [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(3): 20-29.
[8] WANG Zhao-sheng. A Study on Lin Yutang’s Contribution to the May Fourth New Culture [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(2): 1-9.
[9] TONG Jian-ping. A Study of Xin Bian Shi Wen Lei Ju Qi Zha Yun Jin, A Classic of Yuan Dynasty in National Library [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(2): 10-17.
[10] YOU Xin-wei. The Logic of Alienated Labor and Its Liberation ——Two Different Theoretical Approaches Employed in Marx’s Paris Manuscripts [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(2): 44-49.
[11] WU Wen-wen. Study on Ideological System of Laozi’s Political Philosophy——Based on Collations and Explanations of First Chapter of Bamboo Slips in The Han Dynasty Lao Tse Shang Jing Collected by Peking University [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 16-26.
[12] LIU Xiao-ming. A Comparative Study on the Inscriptions on Bronze Mirrors in the Han and Tang Dynasties [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 27-32.
[13] REN Yun-chang. Study on the Problem of Boarding Education for Left-behind Children in High Schools: Based on the Analysis of 15 Related Documents [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 74-80.
[14] DING Hong-qi. The Prosperity of Wen-xuan Study in the Mid-Tang Dynasty [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 118-127.
[15] ZHOU Chun-yan. The Refutation of "Nine Debates is the Work in Han Dynasty" -the Issues of Applicability in Identifying the Creation Time of Ancient Books Through the History of Chinese Vocabulary [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 132-137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 0, (): 1 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .