Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 36-53.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2019.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Implementation Capability of the Grass-roots River Chiefs——An Empirical Analysis of “the last mile of the policy”

YAN Hai-na,WANG Si-ning   

  1. School of Politics and Public Administration,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China
  • Received:2019-07-03 Published:2020-01-17

Abstract: The grass-roots river chiefs (river chiefs of village committee and neighborhood committee) as the street bureaucrats of the “first line of water governance”, assume the resonsibilities of “the last mile of the policy” and their implementation greatly influence the running effect of the river chief system. However, the news about the difficulties of policy execution at the grass-roots level, and the selective implementation of the grass-roots river chiefs are often reported from time to time. How is the implementation capability of the grass-roots river chiefs in water environment governance? Why is it blocked? This paper explores the implementation capability of the grass-roots river chiefs and its influencing factors,using the questionnaire data of the whole staff (a total of 1472 valid samples) in City S from the perspective of their perception . The results are as follows. First , in general,implementation capability of the grass-roots river chiefs of the City S is unsatisfactory and their working enthusiasm is frustrated; Second, institutional support and integration of power and responsibility have a significant positive correlation with implementation capability of grass-roots rivers; Third ,the workload has a significant negative impact on implementation capability of the grass-roots river chiefs. The problem of “the last mile of the policy” raises our rethinking of “the role overload under the dual role” and “information asymmetry under the agency.”

Key words: the River Chief System, the grass-roots river chiefs, implementation capability

CLC Number: 

  • D63-31
[1] Micheal Lipsky. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation,1980,P3.
[2] 莫勇波.提升地方政府政策执行力的路径选择——基于制度创新角度的探析[J].云南行政学院学报,2005(6):63.
[3] 周国雄.论公共政策执行力[J].探索与争鸣,2007(6):34.
[4] 丁煌,周丽婷.地方政府公共政策执行力的提升——基于多中心治理视角的思考[J].江苏行政学院学报,2013(3):112-118.
[5] 邓晰隆,陈娟.“公共政策选择性执行”问题及其对策研究[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2006(4):55-57.
[6] 熊润露,徐蕾.我国基层政府政策执行力的提高途径[J].法制与社会,2019(7):149-150.
[7] 丁煌.政策制定的科学性与政策执行的有效性[J].南京社会科学,2002(1):38-44.
[8] 吴开松,杨爱琴.公共政策执行及其系统治理研究——基于公共政策“立交桥”现象分析[J].学习与实践,2018(6):58-64.
[9] 杨京芳. 我国政府执行力的现状与对策[J]. 行政与法,2007(5):16-19.
[10] 李金龙,武俊伟.社会建构理论视域下我国基层政府政策执行的难题及其求解[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2016,18(5):491-497.
[11] 定明捷,卜方宇.压力情境下街头官僚应对策略选择的逻辑分析[J].公共管理与政策评论,2018,7(4):57-69.
[12] 左宏愿,张文静.基层公务员的政策执行:结构脉络中的策略性选择[J].党政研究,2019(1):112-120.
[13] 梁莉丹. 公共政策选择性执行的原因及防治对策研究[D].西安:西北大学公共管理学院,2004.
[14] 王春福.公共精神与政府执行力[J].理论探讨, 2007(1):107-110.
[15] 宁国良,邓瑞芬.执行主体选择性执行公共政策的心理因素分析[J].湖北社会科学,2009(7):28-30.
[16] 陈伟.地方政府执行力:概念、问题与出路——基于公共精神和行政伦理的分析[J].社会主义研究,2014(3):68-74.
[17] 孔凡河.公共精神:政府执行力的价值跃迁引擎——基于国家治理的视角[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2016,33(4):98-111.
[18] 韩志明.街头官僚的行动逻辑与责任控制[J].公共管理学报,2008(1):41-48+121-122.
[19] 李旭琴.街头官僚在公共政策执行中的偏差及矫正[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,9(3):50-54.
[20] 张力伟.国家治理视域下的街头官僚素描——基于L省K市基层环境治理的田野调查[J].地方治理研究,2018(3):11-29+78.
[21] 郑思齐,万广华,孙伟增,罗党论.公众诉求与城市环境治理[J].管理世界,2013(6):72-84.
[22] 陈奇星,赵勇. 技术因素:提升政府执行力的重要环节[J]. 中国行政管理,2008(7):66-68.
[23] 刘升.信息权力:理解基层政策执行扭曲的一个视角——以A市中街城管执法为例[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):145-153+162.
[24] [美]马克·格兰诺维特.镶嵌: 社会网和经济行动[M].罗家德,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007:8.
[25] 周建国,熊烨.“河长制”:持续创新何以可能——基于政策文本和改革实践的双维度分析[J].江苏社会科学,2017(4):38-47.
[26] 熊烨,周建国.政策转移中的政策再生产:影响因素与模式概化——基于江苏省“河长制”的QCA分析[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2017(1):37-47.
[27] 任敏.“河长制”:一个中国政府流域治理跨部门协同的样本研究[J].北京行政学院学报,2015(3):25-31.
[28] 郝亚光.“河长制”设立背景下地方主官水治理的责任定位[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(5):13-18.
[29] 肖显静.“河长制”:一个有效而非长效的制度设置[J].环境教育,2009(5):24-25.
[30] 冉冉.“压力型体制”下的政治激励与地方环境治理[J].经济社会体制比较,2013(3):111-118.
[31] 李波,于水.达标压力型体制:地方水环境河长制治理的运作逻辑研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2018(2):41-47.
[32] 李正升.从行政分割到协同治理:我国流域水污染治理机制创新[J].学术探索,2014(9):57-61.
[33] 王伟,李巍.河长制:流域整体性治理的样本研究[J].领导科学,2018(17):16-19.
[34] 颜海娜,曾栋.河长制水环境治理创新的困境与反思——基于协同治理的视角[J].北京行政学院学报,2019(2):7-17.
[35] 赖慧苏.多重激励机制下的基层政府行为研究——以GC县河长制实施为例[J].四川环境,2019,38(1):170-174.
[36] 胡雪林,肖养群.浅析基层河长制实践中的几个问题[J].中国水利,2018(10):19-20+11.
[37] 薄传梅,裴学军,周迎奎.基层河长制湖长制工作探索与实践[J].水利技术监督,2019(3):82-84+137.
[38] Van Meter D & Van Horn C. The Policy Implementation Process :A Conceptual Framework [J].Administration & Society ,1975,6(4):445-448.
[39] [美]理查德·斯科特.制度与组织——思想观念与物质利益》第3版[M].姚伟,王黎芳,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:67-71.
[40] Bovens, Mark & Stavros Zouridis. From Street-level to System-level Bureaucracies[ J]. Public Administration Review,2002, 62(2): 174-184.
[41] 叶娟丽,马骏.公共行政中的街头官僚理论[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(5):612-618.
[42] 刘芳雄,何婷英,周玉珠.治理现代化语境下“河长制”法治化问题探析[J].浙江学刊,2016(6):120-123.
[43] 王鸿铭,黄云卿,杨光斌.中国环境政治考察:从权威管控到有效治理[J].江汉论坛,2017(3):113-118.
[44] 李宇.电子政务信息整合与共享的制约因素及对策研究[J].中国行政管理,2009(4):84-85.
[45] 冉冉.环境议题的政治建构与中国环境政治中的集权—分权悖论[J].马克思主义与现实,2014,(4):161-167.
[46] Burden,B C,Canon,D T,Mayer K R & Moynihan D P. The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies:evidence from electionadministration[J].Public Administration Review,2012,(72):741-751.
[47] Chan,H S & Gao,Jie. Putting the Cart before the Horse: Accountability or Performance?[J]. The Australian Journal of Public Administration , 2009 , 68(11):51-61.
[48] 阎波,吴建南.绩效问责与乡镇政府回应行为——基于Y乡案例的分析[J].江苏行政学院学报,2012(2):109-115.
[49] 郭蕊.权责一致:异化与纠正[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009,33(2):28-31.
[50] 麻宝斌,郭蕊.权责一致与权责背离:在理论与现实之间[J].政治学研究,2010(1):72-78.
[51] 赵炎峰.城镇化背景下基层政府权责伦理的重构与职能转变[J].领导科学,2018(17):13-15.
[52] 颜海娜.技术嵌入协同治理的执行边界——以S市“互联网+治水”为例[J].探索,2019(4):144-155.
[53] 艾云.上下级政府间“考核检查”与“应对”过程的组织学分析——以A县“计划生育”年终考核为例[J].社会,2011,31(3):68-87.
[54] 褚添有. 社会治理机制:概念界说及其框架构想[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(2):42-45.
[1] LI Wen-zhao. Actor-centered Institutionalism: Exploring the Interaction Effect in Policy Process [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 19-42.
[2] YUE Xue-lian, LI Chang. Analysison the Supply Problem of Public Service for Migrant Population in Western Cities under the New Pattern Urbanization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 196-200.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .