Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 19-42.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.03.003
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Wen-zhao
CLC Number:
| [1] Scharpf F W, Mayntz R. Policy making in the German federal bureaucracy[M]. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier, 1975. [2] Scharpf F W. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research[M]. Routledge, 1997. [3] Lasswell H D. The emerging conception of the policy sciences[J]. Policy sciences, 1970,1(1):3-14. [4] 李文钊. 公共政策研究的范式变迁及其超越[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2019(4):98-107. [5] Weimer D L, Vining A R. Policy analysis: Concepts and practice[M]. Routledge, 2017. [6] Farr J, Hacker J S, Kazee N. The policy scientist of democracy: The discipline of Harold D. Lasswell[J]. American Political Science Review, 2006,100(4): 579-587. [7] Fischer F, Forester J The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning[C]. Duke University Press,1993. [8] Fischer F. Evaluating Public Policy[M]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1995. [9] Fischer F, Gottweis H. The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice[C]. Duke University Press, 2012. [10] 李文钊.论作为认知、行为与规范的制度[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2017(2):5-20. [11] Scharpf F W. Community and autonomy: institutions, policies and legitimacy in multilevel Europe[M]. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag, 2010. [12] Scharpf F W. Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity[J]. European Political Science Review, 2009,1(2):173-204. [13] Shepsle A Kenneth. Analyzing Politics: rationality, behavior, and institutions[M]. New York:W.W. Norton & Company, 2020. [14] March J G. How decisions happen in organizations[J]. Human-computer interaction, 1991, 6(2): 95-117. [15] Simon H A. The sciences of the artificial[M]. MIT press, 1996. [16] Searle J R. What is an institution? [J]. Journal of institutional economics, 2005, 1(1):1-22. [17] Baumgartner F R, Jones B D. The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America[M]. University of Chicago Press,2015. [18] Kreps D M. Game theory and economic modelling[M]. Oxford University Press, 1990. [19] Crawford S E, Ostrom E. A grammar of institutions[J]. American political science review, 1995,89(3): 582-600. [20] Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action[M]. Cambridge university press, 1990. [21] Dahl R A, Lindblom C E. Politics, economics and welfare: planning and politico-economic systems, resolved into basic processes[M]. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953. [22] Hayek F A. The constitution of liberty: The definitive edition[M]. Routledge, 2013. [23] Schotter A. The economic theory of social institutions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. [24] Lindblom C E. The science of “muddling through”[J]. Public administration review, 1959,19(2):79-88. [25] Coase R H. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960(3):1-44. [26] Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R. Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible[J]. American political science Review, 1992, 86(2):404-417. [27] Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2008, 78(6):1360-13. [28] Buchanan J M, Tullock G. The calculus of consent (Vol. 3)[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press, 1962. [29] Downs A. An economic theory of political action in a democracy[J]. Journal of political economy, 1957, 65(2):135-150. [30] Arrow K J. Social choice and individual values (Vol. 12)[M]. Yale university press, 2012. [31] Shepsle K. A. Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 23(1):27-59. [32] Tuomela R. Social ontology: Collective intentionality and group agents[M]. Oxford University Press, 2013. [33] Simon H A. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization[M]. New York: Free Press, 1947. [34] Williamson O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, markets, relational Contracting[M]. Free Press, 1985. [35] Hayek F A. The use of knowledge in society[J]. The American economic review, 1945, 35(4):519-530. [36] 安东尼·吉登斯. 社会的构成[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998. [37] 谢立中.结构-制度分析,还是过程-事件分析?——从多元话语分析的视角看[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(4): 12-31. [38] 肖瑛.从“国家与社会”到“制度与生活”:中国社会变迁研究的视角转换[J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(9):88-104. [39] 吴晓林.结构依然有效:迈向政治社会研究的“结构-过程”分析范式[J]. 政治学研究, 2017(2):96-108. [40] 高奇琦, 张鹏.英国“脱欧”与欧洲一体化前景:一种新结构政治学的分析[J]. 探索, 2019, 205(1):81-93. [41] Scharpf F W. Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic?[M]. Oxford University Press, 1999. [42] 周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J]. 经济研究, 2007(7):37-51. [43] 周雪光, 练宏.政府内部上下级部门间谈判的一个分析模型——以环境政策实施为例[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(5):81-97. [44] 周雪光, 练宏.中国政府的治理模式:一个“控制权”理论[J]. 社会学研究, 2012 (5):69-93. [45] 渠敬东.项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5):113-130+207. [46] Scharpf F W. The joint‐decision trap revisited[J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2006, 44(4):845-864. [47] Falkner G. The EU’s decision traps: comparing policies[C]. OUP Oxford, 2011. [48] Hwang H, Colyvas J A, Drori G S. Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority[C]. Emerald Group Publishing, 2019. |
| [1] | ZHOU Kan, ZHANG Jing. A Study on the Court Actors of the Tang Dynasty [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 160-165. |
| [2] | LU Hai-yang. On the Prevalence of Jiangnan Area’s Parallel Prose in the Qing Dynasty and Its Causes [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 92-98. |
| [3] | WANG Shou-yan. On the Diffusion of Christianity and Its Social Bases in Rural Areas of China: A Survey on the Female Christians in F Village [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 121-127. |
| [4] | LIU Jun-jie,YE Yun-zui. On Factors Affecting Urban Residents' Consumption: An Empirical Analysis on Guangxi [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 15-22. |
|