Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 32-49.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.01.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

How Can the Model That “the Weak Collaborates with the Strong” Work Well? —A Case Study Based on the “Procedural-Cognitive” Framework

XU Guo-chong1, XIA Yu2, LIU Yan-song3   

  1. 1. School of Public Affairs,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005;
    2. School of Public Policy & Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
    3. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2023-06-10 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-26

Abstract: The new century witnesses the “New Public Management Movement” moving towards “cooperative governance”, but cooperation itself does not run automatically. In the context of mandatory cooperation, the strategies adopted by weak sectors to establish internal legitimacy and promote sincere cooperation with strong sectors have not drawn sufficient attention according to current literature, hence a need of an in-depth exploration of the specific implementation. Therefore, the article adopts the relatively fragmented paths of political science and organizational management in collaborative governance research, and integrates the two independent paths of program and cognition into two different levels of understanding internal legitimacy, thus constructing a “program-cognition” analysis framework for weak sectors to establish internal legitimacy; the article further takes the inter-departmental cooperation of school sports facilities’ opening to the public in X city as a typical case, with an aim to explore the strategies adopted by weak sectors to gain internal legitimacy in promoting cooperation with strong sectors. The results indicate that vertical authoritative and social needs can bring strong external legitimacy to weak sectors, while the construction of internal legitimacy requires three stages of procedures: dialogue and participation, negotiation and commitment agreements, accompanied by the development of three cognitive levels of shared understanding, understanding and trust, and internal identification. The strategies that work well in the constraint scenario of “the weak collaborating with the strong” will have a broader scope for implementation under relaxed constraints or other supportive conditions.

Key words: public management, collaborative governance, legitimacy, program cognition, inter-departmental cooperation, weak sectors

CLC Number:  D035
[1] Hofstad H, Torfing J. Collaborative innovation as a tool for environmental, economic and social sustainability in regional governance[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 2016,9(4): 49-70.
[2] Kenis P, Provan K G. The control of public networks[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2006,9(3): 227-247.
[3] 胡颖廉.差序异构:政府职能边界模糊的新解释——以市场监管部门为例[J].新视野,2022(1):81-87.
[4] 刘杰,贺东航.造“势”:新中国成立初期防疫运动中的官僚动员[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):103-112.
[5] O’toole L J, Meier K J. Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching structural networks and managerial networking[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 2004,14(4):469-494.
[6] 马克斯·韦伯. 韦伯作品集(Ⅲ):支配社会学[M]. 康乐,简惠美,译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2004: 19.
[7] Maurer J G. Readings in organizational theory: open system approaches[M]. New York: Random House,1971:7-11.
[8] Dowling J, Pfeffer J. Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior[J]. Pacific Sociological Review,1975, 18(1): 122-136.
[9] Parsons T. Structure and process in modern societies[M]. Glencoe, IL: Free Press,1960:175.
[10] Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):571-610.
[11] 徐岩,范娜娜,陈那波. 合法性承载:对运动式治理及其转变的新解释——以A市18年创卫历程为例[J]. 公共行政评论,2015(2):22-46,179.
[12] Provan K G, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18 (2):229-252.
[13] Human S E, Provan K G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: a comparative study of success and demise[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000,45(2):327-365.
[14] Drori I, Honig B. A process model of internal and external legitimacy[J]. Organization Studies, 2013,34(3):345-376.
[15] 赖先进.论政府跨部门协同治理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015:140.
[16] Kostova T, Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(1):64-81.
[17] Lu J W, Xu D. Growth and survival of international joint ventures: an external-internal legitimacy perspective[J]. Journal of Management, 2006,32(3):426-448.
[18] Provan K G, Fish A, Sydow J. Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks[J]. Journal of Management, 2007,33(3):479-516.
[19] Vangen S, Huxham C. Nurturing collaborative relations: building trust in interorganizational collaboration[J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2003,39(1):5-31.
[20] Buchanan A E. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: moral foundations for international law[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,2004:432.
[21] Tyler T. A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities[C]//Jost J T, Major B. The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2001:416.
[22] 塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华,刘为,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:21.
[23] Klijn E H, Edelenbos J. The influence of democratic legitimacy on outcomes in governance networks[J]. Administration & Society, 2012,45(6): 632.
[24] Klign E H, Koppenjan J. Governance networks in the public sector[M]. New York:Routledge,2015: 215.
[25] Klijn E H, Koppenjan J. Governance network theory: past, present and future[J]. Policy & Politics,2012, 40(4):587-606.
[26] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008, 18(4): 557.
[27] Mosley J E, Wong J. Decision-making in collaborative governance networks: pathways to input and throughput legitimacy[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2021, 31(2): 328-345.
[28] Bryson J M, Crosby B C, Stone M M. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature[J]. Public Administration Review,2006, 66(s1): 44-55.
[29] Emerson K, Nabatchi T. Collaborative governance regimes[M]. Washington, D C:Georgetown University Press,2015: 67.
[30] Provan K G, Kenis P, Human S E. Legitimacy building in organizational networks[C]//Bingham L B, Leary R O. Big ideas in collaborative public management. New York:Routledge,2014:130.
[31] Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P. Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2017, 11(1): 459.
[32] Klijn E H, Edelenbos J. Meta-governance as network management[M]//Sørensen E, Torfing J. Theories of democratic network governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007:199-214.
[33] Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012,22(1):1-29.
[34] Koschmann M A, Kuhn T R, Pfarrer M D. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012,37 (3):332-354.
[35] Johnston E W, Hicksy D, Nanz N, et al. Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011,21(4):699-771.
[36] Ring P S, Van De Ven A H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994,19(1): 90-118.
[37] Tsai Fu-Sheng. Composite diversity, social capital, and group knowledge sharing: a case narration[J]. Knowledge Management Research & Practice,2005,3(4): 218-28.
[38] Page S B, Stone M M, Bryson J M, et al. Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: a framework and challenges of assessment[J]. Public Administration,2015,93(3):715-732.
[39] 王富伟.个案研究的意义和限度——基于知识的增长[J].社会学研究,2012(5):161-183,244-245.
[40] Yin R. Case study research design and methods applied social research methods[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2009, 5(1):108.
[41] 蒋敏娟. 中国政府跨部门协同机制研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2016:47.
[42] 王浦劬,赖先进.中国公共政策扩散的模式与机制分析[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科版),2013(6):14-23.
[43] X市人民政府.历年常住人口[EB/OL].(2019-07-19)[2021-12-20]. http://www.xm.gov.cn/zjxm/xmgk/201907/t20190719_2317331.htm.
[44] 香卉辉. X市人均体育场地面积全省第一 设施单一不均衡[EB/OL].(2014-11-07)[2021-12-20]. https://fj.qq.com/a/20141107/019446.htm.
[45] 杨雪冬.简论中国地方政府创新研究的十个问题[J].公共管理学报,2008(1):16-26,120.
[46] 吕普生.我国制度优势转化为国家治理效能的理论逻辑与有效路径分析[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(3):18-33.
[47] 黄六招,顾丽梅,尚虎平.地方公共服务创新是如何生成的?——以“惠企一码通”项目为例[J].公共行政评论,2019(2):143-162,197.
[1] ZHANG Shu-wei, WANG Yan, QIN Xiao-tong. Long Journey Ahead with Obstacles “yields to” Those Who “act and pursue”: the Way of Behavioral Governance in Public Affairs [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 50-68.
[2] Yu Wen-xuan, MA Liang, WANG Dian-li, HAN Zhi-ming, XIE Xin-shui, YE Lin, WEN Hong. Discussion on the Application and Regulation of ChatGPT, the New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 28-53.
[3] LI Wen-bin, CHEN Xiao-xuan. Application and Reflection on the Experimental Method of Public Management:Taking Citizens' Satisfaction as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(5): 79-94.
[4] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.
[5] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.
[6] PAN Jin-quan. Construction of Purity and Party’s Authority [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 58-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DONG Hui, DU Xiao-yi. Chinese Modernization: Dialectical Unity of Both Vitality and Order[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 1 -10 .
[2] CHEN Jia-jian, HONG Jun-bao. The Discourse of Social Governance and Its Local Practice: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of “Fuzzy Policy”[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 11 -20 .
[3] ZANG Lei-zhen, ZHANG Bing-qian, LIU Chao. Inclusive Growth: The Condition and Mechanism for Technological Progress to Promote Common Prosperity —Evidences from Global Macro Panel Data[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 21 -31 .
[4] ZHANG Shu-wei, WANG Yan, QIN Xiao-tong. Long Journey Ahead with Obstacles “yields to” Those Who “act and pursue”: the Way of Behavioral Governance in Public Affairs[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 50 -68 .
[5] ZHAO Ju-jun, PANG Shang-shang. Typological Study and Path Exploration of Local Social Contradiction-Solving Mechanism under the Perspective of Modernization of Social Security Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 69 -82 .
[6] LIU Lei, ZHANG Xin-ya. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Dependence on Creativity and Reflection on the Future Development Path of Education[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 83 -91 .
[7] WU Bian, CHEN Si-si. Visual Learning Analysis for Promoting Teaching and Learning in a Smart Education Environment[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 92 -103 .
[8] MA Wei-hong, SU Xun. How to Define the Corporate “Responsibility” from a Social Perspective?[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 104 -116 .
[9] WEI Zheng-wei, GAO Ya-lin, YANG Chuan. The Impact of Business Environment on Enterprise Innovation —A Research Based on Threshold Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 117 -129 .
[10] WU Da-shun. The Text Communication of Yuefu Poetry and the Style Construction of five-character poems in Han and Wei Dynasties[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 130 -141 .