Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 28-53.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.02.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Discussion on the Application and Regulation of ChatGPT, the New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology

Yu Wen-xuan1, MA Liang2, WANG Dian-li3, HAN Zhi-ming4, XIE Xin-shui5, YE Lin6, WEN Hong7   

  1. 1. School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005;
    2. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    3. School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Jinan 266200;
    4. School of International and Public Affairs/China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030;
    5. School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089;
    6. Center for Chinese Public Administration Research/School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006;
    7. School of Public Administration/Center for Social Governance, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
  • Received:2023-03-08 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-05-25

Abstract: The releasing of ChatGPT, the new generation artificial intelligence technology, in November 2022 has attracted strong global attention and also raised concerns about the challenges posed by technology. In terms of public management, artificial intelligence technology represented by ChatGPT has become a leading force driving fundamental changes and comprehensive reshaping of human social thinking, organizational structure, and operational models, providing new significant opportunities for its innovative path, reshaping form, and promoting development. ChatGPT’s powerful language processing ability dramatically promotes information circulation and cooperation among government organizations, reduces government administrative costs and improves the efficiency and efficiency of public management, and it brings development opportunities for the construction of digital government, promotes the construction of digital government, such as intelligent government citizen interaction, intelligent public services, scientific government decision-making, and even triggers deeper reform of the government. At the same time, the double-edged effect of ChatGPT has also brought huge impacts and risks to public management, prompting people to pay attention to the institutional restructuring and risk regulation in the ChatGPT era, and to think about the reasonable control of its application boundaries. Under the framework of traditional public management that emphasizes the relationship between the government and the market, the application of ChatGPT faces the risk of public value failure, hence a necessary to reconstruct the judgment criteria in the era of artificial intelligence and propose countermeasures for its potential risks. The moral issues of humans themselves, the contradictory mentality of humans towards high-intelligence agents, and the complexity of public life also pose a risk of moral premature death for chat robots represented by ChatGPT, to cope with which, we should uphold humanism and construct value norms in the era of artificial intelligence. The application and development of ChatGPT may bring positive or negative impacts on the increase of labor quality and quantity. Therefore, scientific and effective policies should be designed to promote social progress and enhance public welfare through artificial intelligence, in order to maintain the sustainable development of labor force.

Key words: ChatGPT, artificial intelligence technology, public management, digital government, public value failure, institutional restructuring, risk regulation

[1] 国泰君安证券.ChatGPT研究框架(2023)[R].上海:国泰君安证券股份有限公司,2023.
[2] 王佃利,王铮.城市治理中邻避问题的公共价值失灵:问题缘起、分析框架和实践逻辑[J].学术研究,2018(5):43-51.
[3] 怀进鹏.数字变革与教育未来——在世界数字教育大会上的主旨演讲[N/OL].(2023-02-14)[2023-02-15].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1757770545638864735&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[4] 谭九生,杨建武.人工智能技术的伦理风险及其协同治理[J].中国行政管理,2019(10):44-50.
[5] 潘恩荣,孙宗岭.人工智能“以人为本”伦理准则反思——一种马克思主义哲学的分析思路[J].云南社会科学,2022(6):30-39.
[6] 王长征,彭小兵.技术治理与制度道德[J].自然辩证法研究,2020,36(6):34-39.
[7] Weizenbaum J. ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine[J].Communications of the ACM,1966,9(1): 36-45.
[8] 贾熹滨,李让,胡长建,等.智能对话系统研究综述[J].北京工业大学学报,2017(9):1344-1356.
[9] 王浩畅,李斌.聊天机器人系统研究进展[J].计算机应用与软件,2018(12):1-6,89.
[10] Gao J, Galley M, Li L. Neural approaches to conversational AI[D]. Paper presented at the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. Ann Arbor,2018.
[11] 唐文龙,孙锐.聊天机器人犯错类型与拟人化程度对用户报复性负面口碑的交互作用——愤怒情绪的中介效应[J/OL].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail//11.1403.c.20230214.1730.017.html.
[12] 赵汀阳.人工智能的神话或悲歌[M].北京:商务印书馆,2022.
[13] Neff G, Nagy P. Automation, algorithms, and politics talking to Bots: symbiotic agency and the case of Tay[J]. International Journal of Communication,2016,10(17): 4915-4931.
[14] 毛湛文,郑昱彤.“人机对话”的理想与现实:新闻聊天机器人应用的创新、困境及反思[J].青年记者,2022(22):34-37.
[15] 谢新水.从公共对话到合作治理:基于对话思想遗产的研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2019.
[16] 李邑兰.“请不要对我有过高的期望,我仅是一个AI模型”丨对话ChatGPT[N/OL]. (2023-02-12)[2023-02-23].http://www.infzm.com/contents/243545?source=133&source_1=1.
[17] [日]河野道成.语音界面冲击:人机交互对话的未来与应用[M].范俏莲,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020.
[18] 马克思.资本论(第1 卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
[1] ZHANG Ai-jun. The Possible Dimensions of ChatGPT’s Promoting the Dissemination of Online Politics Paradox [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 54-65.
[2] WU Xiao-lin, Xing Yi-fei. Knowledge Replication or Innovation Stimulation? —Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) for Social Science Graduate Education [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 66-74.
[3] CHEN Zeng-zhao, SHI Ya-wen, WANG Meng-ke. The Realistic Picture of Artificial Intelligence Driving Educational Transformation —An Analysis of Teachers’ Coping Strategies with ChatGPT [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 75-85.
[4] GAO Xiang. Centralization of Decision-making Power and Administrative Bureaucracy: Government Organization Reform in the Digital Ara [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 8-19.
[5] ZHANG Ai-jun, HE Jing-jing. The Empowerment of Digital Political Subjects by the Meta-universe: Performance, Risk and Regulation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 62-71.
[6] LI Wen-bin, CHEN Xiao-xuan. Application and Reflection on the Experimental Method of Public Management:Taking Citizens' Satisfaction as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(5): 79-94.
[7] SONG Ya-hui. A Study on the Linkage Mechanism of Legal Responsibility of Three Branch Laws in Food Ris [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(2): 40-50.
[8] MA Liang. Civil Servants’ Information Technology Capacity and the Construction of Digital Government: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of Urban China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 34-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .