Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 69-82.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Typological Study and Path Exploration of Local Social Contradiction-Solving Mechanism under the Perspective of Modernization of Social Security Governance

ZHAO Ju-jun, PANG Shang-shang   

  1. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2023-07-02 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-26

Abstract: To optimize the local social contradiction-solving mechanism is a practical necessity for preventing social security risks, a must for reducing the cost of social security governance, as well as a basic guarantee for maintaining social justice and stability. Inspired by Weber’s “Ideal Type”, and taking the participation of the Party and government forces and diverse social entities as the basic dimension, this article divides the mechanism for resolving primary-level contradiction into four types: co-construction and co-governance, the Party and government dominance, self-governance, and out-of-control governance. While enhancing research intuitiveness, clarifying the construction and optimization of such mechanism, it also effectively avoids the inherent shortcomings of previous single case studies in terms of representativeness. Following this logic, the paper conducts a specific examination of 23 typical innovative cases (2017—2021), from three aspects: practical content, basic characteristics, and development trends. It then summarizes the practical path to optimize the mechanism: adhering to the “people-centered philosophy” as the fundamental value, optimizing the mechanism, and deepening the modernization of social security governance in terms of deepening the guidance of Party building, promoting the integration of situation and law, and strengthening technological embedding.

Key words: social security, social contradiction-solving mechanism, primary-level governance

CLC Number:  D630
[1] 中共中央宣传部,中央国家安全委员会办公室.总体国家安全观学习纲要[M].北京:学习出版社、人民出版社,2019.
[2] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[N].人民日报,2020-11-04(1).
[3] 中共中央办公厅.关于在全党大兴调查研究的工作方案[EB/OL].(2023-03-19)[2023-03-25].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2023-03/19/content_5747463.htm.
[4] 张文显.习近平法治思想研究(上)——习近平法治思想的鲜明特征[J].法制与社会发展,2016(2):5-21.
[5] 王龙,隋玉龙.公安机关在社会安全治理现代化中的新角色和新机制[J].智库理论与实践,2023(1):159-170.
[6] 章荣君.“微治理”:基层社会矛盾源头预防的有效机制——基于常熟市H社区“微治理”的案例分析[J].理论与改革,2017(4):51-58.
[7] 郭志远.我国基层社会矛盾预防与化解机制创新研究[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):119-129.
[8] 杨华.“政府兜底”:当前农村社会冲突管理中的现象与逻辑[J].公共管理学报,2014(2):115-128,144.
[9] 姚亮.农村社会资本的嬗变与社会矛盾的消解[J].甘肃社会科学,2012(6):20-23.
[10] 陈荣卓,颜慧娟.民生法治视域下农村社区矛盾纠纷治理之道[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):8-14,128.
[11] 王海侠,李行,温铁军.外部力量介入下的农村基层矛盾化解——基于内蒙古GZ村的考察[J].贵州社会科学,2016(1):152-157.
[12] 彭向刚,刘振军.论我国社会安全治理现代化的推进路径——以矛盾论为分析工具[J].理论探讨,2020(4):145-151.
[13] 陆益龙.快速转型期城市社会易发矛盾纠纷及其化解机制[J].人文杂志,2013(12):101-109.
[14] 马亮.数字政府建设:文献述评与研究展望[J].党政研究,2021(3):99-111.
[15] 郑会霞.新时代社会治理面临的新挑战与应对之策[J].中州学刊,2019(7):68-74.
[16] 司法部.全国70多万个人民调解组织 每年调解矛盾纠纷900多万件[EB/OL].(2021-09-24)[2023-01-05].http://news.cyol.com/gb/articles/2021-09/24/content_veo7Oul5W.html.
[17] 程新斌,王静姝,唐啸.国家能力与非传统安全——基于新冠肺炎疫情的再思考[J].当代世界与社会主义,2020(4):185-192.
[18] 余潇枫,潘临灵.“非常态危机”识别与防控——基于非传统安全的视角[J].探索与争鸣,2020(4):149-159,289-290.
[19] 安慧影,黄朝峰.后疫情时代中国基层社会的整体性治理研究[J].社会科学,2021(8):33-40.
[20] 吴志敏.新媒体视域下城市突发公共事件的风险治理[J].甘肃社会科学,2017(5):208-213.
[21] 王裕根.依法分类治理信访诉求:实践困境、内在张力与优化路径[J].理论导刊,2020(2):84-92.
[22] 王福华.论民事司法成本的分担[J].中国社会科学,2016(2):93-113,206.
[23] 刘正强.重建信访政治——超越国家“访”务困境的一种思路[J].开放时代,2015(1):156-170.
[24] 最高人民检察院.信访总量高位运行[EB/OL].(2021-10-21)[2023-01-08].https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202110/t20211021_533010.shtml.
[25] 张紧跟,周勇振.信访维稳属地管理中基层政府政策执行研究——以A市檀乡为例[J].中国行政管理,2019(1):80-87.
[26] 李祖佩,钟涨宝.分级处理与资源依赖——项目制基层实践中矛盾调处与秩序维持[J].中国农村观察,2015(2):81-93,97.
[27] 肖扬.充分发挥司法调解在构建社会主义和谐社会中的积极作用[J].求是,2006(19):5-8.
[28] 汪世荣.“枫桥经验”视野下的基层社会治理制度供给研究[J].中国法学,2018(6):5-22.
[29] 寇丽平.疫情防控常态化背景下推进社会安全治理现代化[J].中国应急管理科学,2022(1):4-12.
[30] 朱志玲.矛盾遭遇对基层政府评价的影响——以社会公平感、社会安全感为中介变量[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):97-109.
[31] 李宏.公共财政支出的社会安全治理效应:理论逻辑、实证检验与动态分析[J].宁夏社会科学,2019(2):93-100.
[32] 张旭,朱笑延.高质量发展语境下的社会安全治理现代化研究[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2020(Z1):74-80.
[33] 范愉.社会转型中的人民调解制度——以上海市长宁区人民调解组织改革的经验为视点[J].中国司法,2004(10):55-62.
[34] 何永军.乡村社会嬗变与人民调解制度变迁[J].法制与社会发展,2013(1):76-90.
[35] 曹海军,鲍操.系统集成与部门协同:基层社会矛盾纠纷化解的流程再造与治理效能——以浙江省A县“矛调中心”为例[J].天津行政学院学报,2020(6):23-31.
[36] 关婷,薛澜,赵静.技术赋能的治理创新:基于中国环境领域的实践案例[J].中国行政管理,2019(4):58-65.
[37] 欧阳康,赵琦.以人民为中心的国家治理现代化[J].江苏社会科学,2020(1):1-8,253.
[38] 何艳玲.中国行政体制改革的价值显现[J].中国社会科学,2020(2):25-45,204-205.
[39] 吴忠民.以创新的社会管理积极维护社会安全[J].中共中央党校学报,2012(6):71-75.
[40] 王斌通.新时代“枫桥经验”与矛盾纠纷源头治理的法治化[J].行政管理改革,2021(12):67-75.
[41] 中共中央党史和文献研究院.十九大以来重要文献选编(上)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2019.
[42] 田先红.政党如何引领社会?——后单位时代的基层党组织与社会之间关系分析[J].开放时代,2020(2):118-144.
[43] 汪勇,周延东.情感治理:枫桥经验的传统起源与现代应用[J].公安学研究,2018(3):1-23,123.
[44] 孙璐.社区情感治理:逻辑、着力维度与实践进路[J].江淮论坛,2020(6):139-144.
[45] 李丽华,丁姿,肖延辉.社会安全问题研究新视角:大数据视域下的特征、挑战及对策[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):121-127.
[46] 程琥.在线纠纷解决机制与我国矛盾纠纷多元化解机制的衔接[J].法律适用,2016(2):55-62.
[47] 曹海军,王梦.制度、资源与技术:社会矛盾调处化解综合治理之路——以衢州“主”字型矛调模式为例[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2021(3):80-87.
[48] 冯卫国,苟震.基层社会治理中的信息治理:以“枫桥经验”为视角[J].河北法学,2019(11):72-82.
[49] 陈思.算法治理:智能社会技术异化的风险及应对[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(1):158-165.
[50] 中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义社会建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.
[1] YU Gang-qiang, LI Jia-lin. How Is the Institutional Trust of Primary-level Public-private Partnership Established?—A Case Study Based on H Street [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(6): 29-40.
[2] TAN Ying-jun, MENG Xiao-shuang. Towards Overall Intelligent Governance: A New Trend in Improving the Efficiency of Primary-level Governance in Ethnic Regions [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(6): 41-54.
[3] WANG Wei-jin, LU Jie-hua. Interaction between the State and Communities: The Evolutionary Characteristics and Influence of Ancient Rural Governance in China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(6): 146-158.
[4] ZHOU Zhen-chao, HUANG Hong-kai. The Causes and Countermeasures of the Heavy Burden of Primary-level Governments in the Perspective of the Relationship between Strip and Block [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 59-69.
[5] WU Xiao-lin, LI Yi. Spatial Cohesion: The Formation Mechanism of Primary-level Governance Community in the Transformation of Urban Living Space [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(4): 28-39.
[6] WANG Dian-li, SUN Yan. Off-domain Mobility and Emotional Symbiosis: How It Is Possible to Build a Community of Primary-level Social Governance in Urban-rural Integration —An Analysis Based on the Mutually Shaped Relations between Space and Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(3): 11-22.
[7] PENG Bo, DU Li. Building the Spatial Foundation of Social Security: An Analysis of Spatial Production Based on Urban Block Renewal [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 21-35.
[8] RONG Zhi, WU Lei, LI Jie. Digital Transformation of Primary-level Governance Driven by Public Value:Observation Based on the Operation of “Two Networks” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 49-62.
[9] ZHANG Hui-ping, YE Qing-lin. Data Authorization and Business Collaboration: A Breakthrough in the Dilemma of Community-level Governance Empowered by Department Data [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 63-73.
[10] WANG Gang, WU Xiang-nan. Organization Remolding by the Shift of Governance Focus: A Theoretical Summary of Governance Innovation in Urban Primary-level ——A Case Study of the Reform of “Whistle-blowing in Streets and Townships, Reporting of Departments, Joint Responsibility of Leaders” in Chengyang District of Q City [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 54-67.
[11] XU Yong, REN Lu. Construction of Field Politics Guided by Field Experiment ——Review and Reflection on Four Political Experiments Conducted by Central China Normal University [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 143-152.
[12] HUANG Hui-yun, PAN Jin-jing, ZHOU Yong-gen. Liu Shao-qi’s Social Security Thoughts and Practice during the Central Soviet Area Period [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 46-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DONG Hui, DU Xiao-yi. Chinese Modernization: Dialectical Unity of Both Vitality and Order[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 1 -10 .
[2] CHEN Jia-jian, HONG Jun-bao. The Discourse of Social Governance and Its Local Practice: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of “Fuzzy Policy”[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 11 -20 .
[3] ZANG Lei-zhen, ZHANG Bing-qian, LIU Chao. Inclusive Growth: The Condition and Mechanism for Technological Progress to Promote Common Prosperity —Evidences from Global Macro Panel Data[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 21 -31 .
[4] XU Guo-chong, XIA Yu, LIU Yan-song. How Can the Model That “the Weak Collaborates with the Strong” Work Well? —A Case Study Based on the “Procedural-Cognitive” Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 32 -49 .
[5] ZHANG Shu-wei, WANG Yan, QIN Xiao-tong. Long Journey Ahead with Obstacles “yields to” Those Who “act and pursue”: the Way of Behavioral Governance in Public Affairs[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 50 -68 .
[6] LIU Lei, ZHANG Xin-ya. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Dependence on Creativity and Reflection on the Future Development Path of Education[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 83 -91 .
[7] WU Bian, CHEN Si-si. Visual Learning Analysis for Promoting Teaching and Learning in a Smart Education Environment[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 92 -103 .
[8] MA Wei-hong, SU Xun. How to Define the Corporate “Responsibility” from a Social Perspective?[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 104 -116 .
[9] WEI Zheng-wei, GAO Ya-lin, YANG Chuan. The Impact of Business Environment on Enterprise Innovation —A Research Based on Threshold Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 117 -129 .
[10] WU Da-shun. The Text Communication of Yuefu Poetry and the Style Construction of five-character poems in Han and Wei Dynasties[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(1): 130 -141 .