权力的维度:两岸政治话语的现状与未来构建

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.06.009

Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 67-73.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.06.009

Previous Articles Next Articles

The Dimension of Power: An Analysis of the Current Situation of Political Discourse on Both Sides of the Taiwan Straits and Its Future Construction

ZHANG Jin-shan¹, WANG Hui-hui², HU Yan³

1. School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangxi Normal University;
2. School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004;
3. Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005;
School of Marxism,Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Received:2018-05-28 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2019-01-08

Abstract

Abstract: The cross-strait discourse right is the power of factual description and regulate norms of the Taiwan issue by all parties across the Taiwan Strait. This current power is unevenly distributed among the three major political parties in the Mainland and Taiwan, and is accompanied by corresponding conflict, tension, and even confrontational discourse relations. Based on the three dimensions of the power theory, the paper analyzes the power trajectory of cross-strait political discourse from the core variables of preferences, decision-making, and conflict, and then proposes to change the unilateral dominating myth in the cross-strait discourse power. The cooperative discourse power between Taiwan and the mainland is a new path for the harmonious, inclusive, and all-round development of cross-strait relations.

Key words: discourse right, cross-strait relations, decision control, consensus

CLC Number:

D675.8

ZHANG Jin-shan, WANG Hui-hui, HU Yan. The Dimension of Power: An Analysis of the Current Situation of Political Discourse on Both Sides of the Taiwan Straits and Its Future Construction[J].Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 67-73.

References

[1] [美]詹姆斯·保罗·吉.话语分析导论:理论与方法[M].杨炳钧,译. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011.
[2] [法]米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.上海:三联书店出版社,1999 .
[3] 王志珂: 福柯[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1999.
[4] 徐博东,陈星. 论“台独”话语霸权的建构[J].台湾研究,2004(6).
[5] 陈星.试论台湾社会的政治话语重构及影响[J].北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016(4).
[6] 萧师言.“习洪会”再次确认“九二共识” 台媒称两岸话语权被抢[EB/OL]. http://www.taiwan.cn/taiwan/jsxw/201611/t20161102_11611009.htm.2016-11-02.
[7] 刘国深.民进党的世俗化趋向及其困境[J].台湾研究集刊,1992(2).
[8] 民进党发言人罗致政今登陆被视为“破冰之旅” [EB/OL]. http://news.ifeng.com/taiwan/3/detail_2012_03/14/13183110_0.shtml.2012-02-23.
[9] 新华社.习近平在纪念孙中山先生诞辰150周年大会上的讲话[EB/OL]. http://military. cnr.cn/zgjq/gcdt/20161112/t20161112_523260909.htm2016-11-12.
[10] “显性独台”与“隐性独台”正在汇流[EB/OL]. http://taiwan.huanqiu.com/taiwan_opinion/2012-11/3320548.html. 2012-11-28.
[11] [美]加布里埃尔·A. 阿尔蒙德.当代比较政治学[M].杨红伟,方卿,吴新叶,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[12] 谢清果,李淼.传媒视角看马王政争话语权[J].两岸文创志,2014(1).
[13] [美]斯蒂文·卢克斯.权力: 一种激进的观点[M].彭斌,译. 南京:江苏人民出版社, 2008.
[14] 徐炜光.现代中国政治话语的范式转换──以中国共产党为考察对象[D].上海:复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院,2006.
[15] [美] 查尔斯·J.福克斯, 休·T.米勒.后现代公共行政:话语指向[M].楚艳红,译.北京:人民出版社,2013.
[16] 新春话两岸:和平统一的本质与实现途径[J].中国评论,2017(3).
[17] Jorge M. Valdez, Deliberative Democracy , Political Legitimacy , and Self-Democracy in Multicultural Societies[M]. USA West view Press, 2001.
[18] [法]让·皮埃尔·韦尔南.希腊思想的起源[M].秦海鹰,译.北京:三联书店,1996.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10]	. [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .

The Dimension of Power: An Analysis of the Current Situation of Political Discourse on Both Sides of the Taiwan Straits and Its Future Construction

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	TANG Ling, ZHANG Shu-yue. Historical Interpretation of “Monument on Consensus on Using Public Scales” in Sanjie Town of North Guangxi [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(2): 18-24.
[2]	DUAN Yuan-xiu. Rationality, Belief and Agreement: Evaluation and Analysis on Locke’s Consensus Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 28-33.