Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 73-81.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.02.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Technology Empowerment and Bureaucratic Regulation: Political Logic in Technology Governance

WU Xiao-ling   

  1. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2020-02-15 Published:2020-04-20

Abstract: Technology governance refers in particular to the application of information technology in governance. Previous studies, while generalizing its concept, ignored the interaction between technology and bureaucracy. The introduction of technology governance from top to bottom, the case study finds, promoted the standardization and electronization of traditional bureaucratic organizations, formed its features, thus improving the capabilities of bureaucratic organizations. At the same time, technology governance in bureaucracy is more dependent on political logic than pure technology logic. It is an integral part of bureaucracy reform, while it is inevitably regulated and restricted by bureaucracy. In short, technology empowers bureaucracy, bureaucracy regulates technology, and the two bears a “two-way” relationship. Whether the technology governance within the hierarchical system is systematic or not often depends on the will of the superior rather than the executor himself. To judge whether the technology governance is holistic or not, it is necessary to introduce a complete chain of “superior decision makers and specific executors”. If technology governance is driven by the expectation of “short-term administrative procedure improvement”, it is easy to stop at the bureaucratic isomorphism of “involution”.

Key words: technology governance, political logic, bureaucracy

CLC Number: 

  • D630
[1] Mulgan, Geoff J. Communication and control: Networks and the new economies of communication[M]. New York: Guilford;Mueller,1991.
[2] Milton. Ruling the root: Internet governance and the taming of cyberspace[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,2002.
[3] 渠敬东,周飞舟,应星:从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):104-127.
[4] Grembergen W V. Strategies for information technology governance[M]. Igi Global, 2004.
[5] Sambamurthy V, Zmud R W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1999: 261-290.
[6] Saretzki T. Technological governance—technological citizeship?[C] //Heinelt H, Getimis P, Kafkalas G, Smith R, Swyngedouw E. Participatory governance in multi-level context. VS Verlag fürSozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden,2002.
[7] Okot-Uma R W’O, London C S. Electronic governance: re-inventing good governance[J]. Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 2000(5).
[8] AlAwadhi S, Morris A. Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services[J]. Journal of Software, 2009, 4(6): 584-590.
[9] Prins C. Electronic government. Variations on a concept[C]// J E J. Designing e-government. Kluwer Law International, Netherlands, 2001: 1-5.
[10] Stier S. Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2015, 32(3): 270-278.
[11] 张丙宣.政府的技术治理逻辑[J],自然辩证法通讯,2018(5):95-102.
[12] Ahn M J, Bretschneider S. Politics of e-government: E‐government and the political control of bureaucracy[J]. Public Administration Review, 2011, 71(3): 414-424.
[13] Cordelia A. E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form?[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2007,22(3):265-274.
[14] Buffat A. Street-level bureaucracy and e-government[J]. Public Management Review, 2015,17(1):149-161.
[15] 黄晓春,嵇欣.技术治理的极限及其超越[J].社会科学,2016(11):72-79.
[16] 应小丽,钱凌燕.“项目进村”中的技术治理逻辑及困境分析[J].行政论坛,2015(3):93-97.
[17] 付建军.当代中国社会治理创新的发生机制与内在张力——兼论社会治理创新的技术治理逻辑[J].当代世界与社会主义,2018(6):181-190.
[18] 马卫红,耿旭.技术治理对现代国家治理基础的解构[J].探索与争鸣,2019(6):68-75.
[19] 韩志明.技术治理的四重幻象——城市治理中的信息技术及其反思[J].探索与争鸣,2019(6):48-58.
[20] Reddick G. Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2005,22(1): 38-57.
[21] Jain A. Using the lens of Max Weber’s theory of bureaucracy[C]//37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2004: 127-136.
[22] Galperin H. Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: An institutional approach to communication and information policy[J]. The Information Society,2004, 20(3): 159-168.
[23] 简·E.芳汀.构建虚拟政府:信息技术与制度创新[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[24] 马亮.政务服务创新何以降低行政负担:西安行政效能革命的案例研究[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2019(2):4-11.
[25] 蒙克,李朔严.公共管理研究中的案例方法:一个误区和两种传承[J].中国行政管理,2019(9):89-94.
[26] James Mahoney. The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences[J].Sociological Methods & Research,2012(4):570-597.
[27] 周志忍.西方发达国家是否也存在“层层加码”[J].人民论坛,2016(21):25-27.
[28] Kim S, Jooho L. E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government[J]. Public Administration Review,2012,72(6): 819-828.
[29] Moon M J, Welch E W. Same bed, different dreams? A comparative analysis of citizen and bureaucrat perspectives on e-government[J]. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2005, 25(3): 243-264.
[30] La Porte T M, Demchak C C, De Jong M. Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: empirical findings and theoretical speculations[J]. Administration & Society, 2002, 34(4): 411-446.
[31] Parent M, Vandebeek C A, Gemino A C. Building trust through e-government[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2004, 22(4): 720-736
[1] YAN Chang-wu, YANG Zheng-yuan. What is Technology Governance? [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 11-22.
[2] HAN Zhi-ming, LEI Ye-fei. “Change” and “Constant” of Technology Governance——Take the Case of “palm cloud community” in Qixia, Nanjing as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 23-33.
[3] YUAN Fang-cheng, LI Si-hang. The Risk of Technology Governance and Its Evolution Logic——Take Targeted Poverty Alleviation in Rural Areas as the Analysis Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 45-61.
[4] LI Xiang-yu, LIU Qian-wen. An Analysis of the Ma-steel Constitution [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 185-195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Yu-jue. Rethinking Possibility: On Judith Butler’s Radical Democracy Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 34 -39 .
[2] CHEN Li-qin. A Comparison of Qing Ming Festival Legend and Customs in China and Vietnam[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 75 -80 .
[3] CHEN Feng,MENG Zuqiang. Topic Discovery in Microblog Based on BTM and Weighting K-Means[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 37(3): 71 -78 .
[4] HUANG Honghong , QIU Qin,ZHEN Dandan,ZHEN Hanshen,FAN Xiuchun, YU Lifeng. HPLC Fingerprint of Leaf of Sauropus rostratus Miq. from Different Places[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 37(3): 142 -147 .
[5] YUAN Wei-yan. The Construction Effect of the New Land-sea Corridor in Western China:Connotation, Methods and Research Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 63 -73 .
[6] YU Xin-xin,ZHANG Yue,ZHENG Xue. The Influence and Mechanism of Optimism on College Students’ Health[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 83 -90 .
[7] TANG Zheng-dong. The Division of Capital and Labor under the Condition of Private Ownership and Its Irrationality——Young Engels’ Thoughts on Labor-Management Relations and Their Evaluation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 1 -10 .
[8] ZHANG Kan. The Contradictory Characteristics of the Concept of “Capital” in The Grundrisse[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 11 -19 .
[9] GAO Peng-cheng, ZHANG En. The Attribute of Network Interest Expression Media and Its Logical Transformation of Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 20 -29 .
[10] SUN Zhi-jian. Structural Innovation of In-process and After-the-fact Supervision Tools: Review and Prospect of Five-year Practice[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 42 -54 .