Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 110-122.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2022.03.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Scholar-officials’ Cognition-evaluation of Western Learning during the Self-strengthening Movement —From “the Forced Assimilation” to “New Interpretation”

LI Dong   

  1. School of Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
  • Received:2021-07-19 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-01

Abstract: During the Self-strengthening Movement (1860s—1890s), in response to the spread of Western knowledge, scholar-officials of the royal court initially adopted the cognitive psychology of “forced assimilation” to classify the knowledge with the concepts and frames inherent in the Chinese tradition. Their next step, in a deductive way, is to place it under the essence of Confucianism for evaluation. Such “cognition-evaluation psychology” was initially embodied in the theory of “Xi Xue Zhong Yuan” (Chinese knowledge is the root of the Western learning) and that of “Zhong Ben Xi Mo” (Chinese knowledge takes priority). However, with the deepening of their cognition of Western learning, some began to break through that psychology and put forward some additional views that further expanded “Zhong Ben Xi Mo”, such as “Zhong Xi Ge You Ben Mo” (Chinese and Western learning each have their own root), “Zhong Ben Yi Ke Bian” (the root of Chinese learning can be altered) and “Zhong Ben Zhong De Da Ben” (the major part of the root of Chinese learning), which, however, does not run out of the overall framework. Such a phenomenon, according to Macintyre’s theories, is explained by those officials’ failing to realize that the invasion of Western learning, for China, is essentially an “epistemological crisis”, a misinterpretation which renders them to adopt the traditional methods to deal with such crisis, hence the limited significance of such a shift in cognition.

Key words: forced assimilation, reflections of the sacred, Xi Xue Zhong Yuan, Zhong Ben Xi Mo, epistemological crisis, the Self-strengthening Movement (1860s—1890s)

CLC Number: 

  • C912.64
[1] 李栋.鸦片战争前后英美法知识在中国的输入与影响[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013.
[2] 张述祖.西方心理学家文选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1983.
[3] 萧功秦.儒家文化的困境:近代士大夫与中西文化碰撞[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2006.
[4] 黄涛涛,马腾.近代比较法研究的“格义附会”现象分析[C]//徐昕.司法·近代司法专号.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2012.
[5] “中研院”近代史研究所.海防档·机器局(一)[M].台北:台湾省政务印刷厂,1957.
[6] (清)曾纪泽.出使英法俄日记[M]//钟叔河.走向世界丛书(Ⅴ).长沙:岳麓书社,2008.
[7] (清)王韬. 弢园文录外编[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2002.
[8] (清)薛福成.出使英法义比四国日记[M].张玄浩,张英宇,点校.长沙:岳麓书社,1985.
[9] (清)陈虬.创设议院以通下情[G]//“中研院”近代史研究所.近代中国对西方及列强认识资料汇编(第三辑第二分册).台北:“中研院”近代史研究所,1986.
[10] (清)郑观应.盛世危言——郑观应文献选集.上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[11] (清)汤震.论中学西学[G]//“中研院”近代史研究所.近代中国对西方及列强认识资料汇编(第三辑第二分册).台北:“中研院”近代史研究所,1986.
[12] (清)冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2002.
[13] (清)宝鋆.筹办夷务始末(同治朝)[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[14] (清)李鸿章.吴汝纶.李文忠公全集·奏稿[M].台北:文海出版社,1980.
[15] [美]费正清,刘广京.剑桥中国晚清史(1800-1900):下册[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.
[16] (清)郭嵩焘.郭嵩焘奏稿[M].杨坚,校补.长沙:岳麓书社,1983.
[17] (清)郭嵩焘.伦敦与巴黎日记[M]//钟叔河.走向世界丛书(Ⅳ).长沙:岳麓书社,2008.
[18] 徐素华.薛福成集.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1994.
[19] (清)薛福成.庸庵海外文编[O].清光绪长沙新学书局刻本.
[20] 薛毓良,刘晖桢.钟天纬集[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2018.
[21] (清)朱采.复许竹筼[M]//丁伟志,陈崧.中体西用之间——晚清文化思潮论述.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[22] [美]阿拉斯戴尔·麦金泰尔.谁之正义?何种合理性?[M].万俊人,吴海针,王今一,译.北京:当代中国出版社,1996.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Min-zhen. The Settlement of Tang and the Route of Tang Attacking Jie ——A study Based on the New Clues from Bamboo Slips Collected by Tsinghua University[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 1 -11 .
[2] CHEN Jian-guang. The Myth of “Thucydides Trap”: A Study of the New Model of Sino-US Relations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 31 -38 .
[3] HUI Ming,XU Hai-bo. Some Considerations about the Constructions of National Identity   of Hong Kong and Singapore[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 39 -45 .
[4] SHAO Tian-song. A Research on the Official Document Terms of Chinese Society of
the Song Dynasty Unearthed in Heishui City
[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(4): 1 -10 .
[5] WU Quan-lan. The Popularization of Ideology in the Western Han Dynasty and Its Implications[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(4): 37 -42 .
[6] LIAO Guo-yi, GUO Jian-xin. The Impacts on Indonesia brought by China’s Tang and Song Dynasties from the Perspective of Cultural Relics[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 1 -5 .
[7] LI Xiang-yu, LIU Qian-wen. An Analysis of the Ma-steel Constitution[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 185 -195 .
[8] LIU Feng-juan, LI Gong-sheng. Three Dimensions of Kant’s Philosophy of History[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(1): 31 -43 .
[9] QU Xuan. An Interpretation of A Good Life in the View of Marxist Philosophy[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(2): 37 -43 .
[10] Du Li-na. The May Fourth Movement: Its Historical Evaluation and Time Value[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(5): 33 -41 .