Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 41-47.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Actuality of Adorno’s Moral Philosophy: from the Perspective of Reflection on Modernized Holocaust

Zhou Ai-min   

  1. School of Marxism, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2018-05-16 Published:2019-01-08

Abstract: For the phenomenon of the modernized holocaust, Adorno thinks that it has imposed a new categorical imperative on people. At present the modernized holocaust happens at times, Adorno’s reflection on Auschwitz undoubtedly has contemporary relevance. Different from traditional explanation of modernized holocaust, Adorno thinks that the holocaust is not merely the production of human irrationality or the outcome of disorder of social system which called moral factory. On the contrary, its emergence was accompanied by modernity. Apathy, closely related to the formalization of sense, is regarded as the core principle behind modernity. Therefore, holocaust is not the outcome of irrationality, but “The Banality of Evil” of modern “rational” people. Adorno’s new categorical imperative not only targets people’s behavior in normal society, but also directs at the way people think. The new categorical imperative needs not rational foundation since the possibility of its existence lies in individual’s possession of “ethical additions”.

Key words: Auschwitz, moral factory, apathy, new categorical imperative

CLC Number: 

  • B089.1
[1] Theodor W. Adorno. Negative Dialektik[M]//Adorno, Gesammelte Schriften Bd.6, Frankfurt /Main: Suhrkamp, 1973.
[2] Theodor W. Adorno. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
[3] 涂尔干. 社会分工论[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013.
[4] 鲍曼. 现代性与大屠杀[M]. 南京: 译林出版社, 2002.
[5] Max Horkheimer und Theodor W. Adorno. Dialektik der Aufklärung[M]. Berlin: Fischer Verlag, 2013.
[6] 康德. 纯然理性界限内的宗教[M]//李秋零.康德著作全集(第6卷). 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[7] Michael L. Frazer. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[8] 阿伦特. 伦理的现代困境[M].长春:吉林人民出版社, 2003.
[9] Stanley Milgram. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View[M]. London: Tavisock, 1974.
[10] Theodor W. Adorno. Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben[M]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 2014.
[11] Theodor W. Adorno. Probleme der Moralphilosophie[M]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1996.
[1] Wang Yu-chen. Problems and Reflections on the Study of Marxism Abroad in China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 1-9.
[2] GUO Cai-xia. On Lefevere’s Criticism of the Capitalistic Spatial Contradiction [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(3): 54-63.
[3] LI Xi-xiang. Adorno and Post-Marxism: Historical Echo of Negative Dialectics [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(5): 1-7.
[4] FENG Wang-zhou. Reflections on the Reconstruction of Historical Materialism by Western Left Theorists——Based on the Analysis of Perry Anderson, David Harvey and Anthony Giddens [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(5): 15-21.
[5] SHU Jian-hua. From Welfare Capitalism to Welfare Socialism ——The Theory of the Welfare State in the Perspective of New Marxism [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 25-30.
[6] WANG Yu-jue. Rethinking Possibility: On Judith Butler’s Radical Democracy Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 34-39.
[7] XU Heng-bing. An Analysis on the “Production Paradigm” of Markus’s Historical Materialism [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 28-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .