Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 8-19.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.01.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Centralization of Decision-making Power and Administrative Bureaucracy: Government Organization Reform in the Digital Ara

GAO Xiang   

  1. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Received:2022-08-26 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-03-24

Abstract: The acceleration of the construction of digital government highlights the key role of digital technology in reshaping the form of government governance. Digital transformation has a differentiated impact on the decision-making power of different members of government organizations. Among them, street-level bureaucrats and officials working in institutions with weak digital application development capabilities are more likely to feel the sense of domination brought by the use of digital technology. In digital government, the separation between algorithmic decision-making and rigid implementation of government organizations is the latest manifestation of rational organizations in the digital era. In general, the construction of digital government is pushing the separation of decision-making and implementation within the government and that of managers and the managed, forming a trend of government organizational structure reform characterized by centralized decision-making power and administrative bureaucracy. This means that the construction of digital government may stir the revival of ideas such as technology governance and technology-based governance, while scholars need to examine the limits of technology governance and its unintended consequences in more detail. The trend of centralization of decision-making power and administrative bureaucracy in the construction of digital government has important implications for understanding government governance in the digital era.

Key words: digital government, decision-making power, bureaucracy, centralization of power, street-level bureaucrats, government organizations, the digital age, technology governance

CLC Number: 

  • D63
[1] Gao Xiang. State-led digital governance in contemporary China[C]// Naito H, Macikenaite V.State Capacity Building in Contemporary China. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020: 29-45.
[2] 黄璜.互联网+、国家治理与公共政策[J].电子政务,2015(7):54-65.
[3] 孙宇.政府信息公开、公共政策议程和参与型治理[J].中国行政管理,2009(2):64-67.
[4] Hartford K. Dear mayor: online vommunications with local governments in hangzhou and nanjing[J]. China Information,2005, 19(2): 217-260.
[5] 中共浙江省委全面深化改革委员会.中共浙江省委全面深化改革委员会:关于印发《浙江省数字化改革总体方案》的通知(浙委改发〔2021〕2号)[EB/OL].(2021-03-01)[2022-08-26]. http://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web2745/site/attach/0/6c91fa3b9bcf4ece8b 3ad01c41a3c4aa.pdf.
[6] Gao Xiang. State-society relations in China’s state-led digitalization: progress and prospects[J]. The China Review,2020, 20(3): 1-11.
[7] Meng T, Yang Z. Variety of responsive institutions and quality of responsiveness in cyber China[J]. China Review, 2020, 20(3): 13-42.
[8] 郁建兴,黄飚:“整体智治”:公共治理创新与信息技术革命互动融合[J].人民周刊,2020(12):73-75.
[9] Huang B, Yu J. Leading digital technologies for coproduction: the case of “Visit Once” dministrative service reform in Zhejiang province, China[J]. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2019, 24(3):513-532.
[10] 沈费伟,诸靖文.数据赋能:数字政府治理的运作机理与创新路径[J].政治学研究,2021(1):104-115,158.
[11] 黄璜.数字政府:政策、特征与概念[J].治理研究,2020,36(3):6-15,2.
[12] 孟天广.政府数字化转型的要素、机制与路径——兼论“技术赋能”与“技术赋权”的双向驱动[J].治理研究,2021(1):5-14,2.
[13] 北京大学课题组,黄璜.平台驱动的数字政府:能力、转型与现代化[J].电子政务,2020(7):2-30.
[14] Gao Xiang, Tan Jie. From web to weber: understanding the case of “One-Go at Most” as ICT-Driven government reform in contemporary China[J]. The China Review,2020, 20(3): 71-97.
[15] 谈婕,高翔.数字限权:信息技术在纵向政府间治理中的作用机制研究——基于浙江省企业投资项目审批改革的研究[J].治理研究,2020(6):31-40.
[16] Aghion P, Tirole J. Formal and real authority in organizations[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997,105(1): 1-29.
[17] [英]哈耶克.自由宪章[M].杨玉生,冯兴元,陈茅,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
[18] Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
[19] Alfred Tat-Kei Ho. Reinventing local governments and the E-government initiative[J]. Public Administration Review,2002,62(4): 434-44.
[20] Milakovich M E. Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation[M]. New York: Routledge, 2012.
[21] Dunleavy P. New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005, 16(3): 467-494.
[22] Chen Y C, HU L T, Tseng K C, et al.Cross-boundary e-government systems: determinants of performance[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2019, 36(3): 449-459.
[23] Scholta H, Mertens W, Kowalkiewez M et al.From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: an e-government stage model[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2019, 36(1): 11-26.
[24] Kim S, Andersen K N, Lee J. Platform government in the era of smart technology[J]. Public Administration Review, 2022,82(2):362-368.
[25] Bovens M,Zouridis S. From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: how information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control[J]. Public Administration Review,2002,62(2): 174-184.
[26] Jorna F, Wagenaar P. The “Iron Cage” strengthened? Discretion and digital discipline[J]. Public Administration, 2007, 85(1): 189-214.
[27] Vogl T M, Seidelin C, Ganesh B, et al. Smart technology and the emergence of algorithmic bureaucracy: artificial intelligence in UK local authorities[J]. Public Administration Review, 2020, 80(6):13286.
[28] Barth T J, Arnold E. Artificial intelligence and administrative discretion: implications for public administration[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 1999, 29(4): 332-351.
[29] Bullock J B. Artificial intelligence, discretion, and bureaucracy[J]. The American Review of Public Administration,2019,49(7): 751-761.
[30] 何艳玲,宋锴业.社会治理的国家逻辑:基于警务改革史的分析[J].社会学研究, 2021 (4): 87-108.
[31] Fusi F, Feeney M K. Electronic monitoring in public organizations: evidence from US local governments[J].Public Management Review, 2018, 20(10): 1465-1489.
[32] Ahn M J, Bretschneider S. Politics of E-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy[J].Public Administration Review, 2011, 71(3): 414-424.
[33] Kayas O G, Hines T, McLean R, et al. Resisting government rendered surveillance in a local authority[J].Public Management Review, 2018, 21(1):1-21.
[34] Zacka B.When the state meets the street: public service and moral agency[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2017.
[1] Yu Wen-xuan, MA Liang, WANG Dian-li, HAN Zhi-ming, XIE Xin-shui, YE Lin, WEN Hong. Discussion on the Application and Regulation of ChatGPT, the New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 28-53.
[2] WANG Gang, WU Xiang-nan. Organization Remolding by the Shift of Governance Focus: A Theoretical Summary of Governance Innovation in Urban Primary-level ——A Case Study of the Reform of “Whistle-blowing in Streets and Townships, Reporting of Departments, Joint Responsibility of Leaders” in Chengyang District of Q City [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 54-67.
[3] ZHANG Hui-ping. Path, Influence and Risk Response of Algorithm Embedded in Government Bureaucracy [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(3): 52-63.
[4] YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94-110.
[5] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.
[6] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.
[7] YAN Chang-wu, YANG Zheng-yuan. What is Technology Governance? [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 11-22.
[8] HAN Zhi-ming, LEI Ye-fei. “Change” and “Constant” of Technology Governance——Take the Case of “palm cloud community” in Qixia, Nanjing as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 23-33.
[9] MA Liang. Civil Servants’ Information Technology Capacity and the Construction of Digital Government: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of Urban China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 34-44.
[10] YUAN Fang-cheng, LI Si-hang. The Risk of Technology Governance and Its Evolution Logic——Take Targeted Poverty Alleviation in Rural Areas as the Analysis Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 45-61.
[11] WU Xiao-ling. Technology Empowerment and Bureaucratic Regulation: Political Logic in Technology Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 73-81.
[12] LI Xiang-yu, LIU Qian-wen. An Analysis of the Ma-steel Constitution [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 185-195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[2] HE Xi-ying. The Study of Contemporary Urban Rights in the Context of Marxist Space Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 31 -36 .
[3] LI Han, SHI Wei-na. The Observation and Exposition of Composing Historical Works on Liu Song Dynasty and Song Annals before and after Shen Yue’s Period[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 84 -89 .
[4] WANG Tian-Gen. The Annotations and Historical Values of Rare Historical Literature in the Era of Big Data ——The Data Processing of the Send Mail Thin in the British Library and Its Reflection of the Profile of the Qing Empire Communication[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 1 -11 .
[5] ZHONG Rui-tian, LI Xu-hua. On the Realistic Value of Marxism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 1 -11 .
[6] GUO Yuan, GUO Tan. An Analysis on the Realization Model of Traditional Filial Piety Culture[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 25 -30 .
[7] XIE Fang. On Wang Chuanshan’s Liberal Economic Thought[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 31 -37 .
[8] YU Su-ping, LIN Chun-yi. The Moral Implication and Practice of Shareable Development[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 38 -42 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 126 -130 .
[10] LIU Tie-qun. Literary Study and Public Views ——Based on the Practice of the New Southwest Drama to Probe into the Possibility and Significance of Literary Study Involved in Reality[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 78 -81 .