Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 33-44.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.06.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on Resilience Governance of Environmental NIMBY Risk

YANG Xue-feng, XIE Ling   

  1. College of Public Administration,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China
  • Received:2020-07-20 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-01

Abstract: As NIMBY serves as an important form of urban risk in urbanization,its governance has been the main content of building a resilient city.This paper,based on the research paradigms,governance measures,mechanisms and models of environmental NIMBY risk,reveals its characteristics of “Chinese style”,including multi-factor effect,multi-level accumulation and multi-form superposition.In terms of genesis,the research shows that NIMBY conflict is not only the response of social vulnerability,but also the process characterization of urban social resilience.In view of such risk characteristics,this paper clarifies the relationship among environmental NIMBY risk,social vulnerability and urban resilience,defines the connotation of resilience governance,expounds its operation mechanism and governance strategies,and in conclusion it initially puts forward the resilience analysis framework of environmental NIMBY risk governance.

Key words: environmental NIMBY risk, environmental governance, risk governance, urban resilience, Urbanization

CLC Number: 

  • D035.5
[1] 王芳.转型加速期中国的环境风险及其社会应对[J].河北学刊,2012(6):117-122.
[2] 何艳玲.“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J].开放时代,2009(12):102-114.
[3] 洪大用.复合型环境治理的中国道路[J].中共中央党校学报,2016(3):67-73.
[4] Ortwin R.White paper on risk governance:towards an integrative approach[R].International Risk Governance Council,2005:13-16.
[5] 张向和,彭绪亚.基于邻避效应的垃圾处理场选址博弈研究[J].统计与决策,2010(20):45-49.
[6] 陈宝胜.公共政策过程中的邻避冲突及其治理[J].学海,2012(5):110-115.
[7] Kuhn R G,Ballard K R.Canadian innovations in siting hazardous waste management facilities[J].Environmental Management,1998(4):533-545.
[8] 王彩波,张磊.试析邻避冲突对政府的挑战——以环境正义为视角的分析[J].社会科学战线,2012(8):160-168.
[9] 王佃利,王庆歌,韩婷.“应得”正义观:分配正义视角下邻避风险的化解思路[J].山东社会科学,2017(3):56-62.
[10] Lobber D J.Why protest public behavioral and attitudinal response to siting a waste disposal facility[J].Policy Studies Journal,1995(3):499-518.
[11] Martin P S.NIMBY:a case study in conflict politics[J].Public Administration Quarterly,1993(4):460-477.
[12] 李小敏,胡象明.邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J].中国行政管理,2015(3):131-135.
[13] 张乐,童星.“邻避”冲突中的社会学习——基于7个PX项目的案例比较[J].学术界,2016(8):35-54+325.
[14] Haggatt C,Toke D.Crossing the great divide-using multi-method analysis to understand opposition to wind Farms[J].Public Administration,2006(1):103-120.
[15] Kraft M E,Clary B B.Citizen participation and the NIMBY syndrome:public response to radioactive waste disposal[J].Political Research Quantity,1991(2).
[16] 汤汇浩.邻避效应:公益性项目的补偿机制与公民参与[J].中国行政管理,2011(7):111-114.
[17] 李永展.邻避设施设置之研究——环境正义观点[J].台湾大学建筑与城乡研究学报,1998(9):33-38.
[18] 赵小燕.邻避冲突参与动机及其治理:基于三种人性假设的视角[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2014(2):36-41.
[19] 辛方坤.基于风险社会放大框架理论的邻避舆情传播[J].情报杂志,2018(3):116-121+181.
[20] 张乐,童星.“邻避”设施决策“环评”与“稳评”的关系辨析及政策衔接[J].思想战线,2015(6):120-125.
[21] 陶鹏,童星.邻避型群体性事件及其治理[J].南京社会科学,2010(8):63-68.
[22] 王伯承.主体分歧的重构:邻避项目社会稳定风险的多元共治[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):40-47.
[23] 谭爽,胡象明.环境污染型邻避冲突管理中的政府职能缺失与对策分析[J].北京社会科学,2014(5):37-42.
[24] 王佃利,王庆歌.风险社会邻避困境的化解:以共识会议实现公民有效参与[J].理论探讨,2015(5):138-143.
[25] 陈宝胜.从“政府强制”走向“多元协作”:邻比冲突治理的模式转换与路径创新[J].公共管理与政策评论,2015(4):26-39.
[26] 杨雪冬.全球化、风险社会与复合治理[J].马克思主义与现实,2004(4):61-77.
[27] Renn O,Klinke A.Risk governance:concept and application to institutional risk management[C]//Better business regulation in a risk society.Springer,2013:17-36.
[28] 张云昊.社会风险的整合治理机制与模型建构[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)2011,(4):121-132+138.
[29] 张文宏.建构城市社会风险的复合治理模式[N].中国社会科学报,2014-02-07.
[30] 王伯承.邻避项目社会稳定风险防控体系的三重建构[J].地方治理研究,2018(3):52-69+80.
[31] 杨雪冬.构建共责共担的风险复合治理机制[N].北京日报,2019-01-28.
[32] 赵方杜,石阳阳.社会韧性与风险治理[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):17-24.
[33] 刘佳燕,沈毓颖.面向风险治理的社区韧性研究[J].城市发展研究,2017(12):88-91.
[34] Holling C S.Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,2003(2):1-23.
[35] Alberti M,Marzluff J,Shulenberger E.Integrating Humans into Ecosystems:Opportunities and Challenges for Urban Ecology[J].Bio Science,2003(4):1169-1179.
[36] Bruneau M,Chang S E,Eguchi R T.A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2004(4):733-752.
[37] Jha A K,Miner T W,Stanton-Geddes Z.Building Urban Resilience:Principle,Tools and Practice [J].World Bank Publications,2013(2).
[38] 韩翀,郭祖源,彭仲仁.国外社区韧性的理论与实践进展[J].国际城市规划,2017(4):60-66.
[39] 向铭铭,顾林生,韩自强.韧性社区建设发展研究综述[J].美与时代(城市版),2016(7):117-118.
[40] Pham Thi Bich Ngoc.Mechanism of social vulnerability to industrial pollution in peri-urban danang city,vietnam[J].International Journal of Environmental Science and Development,2014,5(1):37-44.
[41] 罗伯特·帕特南,孙竞超.社会资本研究50年[J].探索与争鸣,2019(3):40-49,141.
[42] 申佳可,王云才.基于韧性特征的城市规划与设计框架[J].风景园林,2017(3):98-106.
[43] 周庆智.改革与转型:中国基层治理四十年[J].政治学研究,2019(1):43-52,126.
[44] 唐皇凤,王豪.可控的韧性治理:新时代基层治理现代化的模式选择[J].探索与争鸣,2019(12):53-62.
[45] 王瑶.包容性治理:邻避冲突治理优化的新视角[J].成都行政学院学报,2016(5):8-11.
[46] 张飞,张翔,徐建刚.基于多主体包容性的邻避效应全过程风险规避研究[J].现代城市研究,2013(2):17-22.
[47] 王佃利.“空间生产”视角下邻避现象的包容性治理[J].行政论坛,2018(4):85-91.
[48] 毛寿龙,蔡长昆.风险、制度环境与自然灾害治理:基于社会—生态系统(SES)的分析[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015(1):1-10.
[49] 张康之.论风险社会中民主决策的可行性问题[J].中共杭州市委党校学报,2020(3):4-13,2.
[50] 张康之.论时间资源稀缺化对社会治理的挑战[J].行政论坛,2019(3):31-37.
[51] 王思斌.社会韧性与经济韧性的关系及建构[J].探索与争鸣,2016(3):4-8+2.
[1] XIE Deng-bin, DUAN Su-ying, XIE Ting. The Construction of the Reasonable Flowing Operation Mechanism and Practical Regulation of Compulsory Education Teachers in Ethnic Areas——On the Background of New Urbanization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 87-94.
[2] XIE Deng-bin ,SHEN Yi-jia. The Tension of Compulsory Education Teachers’ Rational Flow in Ethnic Areas under the New Urbanization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 98-104.
[3] ZHAO Xia, YE Cun-Jun, MENG Yong-Heng. Research on Urban-Rural Income Gap, Population Mobility and Economic Urbanization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 52-59.
[4] YUE Xue-lian, LI Chang. Analysison the Supply Problem of Public Service for Migrant Population in Western Cities under the New Pattern Urbanization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 196-200.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Yu-chen. Problems and Reflections on the Study of Marxism Abroad in China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 1 -9 .
[2] HE Dong-hang, JIA Xiu-fei. An Analysis of “Political Potential Energy”——An Interview with Professor He Dong-hang[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 10 -18 .
[3] Han Xi-ping. Marxist Theoretical Solutions to the Problems of Rural Development in China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 1 -6 .
[4] ZHANG Ke-jun, FU Zong-ping. Connection between Comprehensive Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization——An Analysis Based on the Duality of Policy Relations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 7 -20 .
[5] XIONG Yi-han. User-friendly Government:How the InternetReshapes the Relationship between the State and the Society[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 21 -32 .
[6] CHEN Ke-lin. The Causes and Resolution of “Fragmentation of Emergency Governance”——An Comparative Analysis Based on Conventional and Emergency Governance Mechanisms[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 45 -58 .
[7] Ran Hao. Ecological Crisis and Ecological Governance: A Comparative Analysis Based on Institutional Differences between China and the West[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 59 -69 .
[8] FENG Chao-rui, ZHANG Ye-qing. Research on Function Optimization Path of National Poverty Alleviation Information ——A Multi-case Analysis Based on Blockchain Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 70 -85 .
[9] WU Jin-jin. Environmental Conflicts and the Institutionalization of Consultative Democracy of Local Governments: An Empirical Study Based on the Number of Inter-Provincial Hearing Documents[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 86 -102 .
[10] JIA Gen-liang. China’s Central and Western Development Strategy and the Dual Circulation Pattern with the Domestic Large-scale Circulation as Its Main Body[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 103 -113 .