Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 109-119.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.01.010
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Guo-chong1, LU Zhi-qing2, PAN Jin-xian1
CLC Number:
[1] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[EB/OL].(2020-11-03)[2022-04-11].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm. [2] 彭文龙.政府绩效评估价值取向的回顾、评析与新时代发展[J].江西社会科学,2019(6):214-220,256. [3] 陈天祥.政府绩效管理研究:回归政治与技术双重理性本义[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011(4):16-25. [4] 林雪霏.扶贫场域内科层组织的制度弹性——基于广西L县扶贫实践的研究[J].公共管理学报,2014(1):27-38,138-139. [5] Hall J N, Ahn J, Greene J C. Values engagement in evaluation: ideas, illustrations, and implications[J].American Journal of Evaluation,2012,33(2):195-207. [6] LaVelle J M, Stephenson C L, Donaldson S I, et al. Findings from an empirical exploration of evaluators’ values[J/OL].American Journal of Evaluation,2022.https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211046537. [7] Skolits G J, Morrow J A, Burr E M. Reconceptualizing evaluator roles[J].American Journal of Evaluation,2009,30(3):275-295. [8] Wang X, Chen Y, Han Z, et al. Evaluation of mobile-based public participation in China's urban planning: case study of the PinStreet platform[J/OL].Cities,2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102993. [9] 张康之,张乾友.领域融合与公共生活的重建[J].中国人民大学学报,2008(3):104-110. [10] 秦攀博.公众参与的多维审思:分化与融合[J].求实,2019(6):15-27,107-108. [11] 王新松.公民参与、政治参与及社会参与:概念辨析与理论解读[J].浙江学刊,2015(1):204-209. [12] Irvin R A, Stansbury J. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?[J].Public Administration Review,2004,64(1):55-65. [13] [美]理查德·C. 博克斯.公民治理:引领21世纪的美国社区[M].孙柏瑛,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005. [14] 张玉磊,朱德米.重大决策社会稳定风险评估中的利益相关者参与:行动逻辑与模式构建[J].上海行政学院学报,2018(5):70-81. [15] 孙斐,叶烽.公众参与政府绩效管理的可持续性:一个系统性文献综述[J].行政论坛,2020(1):79-87. [16] 毛寿龙,陈小华.政府绩效评估中公众参与的限度及超越[J].理论探讨,2011(1):22-26. [17] 郁建兴,任杰.沃尔多《行政国家》及其当代意义[J].公共管理与政策评论,2018(4):15-29. [18] [美]德怀特·沃尔多.行政国家:美国公共行政的政治理论研究[M].颜昌武,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2017. [19] 张颖.走出路径依赖:重构行政国家权力合法性评价机制[J].政治与法律,2016(9):98-107. [20] 孟天广,李锋.政府质量与政治信任:绩效合法性与制度合法性的假说[J].江苏行政学院学报,2017(6):99-108. [21] Fung, Archon. Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future[J].Public Administration Review,2015,75(4):513-522. [22] 王学军,韩志青,蔡丰泽.政府绩效合法性与公共价值创造——第四届政府绩效管理与绩效领导国际学术会议综述[J].中国行政管理,2016(4):157-159. [23] 刘鹏.风险社会与行政国家再造:一个行政学的阐释框架[J].学海,2017(3):69-76. [24] Jones B D, Greenberg S R, Kaufman C, et al. Service delivery rules and the distribution of local government services: three Detroit bureaucracies[J].The Journal of Politics,1978,40(2):332-368. [25] Brudney J L, England R E. Urban policy making and subjective service evaluations: are they compatible?[J].Public Administration Review,1982,42(2):127-135. [26] 陈小华,卢志朋.地方政府绩效评估模式比较研究:一个分析框架[J].经济社会体制比较,2019(2):106-116. [27] 彭勃.从行政逻辑到治理逻辑:城市社会治理的“逆行政化”改革[J].社会科学,2015(5):18-26. [28] Tan H T R, Harvey G. Unpacking the Black Box: a realist evaluation of performance management for social services[J].Public Management Review,2016,18(10):1456-1478. [29] 宋煜萍.权重结构:公众参与政府绩效评估的核心问题——基于学理与实践的双重演绎逻辑[J].理论与改革,2018(2):141-149. [30] Kim S, Lee J. Citizen participation, process, and transparency in local government: an exploratory study[J].Policy Studies Journal,2019,47(4):1026-1047. [31] 孙洪敏.将依法行政纳入政府绩效管理[J].南京社会科学,2015(1):13-21,36. [32] 张紧跟.从行政赋权到法律赋权:参与式治理创新及其调适[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(6):20-29. [33] 李晓燕.地方政府绩效评估中公众参与有效性困境的破解[J].行政论坛,2019(3):18-22. [34] Yan H, Ting Y. The effectiveness of online citizen evaluation of government performance: a study of the perceptions of local bureaucrats in China[J].Public Personnel Management,2018,47(4):419-444. [35] 宋保振.“数字弱势群体”权利及其法治化保障[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2020(6):53-64. [36] 马长山.智慧社会背景下的“第四代人权”及其保障[J].中国法学,2019(5):5-24. [37] 李齐.数字时代的权力生产与政府责任[J].中国行政管理,2019(11):75-81. [38] 张乾友.“被指标治理”模式的生成及其治理逻辑[J].探索与争鸣,2021(2):107-116,179+181. [39] 尚虎平.政府绩效评估中“结果导向”的操作性偏误与矫治[J].政治学研究,2015(3):91-100. [40] 尚虎平,忠格草.我国地方政府绩效观转型研究——一个面向计划生育政策口号的探索[J].公共管理学报,2016(2):23-37,153-154. [41] Falanga R, Ferrão J. The evaluation of citizen participation in policymaking: insights from Portugal[J/OL].Evaluation and Program Planning,2021,84:10895[2022-02-20].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101895. |
[1] | OU-Yang Jing. What is Minimalist Governance? [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 86-95. |
[2] | ZHONG Wei-jun. Resilient Government Crisis Governance: Promoting Meaning Construction in Uncertainty [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 96-106. |
[3] | GAO Xiang. Centralization of Decision-making Power and Administrative Bureaucracy: Government Organization Reform in the Digital Ara [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 8-19. |
[4] | XIANG Yu-qiong, ZHAO Yan-xin. Differentiated Adaptation: A Study on the Implementation Behavior of Primary-level Governments in Complex Situations —An Investigation Based on the Practice of Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 46-58. |
[5] | SHAO Chun-xia, ZHANG Zhao. Infrastructural Power in Primary-level Governance: Institutional Nature and Its Implementation Mechanisms —A Multi-case Study on Urban Management and Law Enforcement [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(6): 14-25. |
[6] | HUANG Juan, TANG Yin-bin. Complex Situations and Multiple Responses: Action Logic of Policy Executors at the Primary Level —Based on the Case of Implementation of Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy in X Town, Sichuan Province [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(6): 55-68. |
[7] | PANG Jin-you. The Achilles’ Heel of Digital Order: The Myth and Dilemma of Contemporary Data Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 11-20. |
[8] | YU Wen-xuan, WEI Wei. Agile Governance of Data: Value Remodeling and Framework Construction [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 37-49. |
[9] | XIE Xin-shui. Content Producers in the Meta-universe: Production Situation and Action Swamp [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 50-61. |
[10] | SUO LI-ming, WANG Xue. Complex Logic, Coupling Change and Governance Transformation of Urban Intelligent Upgrading —Take the Practice of “urban brain” as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 72-85. |
[11] | HAN Yi, LIU Can. Block-chain Empowerment: The Way of Data Security Governance in the Operation of “Internet+Government Service” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 86-99. |
[12] | TAN Hai-bo, GUO Yi-tong. Balance and Adaptability: A Quantitative Research on Digital Economic Policies of Local Governments—An Analytical Perspective Based on “Policy Tool-Policy Preference” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 100-116. |
[13] | WU Xiao-lin, LI Yi. Spatial Cohesion: The Formation Mechanism of Primary-level Governance Community in the Transformation of Urban Living Space [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(4): 28-39. |
[14] | WEN Hong, LIN Bin. Decision-Making Dilemma in Territorial Management of Emergencies: An Investigation Based on Major Infectious Disease Events [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(4): 40-47. |
[15] | GE Tian-ren. Urban Power Structure and Land Interests Redistribution: A Spatial Political Economy of Beijing Urban Renewal Projects in a Rapid Urbanization Era [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(4): 48-58. |
|