Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 74-87.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2022.01.007
Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Xian-hong
CLC Number:
[1] [美]孔飞力.叫魂:1768年中国妖术大恐慌[M].上海:上海三联书店,1999. [2] 魏丕信.18世纪中国的官僚制度与荒政[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2003. [3] 胡润峰.《经济》杂志:新政府70日——SARS怎样改变中国[EB/OL].(2003-06-03)[2021-10-03].https://business.sohu.com/71/84/article209728471.shtml. [4] Weaver R K. The politics of blame avoidance[J]. Journal of Public Policy, 1986, 6(4):371-398. [5] Hood C. The blame game: spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government[M]. Princeton University Press, 2010. [6] Charbonneau E, Bellavance F. Blame avoidance in public reporting[J].Public Performance & Management Review, 2012,35(3):399-421. [7] Howlett M. Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,29:395-403. [8] Weimer D L.The puzzle of private Rulemaking: expertise, flexibility, and blame avoidance in U.S. regulation[R]. Public Administration Review, 2006, 66(4):569-582. [9] Hernán F, Alison E P. Blame avoidance and policy stability in developing democracies: the politics of public security in Buenos Aires[J]. Comparative Politics, 2016, 49(1):23-42. [10] Kang M, Reich M R.Between credit claiming and blame avoidance: The changing politics of priority-setting for Korea’s national health insurance system[J]. Health Policy, 2014,115 (1):9-17. [11] Twight C. From claiming credit to avoiding blame: the evolution of congressional strategy for asbestos management[J]. Journal of Public Policy, 1991,11(2):153-186. [12] Lindbom A. Obfuscating retrenchment: Swedish welfare policy in the 1990s[J]. Journal of Public Policy, 2007 ,27(2):129-150. [13] Hering M. Welfare state restructuring without grand coalitions: the role of informal cooperation in blame avoidance[J]. German Politics, 2008,17 (2):165-183. [14] Vis B, Kersbergen K V. Towards an open functional approach to welfare state change: pressures, ideas, and blame avoidance[J]. Public Administration, 2013,91(4):840-854. [15] [英]保罗·皮尔逊.拆散福利国家——里根、撒切尔和紧缩政治学[M].舒绍福,译.长春:吉林出版社集团有限责任公司,2007. [16] 谷志军.问责政治的逻辑:在问责与避责之间[J].思想战线,2018(6):146-152. [17] 文宏.突发事件管理中地方政府规避责任行为分析及对策[J].政治学研究,2013(6):52-60. [18] 盛明科,陈廷栋.基层官员避责行为:逻辑·危害·治理[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):39-47. [19] 倪星,王锐.权责分立与基层避责:一种理论解释[J].中国社会科学,2018(5):116-135. [20] 邓大才.反向避责:上位转嫁与逐层移责——以地方政府改革创新过程为分析对象[J].理论探讨,2020(2):157-162. [21] 田先红.属地管理与基层避责:一种理论解释——基于理性选择制度主义的分析[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(2):53-62. [22] 张力伟.从共谋应对到“分锅”避责:基层政府行为新动向——基于一项环境治理的案例研究[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2018(6):30-35. [23] 陶鹏,童星.分权、争功与避责:简政放权改革风险的生成及消减[J].中国高校社会科学,2016(2):89-98. [24] 田先红.基层政府卸责行为的逻辑及其治理[J].求索,2021(5):96-101. [25] 李晓飞.行政发包制下的府际联合避责:生成、类型与防治[J].中国行政管理,2019(10):94-100. [26] 金太军,张健荣.“为官不为”现象剖析及其规制[J].学习与探索,2016(3):42-47. [27] 盛智明.地方政府部门如何规避风险?——以A市社区物业管理新政为例[J].社会学研究,2017(5):166-191. [28] 陶鹏.迟滞、分化及泛化:避责政治与风险规制体制形塑[J].云南社会科学,2016(6):89-94. [29] 倪星,王锐.从邀功到避责:基层政府官员行为变化研究[J].政治学研究,2017(2):42-51. [30] 渠敬东,周飞舟,应星.从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):104-127. [31] 王雨磊.数字下乡:农村精准扶贫中的技术治理[J].社会学研究,2016(6):119-142. [32] [德]马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会(下卷)[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997. [33] 黄仁宇.万历十五年[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997. [34] 陈秀惠.历史中国的“数目字管理”[J].社会科学论坛,2005(2):6-10. [35] 荣敬本.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998. [36] [匈]雅诺什·科尔奈.社会主义体制:共产主义经济学[M].张安,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2007. [37] 周黎安.行政发包制[J].社会,2014(6):1-38. [38] Baekkeskov E, Rubin O. Information dilemmas and blame-avoidance strategies: from secrecy to lightning rods in Chinese health crises[J]. Governance, 2017,30(3): 425-443. [39] 俞可平.治理和善治:一种新的政治分析框架[J].南京社会科学,2001(9):40-44. [40] Hood C. What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?[J]. Public Management Review,2007, 9(2): 191-210. [41] 甘肃白银越野赛调查报告全文公布,大量细节首次披露[EB/OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1703704179981528321&wfr=spider&for=pc. [42] 侯麟科,刘明兴,陶郁.双重约束视角下的基层治理结构与效能:经验与反思[J].管理世界,2020(5):145-160. [43] Holmstrom B,Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design[J]. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1991, 7:24- 52. [44] 周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003. [45] Hood C.Risk and government: the architectonics of blame-avoidance[M]// Skinns L, Scott M, Cox Tony. Risk.Cambridge University Press, 2011:73. [46] 广西南丹特大矿难:81人丧生,瞒报官员被判死刑[EB/OL]. (2021-06-22)[2021-10-03].https://new.qq.com/omn/20210622/20210622A098C400.html. [47] 我市出台《安全生产领域举报奖励办法》最高奖10万元[EB/OL]. (2021-06-29)[2021-10-03].https://www.163.com/dy/article/GDLUVKJL05372DDF.html. [48] 田先红.大数据时代地方政府治理:挑战与应对[J].人民论坛,2020(Z1):100-102. [49] 王雨磊,苏杨.中国的脱贫奇迹何以造就?中国扶贫的精准行政模式及其国家治理体制基础[J].管理世界,2020(4):195-208. [50] [德]贝克,邓正来,沈国麟.风险社会与中国——与德国社会学家乌尔里希·贝克的对话[J].社会学研究,2010(5):208-231. |
[1] | XU Jia-liang, ZHANG Yu-jie. “Making Society Work”: The Function, Operation Mechanism and Construction Path of Social Organizations’ Participating in Emergency Management [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 1-8. |
[2] | PENG Bo, DU Li. Building the Spatial Foundation of Social Security: An Analysis of Spatial Production Based on Urban Block Renewal [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 21-35. |
[3] | CHEN Shui-sheng, FU Xin-rui. Reconstruction of Public Space in the People’s City —Taking Shanghai’s “One River, One Creek” Waterfront Space Renewal as an Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 36-48. |
[4] | ZHANG Hui-ping, YE Qing-lin. Data Authorization and Business Collaboration: A Breakthrough in the Dilemma of Community-level Governance Empowered by Department Data [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 63-73. |
[5] | OUYANG Jing, WANG Jun. A Formalistic Approach to “take a clear-cut stand”: A New Manifestation of Primary-level Strategism [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(1): 88-96. |
[6] | ZHUO Yue, LUO Min. How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(6): 10-20. |
[7] | LIU Ya-ping, SU Jiao-ni. From Vagueness to Clarity: the Course of A CPPCC Proposal [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 13-25. |
[8] | SUN Zhi-jian. How Does a Proactive Government Shape the Market? The Object Editing Approach for the Innovation of China’s Food Safety Regulation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 39-53. |
[9] | WANG Gang, WU Xiang-nan. Organization Remolding by the Shift of Governance Focus: A Theoretical Summary of Governance Innovation in Urban Primary-level ——A Case Study of the Reform of “Whistle-blowing in Streets and Townships, Reporting of Departments, Joint Responsibility of Leaders” in Chengyang District of Q City [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 54-67. |
[10] | MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1-12. |
[11] | WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13-21. |
[12] | HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53. |
[13] | HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53. |
[14] | XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54-66. |
[15] | YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67-81. |
|