优化城市营商环境与国际国内双循环相互促进——基于上海与多个国际大都市的比较分析

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.03.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来,上海营商环境各项指标得分呈上升趋势,但与纽约、伦敦等国际一流营商环境城市相比仍存在差距。新发展格局下优化我国营商环境来做大做强国内国际双循环互促发展的市场体系变得尤为重要。研究表明：（1）上海营商环境取得长足进步的是开办企业、获得电力和办理施工许可等,尽管办理施工许可仍是上海的难点;上海进一步优化营商环境的短板有：缴纳税费、获得信贷、保护少数投资者、跨境贸易和办理破产。（2）国际比较发现,上海在登记财产和执行合同上排名较高;纽约和伦敦等在获得信贷及办理破产上具有显著优势;新加坡、东京、首尔和香港在办理施工许可、缴纳税费和保护少数投资者方面营商水平较高;柏林、罗马和巴黎的跨境贸易发展水平高。据此,上海需要在信贷和破产上简化审批流程,完善税收制度,加强知识产权保护,打击商业贿赂,营造良好的政商环境和加强自贸试验区制度创新等方面借鉴国际先进经验和做法,进一步改善营商环境。

关键词: 营商环境, 国际国内双循环, 国际大都市, 国际比较

Abstract: Even with a surge of the scores of various indicators of Shanghai’s business environment in recent years, there lies still a gap compared with the world’s leading business environment cities such as New York and London. Under the new development paradigm, it has become particularly important for optimizing China’s business environment so as to expand and strengthen the market system promoted by domestic and international circulation. Our study shows that ：(1) Shanghai’s great progress lies in starting a business, getting electricity, and dealing with construction permits, even now still a headache, and the shortcomings lie in paying taxes, getting credit, protecting minority investors, trading across borders and resolving insolvency; (2) International comparison shows that ：1) Shanghai ranks higher in registering property and enforcing contracts; 2) New York and London have significant advantages in getting credit and resolving insolvency; 3) Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul and Hong Kong gain advantages in dealing with construction permits, paying taxes and protecting minority investors; 4) Berlin, Rome and Paris stand out in trading across borders. Accordingly, Shanghai should, for a better business environment, learn from the advanced international experience and practices in simplifying the approval process for credit and bankruptcy, refining the taxation system, strengthening intellectual property protection, combating commercial bribery, building a good political and commercial environment, and strengthening the institutional innovation of the free trade pilot zone.

Key words: business environment, international and domestic circulation, international metropolises, international comparison

中图分类号:

F114

沈国兵, 孟彩霞. 优化城市营商环境与国际国内双循环相互促进——基于上海与多个国际大都市的比较分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 57(3): 97-112.

SHEN Guo-bing, MENG Cai-xia. Optimizing Urban Business Environment and International & Domestic Circulation Yield Win-win Results—A Comparative Analysis Based on Shanghai and Several international Metropolises[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(3): 97-112.

参考文献

[1] 潘闻闻. 对标世界银行指标体系改善上海营商环境[J]. 科学发展,2018(4):83-89.
[2] 袁东明. 上海优化营商环境的经验与启示[EB/OL]. (2019-03-20)[2019-03-26].https:// baijiahao.baidu.com/s? id=16285
0055355525807&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[3] 董志强,魏下海,汤灿晴. 制度软环境与经济发展——基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J]. 管理世界,2012(4):9-20.
[4] 林毅夫,李永军. 中小金融机构发展与中小企业融资[J]. 经济研究,2001(1):10-18+53-93.
[5] 田国强,赵旭霞. 金融体系效率与地方政府债务的联动影响——民企融资难融资贵的一个双重分析视角[J]. 经济研究,2019(8):4-20.
[6] 张龙鹏,蒋为,周立群. 行政审批对创业的影响研究——基于企业家才能的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2016(4):57-74.
[7] 李林木,宛江,潘颖. 我国税务营商环境的国际比较与优化对策[J]. 税务研究,2018(4):3-9.
[8] 于文超,梁平汉. 不确定性、营商环境与民营企业经营活力[J]. 中国工业经济,2019(11):136-154.
[9] 倪外. 有为政府、有效市场与营商环境优化研究——以上海为例[J]. 上海经济研究,2019(10):61-68.
[10] Puig G V, Tai S L T. China (Shanghai) pilot free trade zone investor-state dispute settlement: an uncertain experiment[J].Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2017(4):673-711.
[11] 范纯增,于光. 服务贸易国际竞争力发展研究——兼论上海服务贸易国际竞争力发展战略[J]. 国际贸易问题,2005(2):48-53.
[12] Gasova K, Stofkova K.E-government as a quality improvement tool for citizens' services[J]. Procedia Engineering,2017, 192:225-230.
[13] Kim J.Tax reform issues in Korea[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2005(6):973-992.
[14] 陈艳. 韩国税收管理的借鉴与思考[J]. 税务研究,2018(3):70-73.
[15] Miyazaki T, Kitamura Y. Decomposition of redistributive effects of Japanese personal income tax,1984-2009[J]. FinanzArchiv:Public Finance Analysis, 2016(3):334-368.
[16] Bruce A L.Intellectual property: America's competitive advantage in the 21st century[J]. Columbia Journal of World Business,1996(1):6-16.
[17] Tsakalerou M.Intellectual property as a key driver of business performance: the case of Singapore and its implications for innovation in a knowledge-based economy[J]. International Journal of Learning & Intellectual Capital,2018(1):83-92.
[18] Holtzman Y, Wu J, Kirk D D.The business-government-society relationship: a comparison between China and the US[J]. Journal of Management Development, 2011(1):112-125.
[19] Feltenstein A, Plassmann F.The welfare analysis of a free trade zone: intermediate goods and the Asian tigers[J]. The World Economy, 2008(7): 905-924.
[20] 沈国兵. 以提升营商环境为抓手,推动上海内外资高质量发展[EB/OL]. (2019(a)-07-31)[2019-08-05]. https://web.shobserver. com/news/detail?id=166375.
[21] 张娟. 进口博览会视角下上海国际贸易中心建设的内涵和路径[J]. 国际贸易,2019(5):38-46.
[22] 葛玉御. 税收“放管服”改善营商环境的路径研究[J]. 税务研究,2017(11):32-36.
[23] 沈国兵.“十四五”期间上海提升国际营商环境的举措[EB/OL].(2019-07-31)[2019-08-05].http://ex.cssn.cn/jjx_yyjjx/yyjjx_gd/201907/t201907314949028.html.
[24] 吕博,刘社芳. 中小企业融资制度国际比较及启示[J]. 国际贸易问题,2004(4):62-65.
[25] Bolaños L, Gifford J, Kweun J Y.Bankruptcy policy and surface transportation public-private partnerships: a comparative analysis of the U.S. and Europe[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2019(2): 185-195.
[26] Chao C C, Yu E S H, Yu W. Government budget, public-sector wages and capital taxes in a small open economy: a Hong Kong case[J]. China Economic Review, 2009(1):54-64.
[27] Kounetas K, Napolitano O.Modeling the incidence of international trade on Italian regional productive efficiency using a meta-frontier DEA approach[J]. Economic Modelling, 2018, 71:45-58.
[28] Stratling R. Deregulation of network industries: what's next? [J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2001(5):
439-444.
[29] 王立勇. 自由贸易港建设与发展的欧洲经验[J]. 人民论坛• 学术前沿,2019(22):16-22.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed