“贵古贱今”批判的历史进程——从文学鉴赏观念到文学史形态

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2015.05.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 先秦时“贵古贱今”、“贵远贱近”为政治观念,孔子自称“好古”,诸子有“法古”与否之争,都是以“贱今”、“贱近”为对立面的;对“贵古贱今”的批判最终演变为“变法”政策。汉代尊经重儒,“贵古”有了文本形态,“贵古贱今”、“贵远贱近”成为社会观念,并延展到文学领域。桓谭、王充的“贵古贱今”批判,从纠正社会风气出发,批判文学鉴赏中的“贵古贱今”,为当代作家鼓吹;曹丕从张扬当代文学事业出发,批判“贵古贱今”而树“建安七子”为经典;葛洪的“贵古贱今”批判,从文采发展规律出发,宣扬文学的发展观。每个时代的“贵古贱今”批判,必定都推出其当代文学经典,各个时代的文学经典,构成文学史。此时,“贵古”、“贵远”以文学史形态取得合法、合理的地位。随着沈约《宋书·谢灵运传论》、刘勰《文心雕龙·时序》、钟嵘《诗品序》等著述中叙述甚或崇尚前代作品,“详远略近”成为规则。文学鉴赏的“贵古贱今”、“贵远贱近”问题,转化为是否“知文”、“知音”以对作品实事求是的理解的问题,文学发展也进入既继承传统“古之制裁”又开创“今之辞调”二者相辅相成的境地。

关键词: 贵古贱今, 文学鉴赏观念, 文学史形态

Abstract: During the pre-Qin period, there is the political idea “to revere the past and despise the present”Confucius claims “love of the ancient”; the philosophers have the argument of whether “following examples of the ancients”. All these are the opposite side of “despising the present”. The criticism of the idea “to revere the past and despise the present” has ultimately evolved to “political reform” policies. In Han Dynasty, respecting Confucian classics won the day, and “to revere the past” has its text form. “To revere the past and despise the present” has become a social concept and extend to literary field. Heng Tan and Wang Chong’s criticism of “revering the past and despising the present” is to rectify the social morality. They criticized “revering the past and despising the present” in literature appreciation which is advocated by contemporary writers. Cao Pi criticized “revering the past and despising the present” to develop contemporary literary and established “Seven Scholars of Jian’ an” as classics. Ge Hong criticized “revering the past and despising the present” from the perspective of literary development rule to publicize the literature development view. The criticism of “revering the past and despising the present” in each era will undoubtedly bring contemporary literary classics and thus form the history of literary. To “revere the past” has obtained its reasonable and legitimate position in the literary history form. It has become a rule to elaborate the past and outline the present as previous works were narrated or even upheld in Book of Song-Biography of Xie Lingyun by Shen Yue; The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons-Time Sequence by Liu Xie; Shih-Pin Prefaces by Zheng Rong. “Revering the past and despising the present” in literature appreciation has transformed into “understanding the text” and “to become a bosom friend of the writer” in order to grasp the true meaning of the work. Thus, the literary development has entered a phase of not only inherit the “traditional rule” but also create “today’s tune”.

Key words: revering the past and despising the present, literature appreciation concept, literary history form

中图分类号:

I206.2

胡大雷. “贵古贱今”批判的历史进程——从文学鉴赏观念到文学史形态[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2015, 51(5): 115-121.

HU Da-lei. To Revere the Past and Despise the Present: A Critical Historical Progress, from Literature Appreciation Concept to Literary History Form[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 115-121.

参考文献

[1] 鬼谷子[M].北京:中国书店,1985.
[2] 何晏,邢昺.论语注疏[M] //阮元.十三经注疏.上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[3] 孔颖达.礼记正义[M] //阮元.十三经注疏.上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[4] 王充.论衡[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1974.
[5] 任继愈.老子今译[M].北京: 古籍出版社,1956.
[6] 孙诒让.墨子间诂[M].上海:上海书店,1986.
[7] 赵岐,孙奭.孟子注疏[M]//阮元.十三经注疏.上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[8] 高亨.商君书注译[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[9] 司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[10] 陈奇遒.韩非子集释[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1974.
[11] 班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[12] 萧统.文选[M].李善,注.北京:中华书局,1977.影印胡刻本.
[13] 詹锳.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
[14] 赵翼,王树民. 廿二史劄记校证[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[15] 范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[16] 魏征,等.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[17] 高诱.淮南子注[M].上海:上海书店,1986.
[18] 杨明照.抱朴子外篇校笺(下)[M].北京:中华书局,1997.
[19] 陈寿.三国志[M].裴松之,注.北京:中华书局,1982.
[20] 欧阳询.艺文类聚[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1982.
[21] 严可均.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全晋文[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
[22] 沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[23] 曹旭.诗品集注 [M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1994.
[24] 魏收.魏书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[25] 严可均.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全梁文[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
[26] 刘昼.刘子[M].袁孝政,注.北京:中华书局,1985.《丛书集成初编》本.
[27] 葛洪.西京杂记[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[28] 房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[29] 王利器.颜氏家训集解[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.

相关文章 15

[1]	周苇风. 汉乐府《艳歌罗敷行》文体考论[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(5): 96-105.
[2]	齐清仙. 马融《广成颂》之用典及文献价值[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(5): 106-116.
[3]	曲景毅, 王治田. 论《唐诗艳逸品》之版本与文献问题——兼谈其作为晚明商业出版物之特色[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(3): 20-29.
[4]	胡大雷. 文学新动力与建安诗歌兴盛[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(3): 140-146.
[5]	杜海军. 论石刻的文学研究状况与不足[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(3): 147-154.
[6]	力之. 襄阳“文选楼”与“高斋学士”所属辨证——关于一不难知的误说流行千年不止之思考及其他[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 100-110.
[7]	刘锋. 李善注《文选》留存旧注综论[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 111-117.
[8]	丁红旗. 论《文选》读习的兴盛在中唐时期[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 118-127.
[9]	王琼. 奎章阁本六臣《文选·海赋》作者注辨证[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 128-131.
[10]	周春艳. 《九辩》乃“汉人的作品”说驳议——兼论“用汉语词汇史鉴定古籍时代”之适用度问题[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 132-137.
[11]	张文东, 李乃龙. 学术述评之我见——读《〈文选〉研究百年述评》之二[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(6): 138-144.
[12]	于景祥,胡佩杰. 论明代中期文学批评中公正对待六朝骈文的倾向——以杨慎、王文禄为中心[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(4): 72-76.
[13]	孟飞. 从“链体”结构看陆贽骈文的功能突破[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(4): 77-85.
[14]	孙丽娜. 论元稹处理骈散关系的方式[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(4): 86-91.
[15]	丁楹. 文人入幕、干谒之风与南宋四六文的繁盛[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(4): 92-99.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed