核心素养导向下的综合学习:基于研学旅行场域的理想图景

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.03.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综合学习是核心素养导向下的学习方式变革,是我国新课程深化变革的重要支点。综合学习适应了核心素养时代特征、学习机制和学生终身发展的要求,是学科逻辑与心理逻辑、学习空间与学习实践辩证统一的学习取向。研学旅行作为不确定性场域下真实交互的学习实践形式,与综合学习理念高度契合。用隐喻表达以研学旅行为载体的综合学习的理想样态,其形态的解构即学生学习的连续性经验在研学体验“通道”中开放迁移,跨界性知识在研学活动“创造”中主动建构,对话性实践在研学交往“舞蹈”中合作协同,延展性场域在研学拓展“空间”中唤起意义。核心素养导向下的综合学习以研学旅行为载体,可以通过构筑系统化研学体验事件、调控序列化研学活动任务、打造立体化研学交往网络、探索活态化研学拓展场域实现真实发生。

关键词: 核心素养, 综合学习, 研学旅行, 学习隐喻

Abstract: Integrated learning is a learning approach reform oriented towards the cultivation of core literacy. It is an important pivot for furthering the reform of China’s new curriculum. Integrated learning adapts to the era features of core literacy, the mechanisms of literacy learning and the requirements for students’ lifelong development. It is thus a learning orientation that dialectically unifies subject logic and psychological logic, learning space and learning practice. As a form of learning practice under uncertain domains with authentic interactions, study trip is highly consistent with the integrated learning concepts. With metaphors to express the ideal state of integrated learning with study trip as the carrier, its form deconstruction, or students’ continuous learning experiences achieve open migration through the “channel” of trip experiences, active construction of interdisciplinary knowledge through the “creation” of trip activities, cooperative collaboration of dialogic practice through the “dance” of trip interaction, and evocation of significance through expanded learning domains in the “space” of trip expansions. With study trip as the carrier, integrated learning guided by core literacy can achieve authentic occurrence through constructing systematic study trip experience events, regulating serialized study trip activity tasks, building three-dimensional study trip interaction networks, and exploring vitalized study trip expanded domains.

Key words: core literacy, integrated learning, study trip, learning metaphors

中图分类号: G42

许锋华, 刘晓菲. 核心素养导向下的综合学习:基于研学旅行场域的理想图景[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2025, 61(3): 63-73.

XU Feng-hua, LIU Xiao-fei. Core Literacy-oriented Integrative Learning: An Ideal Picture Based on Study Trip[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(3): 63-73.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育课程方案(2022年版)[S]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2022.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部等11部门关于推进中小学生研学旅行的意见[EB/OL].(2016-12-19)[2024-01-02].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-12/19/content_5149947.htm.
[3] Easton E, Gilburm A. The field course effect: gains in cognitive learning in undergraduate biology students following a field course[J]. Journal of Biological Education, 2012, 46(1): 29-35.
[4] Durrant K L, Hartman T P. The integrative learning value of field courses[J]. Journal of Biological Education, 2014, 49(4).385-400.
[5] 陈佑清.教学论新编[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2011.
[6] 王鉴,刘静芳.综合学习:内涵、特点与实施[J].中国教育学刊,2023(2):30-35.
[7] Booth A, Mclean M, Walker M. Self, others and society: a case study of university integrative learning[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2009, 34(8): 929-939.
[8] 天笠茂, 李季湄. 论综合学习与综合学习课程[J]. 教育发展研究, 2001(1): 51-55.
[9] 徐晓东.中小学综合学习课程开发和教学设计[J].电化教育研究,2001(1):65-70,80.
[10] [荷]杰罗姆·范梅里恩伯尔,保罗·基尔希纳. 综合学习设计:四元素十步骤系统方法[M]. 盛群力, 陈丽,王文智,译. 福州:福建教育出版社, 2012.
[11] Soare E. Integrative learning path ways in competence based curriculum[C]// Soare E, Langa C. Education facing contemporary world issues. Future Academy: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2017.
[12] 杨惠雯.“经验”或“认知”:学科逻辑与心理逻辑的统一路径研究[J].外国教育研究,2016(9):3-12.
[13] 钟启泉.课堂研究[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2016.
[14] 陈佑清,胡金玲.核心素养导向的课程与教学改革的特质——基于核心素养特性及其学习机制的理解[J].课程·教材·教法,2022(10):12-19.
[15] [丹]克努兹·伊列雷斯. 我们如何学习:全视角学习理论(第2版)[M]. 孙玫璐, 译.北京:教育科学出版社, 2021.
[16] [美]约翰·杜威. 确定性的寻求:关于知行关系的研究[M]. 傅统先, 译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2019.
[17] [美]乔治·莱考夫,马克·约翰逊.我们赖以生存的隐喻[M]. 何文忠, 译. 杭州:浙江大学出版社, 2015.
[18] André R. Teaching climate leadership: promoting integrative learning in courses on strong sustainability[J]. Journal of Management Education, 2020, 44(6): 766-793.
[19] [美]小威廉·E.多尔. 后现代课程观[M]. 王红宇, 译.北京:教育科学出版社, 2015.
[20] [美]约翰·D.布兰思福特,等.人是如何学习的:大脑、心理、经验及学校[M]. 程可拉, 孙亚玲,王旭卿, 译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.
[21] [美]小威廉姆·E.多尔, 诺尔·高夫.课程愿景[M]. 张文军, 张华,余洁,等译. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2004.
[22] 曾文婕,柳熙.获得·参与·知识创造——论人类学习的三大隐喻[J].教育研究,2013(7):88-97.
[23] 钟启泉. 基于“跨学科素养”的教学设计——以STEAM与“综合学习”为例[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022(1): 3-22.
[24] 石中英.知识转型与教育改革[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2020.
[25] 张良.核心素养的生成:以知识观重建为路径[J].教育研究,2019(9):65-70.
[26] [美]威金斯. 教育性评价[M]. 国家基础教育课程改革“促进教师发展与学生成长的评价研究”项目组, 译. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2005.
[27] [日]佐藤学.静悄悄的革命——创造活动、合作、反思的综合学习新课程[M]. 李季湄, 译. 长春:长春出版社, 2003.
[28] [日]佐藤学.学习的快乐——走向对话[M]. 钟启泉, 译.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[29] [美]爱德华·索杰.第三空间——去往洛杉矶和其他真实和想象地方的旅程[M].陆扬, 等译.上海:上海教育出版社,2005.
[30] Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. A statement on integrative learning[EB/OL].(2004-06-08)[2024-01-02]. http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/ilp/uploads/ilp_statement.pdf.
[31] [美]约翰·杜威.经验与自然[M].傅统先, 译. 北京:商务印书馆,2015.
[32] Gick M L, Holyoak K J. Schema induction and analogical transfer[J]. Cognitive Psychology , 1983,15(1): 1-38.
[33] Huber M T, Hutchings P, Gale R. Integrative learning for liberal education[J] . Peer Review,2005, 7(4):4-7.
[34] 许锋华,胡先锦.人工智能技术赋能个性化学习:意蕴、机制与路径[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(4):68-79.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed