Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 114-128.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.06.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Heterogeneity of Risk Preference of Equity Incentive on Innovation Behavior

BI Qian1, XIANG Gui-fang1, LIU Zhi-yu1, LI Xiao-yan2   

  1. 1. College and Economics and Management,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715;
    2. PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhongtian accounting firm,Chongqing 400700,China
  • Received:2020-05-26 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-01

Abstract: Innovation will become the engine of economic development under the “new normal”.On that account,this paper selects the A-share listed companies (2007-2016) in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges as the research samples;in view of the process and systematicness of innovation behavior,it employs comprehensive indicators to measure innovation behavior,and studies the heterogeneity of equity incentive on innovation behavior based on management risk preference.The results show that 1) the implementation of equity incentive can promote enterprise innovation behavior;2) a higher risk the management prefers to take renders a better innovation behavior;3) the effect of equity incentive is different under different management risk preferences,among which,for risk averse management,the impact is particularly significant.The paper also explores different innovative incentive effects of specific equity incentive scheme design on different management with different risk attitudes from three dimensions namely incentive mode selection,incentive strength design and incentive validity period,so as to provide empirical evidence for the specific design of management incentive scheme for Chinese enterprises in transformation.

Key words: Equity incentive, innovation behavior, risk preference, heterogeneity

CLC Number: 

  • F273.1
[1] 汪锦,孙玉涛,刘凤朝.中国企业技术创新的主体地位研究[J].中国软科学,2012(9):146-153.
[2] Panousi V and D Papanikolaou.Investment,Idiosyncratic Risk and Ownership[J].Journal of Finance,2012,67(3):1113-1148.
[3] Dong Jing,Gou Yan-nan.Corporate governance structure,managerial discretion,and the R&D investment in China[J].International Review of Economics and Finance,2010,19(2):180-188.
[4] 赵登峰,唐杰,陈勇.人力资本、内部股权激励与创新企业长期产出的增长路径[J].南开经济研究,2015 (2):3-23.
[5] Bradley,W Benson and Wallace,N Davidson.Reexamining the Managerial Ownership Effect on Firm Value[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2009 (15):573-586.
[6] 徐海峰.高新技术企业股权激励与创新投入的协同效应研究[J].科学管理研究,2014(4):92-95.
[7] 谭洪涛,袁晓星,杨小娟.股权激励促进了企业创新吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].研究与发展管理,2016 (2):1-11.
[8] 唐清泉,徐欣,曹媛.股权激励、研发投入与企业可持续发展——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2009 (8):77-84.
[9] 杨慧军,杨建君.股权集中度、经理人激励与技术创新选择[J].科研管理,2015,36(4):48-55.
[10] 聂常虹,武香婷.股权激励促进科技成果转化——基于中国科学院研究所案例分析[J].管理评论,2017(4):264-272.
[11] 李永忠.R&D项目风险管理的实证研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2014(6):49-52.
[12] Cucculelli M,Ermini B.Risk attitude,product innovation,and firm growth.Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms[J].Economics Letters,2013,118(2):275-279.
[13] Makri M,Lane P J,Gomez-Mejia L.CEO Incentives,Innovation,and performance in technology-intensive firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(11):1057-1080.
[14] Lin Chen,Lin Ping,Song F M,et al.Managerial incentives,CEO characteristics and corporate innovation in China's private sector[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,2011,39(2):176-190.
[15] 何霞,苏晓华.高管团队背景特征、高管激励与企业R&D投入——来自A股上市高新技术企业的数据分析[J].科技管理研究,2012(6):100-108.
[16] Shen C H,Zhang Hao.CEO risk incentives and firm performance following R&D increase [J].Journal of Banking &Finance,2013,37(4):1176-1194.
[17] Wiseman,R M,Gomez-Mejia,L R.A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,23(1):133-153.
[18] 徐宁,徐向艺.控制权激励双重性与技术创新动态能力——基于高科技上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2012(10):109-121.
[19] 李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010(5):55-67.
[20] 孙菁,周红根,李启佳.股权激励与企业研发投入——基于PSM的实证分析[J].南方经济,2016(4):63-79.
[21] 吕文栋,赵杨.管理层风险特质、董事会治理与科技保险参保意愿[J].科研管理,2016(8):113-122.
[22] Sitkin,S B,Weingart,L R.Determinants of Risky Decision-making Behavior:A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity[J].Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(6):1573.
[23] 唐清泉,甄丽明.管理层风险偏爱、薪酬激励与企业R&D投入——基于我国上市公司的经验研究[J].经济管理,2009(5):56-64.
[24] 陈修德,彭玉莲,卢春源.中国上市公司技术创新与企业价值关系的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011 (1):138-146.
[25] 陈金勇,汤湘希,金成隆.区域、自主创新与企业价值[J].山西财经大学学报,2014(3):11-20.
[26] 李江雁,何文龙,王铁民.企业创新能力对企业价值的影响——基于中国移动互联网上市公司的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2016(4):109-118.
[27] 张铁铸.管理层风险特质、会计选择与盈余质量研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2010(9):108-116.
[1] ZHANG Ke-jun, FU Zong-ping. Connection between Comprehensive Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization——An Analysis Based on the Duality of Policy Relations [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 7-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Yu-chen. Problems and Reflections on the Study of Marxism Abroad in China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 1 -9 .
[2] HE Dong-hang, JIA Xiu-fei. An Analysis of “Political Potential Energy”——An Interview with Professor He Dong-hang[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 10 -18 .
[3] Han Xi-ping. Marxist Theoretical Solutions to the Problems of Rural Development in China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 1 -6 .
[4] ZHANG Ke-jun, FU Zong-ping. Connection between Comprehensive Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization——An Analysis Based on the Duality of Policy Relations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 7 -20 .
[5] XIONG Yi-han. User-friendly Government:How the InternetReshapes the Relationship between the State and the Society[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 21 -32 .
[6] YANG Xue-feng, XIE Ling. A Study on Resilience Governance of Environmental NIMBY Risk[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 33 -44 .
[7] CHEN Ke-lin. The Causes and Resolution of “Fragmentation of Emergency Governance”——An Comparative Analysis Based on Conventional and Emergency Governance Mechanisms[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 45 -58 .
[8] Ran Hao. Ecological Crisis and Ecological Governance: A Comparative Analysis Based on Institutional Differences between China and the West[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 59 -69 .
[9] FENG Chao-rui, ZHANG Ye-qing. Research on Function Optimization Path of National Poverty Alleviation Information ——A Multi-case Analysis Based on Blockchain Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 70 -85 .
[10] WU Jin-jin. Environmental Conflicts and the Institutionalization of Consultative Democracy of Local Governments: An Empirical Study Based on the Number of Inter-Provincial Hearing Documents[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 86 -102 .