Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 105-110.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.03.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

From Language to Discourse: the Shift of Bilingual Education Paradigm in Ethnic Regions of China

YUAN Mei, LIU Yu-jie   

  1. 1.College of Education, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081;
    2.College of Education Science, Kashgar University, Kashgar 844006, China
  • Received:2016-02-15 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2018-07-16

Abstract: Chinese ethnic areas, mostly in the border of our motherland, are marked in the characteristics of “multi-languages, ethnically mixed, small communities” and even “cross-border living”. With the acceleration of the globalizing process and increasing exchanges of foreign culture, bilingual education in minority areas should possess the functions of “stabilizing the people, consolidating the border”, “maintaining cultural security” and “highlighting the discourse community ”. In bilingual education, the subjects of education should form the relationship of “inter-subjectivity”, the content should stress on “inter-culturality” and the practice should emphasis“inter-discursivity. The following three “shifts” should be taken to transform educational paradigm from language to discourse: “language tools” shifts to “language ontology”, “unidirectional inculcating” transfers to “dialogues and exchanges”.

Key words: Marxist standpoint on language, discourse, discourse community, bilingual education

CLC Number: 

  • G750
[1] 袁文彬.马克思主义和语言问题[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2015:6.
[2] G.Brown, G.Yue. Discourse Analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1983:1.
[3] [英]斯图亚特·霍尔.表征:文化表象与意指实践[M]. 徐亮,陆兴华,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:6.
[4] Cutting,J.Analysing the Language of Discourse Communities[M].Oxford:Elsevier Science Ltd.,2000:1.
[5] 顾明远,滕珺. 论全球化背景下的民族理解教育[J]. 教育学报,2015(4):4.
[6] Foucault,M.L’Archeology du Savoir[M].Edition Gallimand,1969:168.
[7] Schiffrin D,Tanen D,Hamilton H.The Handbook of Discourse Analysis[M].Oxford:Black Publishing Ltd.,2001:1.
[8] 埃利亚·萨尔法蒂.话语分析基础知识[M]. 曲辰,译.天津:天津人民出版社,2006:65.
[9] 袁英.话语理论的知识谱系及其在中国的流变与重构[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2003:6.
[10] 曼弗雷德·弗兰克.论福柯的话语概念[M]. 陈永国,译.北京:北京文化艺术出版社,2001:83.
[11] 严明.话语共同体理论建构[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2013:1.
[12] 秦龙.马克思从“共同体”视角看人的发展思想探析[J]. 求实, 2007( 9):11.
[13] 陈明富.马克思“共同体”思想视域下民族主义研究的意义[J]. 江淮论坛,2014(4):21.
[14] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第三卷[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1960:525.
[15] 费孝通.费孝通九十新语[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2006:124.
[16] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:54.
[17] 马克思,恩格斯.德意志意识形态[M].北京:人民出版社,2003:25.
[18] 苏令银.主体间性思想政治教育研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2012:107.
[19] 张天宝.试论理解的教育过程观[EB/OL].http://www.3edu.net/lw/lltt/lw_35878_2.html.
[20] 哈贝马斯.交往与社会进化[M]. 张博树,译.重庆:重庆出版社,1989:146.
[21] 韩红.文化间性话语中语义研究的自我理解[J].外语学刊,2004(1):67.
[22] 刘悦笛.中国人文科学的“自创性”: 以文化间性以柔克刚[J].文艺理论研究,2015(1):57.
[23] 中华民族多元一体格局[DB/OL].http://baike.baidu.com/link? url=6mbGCmtn9W6vLQndZFqPcuUolsIE 4xqjnIp0t8lHm AHRPxK64cxQBuLGeu4Jzq0R9QqKFvrCW24maC7eChwuSa.
[24] 张海洋.中国的多元文化与中国人的认同[M].北京:民族出版社,2006:12.
[25] 斯大林.马克思主义与语言问题[M].北京:人民出版社,1951:20
[26] 董爱智,宋德文.话语间性及其话语治疗[J]. 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学),2007(1):63.
[27] 钱冠连.语言:人类存在的家园[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:4.
[28] Volosinov,v.n.Marxism and the Philosophy of Language[M].Harvard University press,1986:9.
[29] 库玛.全球化社会中的语言教师教育[M]. 赵杨,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014:3.
[30] 赵世举.语言与国家[M].北京:商务印书馆,党建读物出版社,2015:219.
[31] 韩昌黎.韩昌黎全集[M].北京:中国书店出版社,1991:536.
[32] 陈桂生. 教育原理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1993:266.
[33] 潘文国.语言学是人学[J]. 白城师范学院学报,2006(1):2.
[34] 苏令银.主体间性[M].上海:上海三联书店,2012:227.
[1] HE Dong-hang, JIA Xiu-fei. An Analysis of “Political Potential Energy”——An Interview with Professor He Dong-hang [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(4): 10-18.
[2] Wu Quan-lan. Enlightenment from the Failure of the Legalists in Struggling for Ideological Discourse in the Western Han Dynasty [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(4): 42-48.
[3] ZHANG Jin-shan, WANG Hui-hui, HU Yan. The Dimension of Power: An Analysis of the Current Situation of Political Discourse on Both Sides of the Taiwan Straits and Its Future Construction [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 67-73.
[4] YANG Li-ping. Protecting Cultural Roots: Cultural Consciousness and the Conversion of the Zhuang-Han Bilingual Education Model [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(6): 81-86.
[5] WANG Yun. Major Values of the National Governance of Traditional Chinese Cultural Resources [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 50-55.
[6] LIU Tie-qun. Literary Study and Public Views ——Based on the Practice of the New Southwest Drama to Probe into the Possibility and Significance of Literary Study Involved in Reality [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 78-81.
[7] DENG Bo-jun. On Corpus Construction of Discourse of Localization of Marxism in China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(4): 1-8.
[8] WU Dai-hong, FAN Ya-gang. An Interpretation of Dong’s Kuant Ci from the Perspective of Formulaic Transmission [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(4): 61-66.
[9] ZHANG Jin-shan. Evolution and Distinction: Cross-Strait “Reunification” Discourse Study and Comparison [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 57-62.
[10] WU Yu. The Pragmatic Identities and Discourse Construction of English Teachers in Online Courses [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 165-171.
[11] WU Quan-lan. The Fight for Ideological Discourse Conducted by the Legalists of the Western Han Dynasty and the Causes of Their Failure [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .