广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 95-102.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.01.010

• 教育科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会排斥危机对儿童欺骗行为的影响:归属需要的调节作用

张珊珊, 张野, 陈萌萌   

  1. 沈阳师范大学教育科学学院, 辽宁沈阳110034
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-20 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-03-26
  • 作者简介:张珊珊(1982-),女,沈阳师范大学讲师,硕士生导师,哲学博士,研究方向:发展心理学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“欺凌治理视域下中小学校园排斥预防与干预体系建构的实证研究”(BHA180128)

The Impact of Social Exclusion Crisis on Children’s Deception: the Moderating Role of Belonging Needs

ZHANG Shan-shan, ZHANG Ye, CHEN Meng-meng   

  1. College of Education Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China
  • Received:2019-10-20 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-03-26

摘要: 考察社会排斥危机对儿童欺骗行为的影响以及归属需要的调节作用。实验一采用偶然排斥任务和问题解决数字矩阵任务,考察社会排斥危机对儿童欺骗行为的影响;实验二采用归属需要问卷筛选高水平、低水平归属需要的被试,进一步考察归属需要高水平在社会排斥危机影响儿童欺骗行为中的调节作用。实验一发现,社会排斥危机组的欺骗行为显著高于社会排斥组和控制组。实验二发现,在高社会排斥危机下,儿童利团体欺骗行为显著高于儿童利个人欺骗行为,高归属需要组的利团体欺骗行为显著多于低归属需要组。社会排斥危机导致儿童欺骗行为,且归属需要可以调节社会排斥威胁对欺骗行为的影响。

关键词: 校园欺凌, 社会排斥危机, 利团体欺骗行为, 利个人欺骗行为, 归属需要

Abstract: This paper is designed to explore the influence of social exclusion crisis on, children’s deceptive behavior, and the regulatory role of belonging needs. The first task is finished in Experiment One, by employing the random exclusion task and problem-solving digital matrix task; the second one is carried on in Experiment Two by adopting attribution needs questionnaire to select the high-level and low-level subjects. The cheating behavior of the Social Exclusion Crisis Group, the former tells, was significantly higher than that of the Social Exclusion Group and the Control Group. Children’s group deception, in the high social exclusion crisis, the latter finds, was significantly higher than children’s individual deception, and the group deception in the high needs group was significantly higher than that in the low needs group. The crisis of social exclusion leads to children’s deception, and the need of belonging can adjust the influence of social exclusion threat on such negative behavior.

Key words: campus bullying, risk of social exclusion, pro-group deceptive behavior, pro-self deceptive behavior, belonging needs

中图分类号: 

  • G47
[1] 杜建政, 夏冰丽. 心理学视野中的社会排斥[J]. 心理科学进展. 2008, 16(6): 981-986.
[2] 李沛沛, 黄程, 寇彧. 社会排斥与个体助人意愿:归属感需求的调节作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(4): 597-602.
[3] Ruggieri, S, Bendixen, M, Gabriel, U, et al. Cyberball: The impact of ostracism on the well-being of early adolescents[J]. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2013, 72(2): 103-109.
[4] Waldeck, D, Tyndall I, Riva P, et al. How do we cope with ostracism?psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between everyday ostracism experiences and psychological distress[J]. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2017, 6(4): 425-432.
[5] Thau, S, Derflerrozin, R, Pitesa, M, et al. Unethical for the sake of the group: risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(1): 98-113.
[6] Allen, N B, Badcock, P B T. The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(6): 887-913.
[7] Molden, D C, Lucas, G M, Gardner, W L, et al. Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion:Being rejected versus being ignored[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96(2): 415-431.
[8] Umphress, E E, Bigham, J B, Mitchell, M S, et al. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Journal of Applied of Psychology, 2010, 95(4): 769-780.
[9] Richman, L S, Leary, M R. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: amultimotive model[J]. Psychological Review, 2009, 116(2): 365-383.
[10] Williams, K D. Ostracism[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58(1): 425-452.
[11] Abrams, D, Rutland, A, Pelletier, J, et al. Children’s group norms: understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups[J]. Child Development,2011, 80 (1): 224-243.
[12] Sandstrom, M J, Deutz, M H F, Lansu, T A M, et al. Unanimous versus partial rejection: how the number of excluders influences the impact of ostracism in children[J]. Aggressive Behavior, 2017, 43(2):190-203.
[13] Reijntjes, A, Kamphui, J H, Prinzie, P, et al. Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies[J]. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2010, 34(4): 244-252.
[14] Treviño, L K, den Nieuwenboer, N A, Kish-Gephart, J J. (Un)Ethical behavior in organizations[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2014,65(1): 635-660.
[15] Koenig, A L, Cicchetti, D, Rogosch, F A. Moral development: the association between maltreatment and young children’s prosocial behaviors and moral transgressions[J]. Social Development, 2010, 3(1): 87-106.
[16 ] 陈静欣, 苏彦捷. 儿童欺骗行为的发展[J]. 教育探索, 2005(10): 89-90.
[17] Williams, S M, Kirmayer, M, Simon, T, et al. Children’s antisocial and prosocial lies to familiar and unfamiliar adults[J]. Infant & Child Development, 2013, 22 (4): 430-438.
[18] Wilson, A E, Smith, M D, Ross, H S. The nature and effects of young children’s lies[J]. Social Development, 2003, 12(1): 21-45.
[19] Talwar, V, Lee, K. The emergence of white-lie telling in children between 3 and 7 years[J]. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2002, 48(2): 160-181.
[20] Kish-Gephart, J J, Harrison, D A, Treviño, L K. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(1): 1-31.
[21] Leary, M, Allen, A B. Belonging motivation: establishing, maintaining, and repairing relational value. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social motivation[M]. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2011, 37-56.
[22] Dewall, C N, Twenge, J M, Gitter, S A, et al. It is the thought that counts: the role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96(1): 45-59.
[23] Maryam, K, Justin, W. Excluded and behaving unethically: social Exclusion, physiological responses, and unethical behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(2): 547-556.
[24] Richman, L S Leary, M R. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: a multimotive model[J]. Psychological Review, 2009, 116(2): 365-383.
[25] Leary, M R, Herbst, K C, McCrary, F. Finding pleasure in solitary activities: desire for aloneness or disinterest in social contact?[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35(1): 59-68.
[26] Robinson, S L, O’Reilly, J, Wang, W. Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(1): 203-231.
[27] Baumeister, R F, Leary, M R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 117(3): 497-529.
[28] Maner, J K, De Wall, C N, Baumeister R F, et al. Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(1): 42-55.
[1] 吴桂彬,龚剑. 多中心理论视阈下民族地区高校大学生创业基地治理研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 149-152.
[2] 余欣欣,张月,郑雪. 乐观对大学生健康状况的影响及作用机制[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(6): 83-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张乾元, 朱倩倩. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的核心要旨[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[2] 柳谦. “公民”或“大众人”?——古典公民观的现代启示[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(5): 66 -72 .
[3] 许恒兵. 马尔库什历史唯物主义“生产范式”批判论析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 28 -33 .
[4] 李斯颖. 侗台语民族歌谣格律比较研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(5): 9 -17 .
[5] 吴文文. 老子政治哲学思想体系的考察——基于北大汉简《老子·上经》首章的校释[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(6): 16 -26 .
[6] 余欣欣, 杨静, 张月. 信息化时代农村中小学心理健康教育家校合作模式探究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(6): 94 -99 .
[7] 国建文,苏德. 跨文化场景调查研究中的伦理问题及其解决——基于文化敏感性的视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(4): 75 -82 .
[8] 刘仁春, 徐连明. 社会结构紧张之下的网络怨恨及其纾解[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(5): 16 -25 .
[9] 王卫华. 超越资本逻辑的“三条路径”之哲学审视[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(5): 42 -52 .
[10] 张立达,唐诗茹. 弹幕文化自由困境的哲学反思[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(5): 53 -58 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发