中国共产党领导干部选拔制度的百年变迁——基于历史制度主义视角的考察

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.02.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为政之要,惟在得人。中国共产党自成立以来领导人民实现了从“站起来”“富起来”到“强起来”的历史性飞跃,其中的制胜法宝是加强干部队伍建设。领导干部是干部队伍中的关键少数,领导干部选拔是干部制度的关键环节。文章首先基于历史制度主义视角,构建了中国共产党领导干部选拔制度百年变迁的分析框架;进而全景呈现领导干部选拔制度百年变迁的四个历史阶段,从结构逻辑和历史逻辑的双重维度,深度剖析路径依赖和关键节点时期领导干部选拔制度变迁的三种类型,即制度的功能变化、制度的渐进微调和制度的重大变革及其重要特征;最后从民主化、科学化和法制化三个向度,总结了领导干部选拔制度百年变迁的基本经验和趋势性特征;从畅通社会优秀人才进入党政干部队伍渠道、建立健全能上能下的机制和标准以及切实加大从基层锻炼选拔干部力度三个方面,就进一步深化领导干部选拔制度改革的重大问题展开延伸讨论、提出政策建议。

关键词: 中国共产党, 领导干部选拔制度, 历史制度主义, 结构逻辑, 历史逻辑, 干部队伍建设

Abstract: The primary concern to run a state is to gather men of virtue and ability. The same is true to the CPC in having achieved a historic leap from China’s “standing up”, “getting well-off” to “getting strong”, a giant step that attributes to the Party’s strengthening the construction of the cadre team since its founding in 1921. To be more specific, the selection of leading cadres, the key minority of the cadre team, is the key link of the cadre system. This paper, based on the perspective of Historical Institutionalism, 1) constructs an analytical framework of the Centennial changes of the CPC selection system of leading cadres; 2) presents a panoramic view, i.e. the four historical stages that the system has been undergoing; 3) gains insights into, from the dual dimensions of structural logic and historical logic, three types of institutional changes of the selection system in the period of path dependence and key nodes, namely, functional changes, gradual fine adjustment, and significant changes and important characteristics, of the system. The paper, in inclusion, 1) sums up, from the three dimensions of democratization, scientification and legalization, the basic experience and trend of the Centennial changes of the system; 2) carries out extended discussions and puts forward policy suggestions on further deepening the reform of the selection system from the three aspects namely unblocking the channels for social talents to enter the Party and government cadre team, establishing and perfecting the mechanism and standard of being able to be promoted or demoted, and practically making greater efforts to select cadres from grass-roots level.

Key words: the Communist Party of China, changes in the selection system of leading cadres, historical institutionalism, structural logic, historical logic, cadre team building

中图分类号:

D262

张强. 中国共产党领导干部选拔制度的百年变迁——基于历史制度主义视角的考察[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 57(2): 1-16.

Zhang Qiang. The Century-old Changes of the CPC Selection System of Leading Cadres ——An Investigation Based on Historical Institutionalism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(2): 1-16.

参考文献

[1] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:542.
[2] Peter Hall, Rosemary Taylor. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism[J]. Political Studies,1996(XLIV): 936-957.
[3] Paul Cammack. The new institutionalism: predatory rule, institutional persistence, and macro-social change[J]. Economy and Society,1992, 21(4):397-429.
[4] [美]道格拉斯·C. 诺思.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
[5] 何俊志.结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义对政治科学的重构[D].上海:复旦大学,2003.
[6] Paul Pierson. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics[J]. American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(2):252-253.
[7] Arthur, W Brian. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy[M]. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
[8] Paul Pierson. The Path to European Integration, A Historical Institutional Analysis [J]. Comparative Political Studies, 1996, 29(2):123-163.
[9] Paul Pierson. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change, Governance [J].An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 2000, 13(4) :475-499.
[10] Kathleen Thelen, Sven Steinmo. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics[A]. Sven Stionmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1992.
[11] Ellen M Immergut . The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism [J].Polities & society , 1998,26(1): 5-34.
[12] Sven Stionmo. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[13] 田玉麒,薛洪生.制度变迁的运作机制:基于历史制度主义的理论考察[J].黑龙江社会科学,2016(4):46-50.
[14] [美]R. 科斯,A. 阿尔钦,D. 诺思.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].刘守英,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1994.
[15] [美]伊丽莎白·桑德斯,张贤明.历史制度主义:分析框架、三种变体与动力机制[J].学习与探索,2017(1): 42-49+174.
[16] Theda Skocpol. Why I am an Historical Institutionalist [J].Polity, 1995,28(1):103.
[17] 孙应帅.史诗般的辉煌巨变——90年来中国共产党党员数量与结构的变化与发展[N].光明日报,2011-07-05(15).
[18] 张全景.在新的历史时期加强党的建设[J].世界社会主义研究,2020(1): 4-7+93.
[19] 中共中央文件选集:第3册[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1989.
[20] 中共中央文件选集:第5册[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1989.
[21] 中央档案馆.中共中央文件选集(第9册)[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1989.
[22] 中央档案馆.中共中央文件选集(第11册)[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991.
[23] 中共中央组织部,中共中央党史研究室,中央档案馆.中国共产党组织史资料(第8卷)[M].北京:中共党史出版社,2000.
[24] 侯晋雄.领导干部选拔任用的历史经验与现实启示[J].理论探索,2015(3):46-50.
[25] 陈凤楼.中国共产党干部工作史纲[M].北京:党建读物出版社,2003.
[26] 中共中央文献研究室.建国以来重要文献选编(第2册)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,1992.
[27] 中国青年报社.我们的口号是又“红”又“专” [N].人民日报,1957-10-31.
[28] 中共中央文献研究室.建国以来毛泽东文稿(第7册)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,1992.
[29] [法]皮埃尔·罗桑瓦龙.公民的加冕礼——法国普选史[M].吕一民,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005.
[30] 王鹏.中国党政领导干部选拔任用制度变迁研究[D].北京:中共中央党校,2011:78.
[31] 邓小平.邓小平文选(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.
[32] 张向鸿.改革开放以来党政领导干部选拔任用制度的变革与创新[J].中共石家庄市委党校学报,2019(4):17-22.
[33] 李源潮.在解放思想改革创新中不断开创组织工作新局面[J].党建研究,2008(12):4-16.
[34] 择优选人的视野更加开阔——竞争上岗成为干部选拔工作的重要方式[N].光明日报,2012-05-24(14).
[35] 李锐.制度、制度变迁与干部选拔任用制度变迁:一个整合性分析框架[J].云南行政学院学报,2016(2): 88-97.
[36] 刘建军.新型精英与使命政治:共产党执政体系的干部制度基础[J].探索与争鸣,2010(11):32-36.
[37] 唐皇凤.新贤能政治:我国干部选拔制度的民主化与现代化[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2016(4):144-154.
[38] 邓小平.邓小平文选(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1983.
[39] 任建明.领导干部选拔制度模式研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(S1):67-73.
[40] 曾庆捷. 党的十八大以来干部选拔任用制度化的新趋势[J].探索与争鸣,2017(11):89-93.
[41] 邓小平.邓小平文选(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed