广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 32-49.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.01.004

• 治理现代化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“以弱协强”何以成功？——基于“程序—认知”框架的案例研究

徐国冲1, 夏瑜2, 刘岩松3   

  1. 1.厦门大学 公共事务学院,福建 厦门 361005;
    2.清华大学 公共管理学院,北京 100084;
    3.中国人民大学 公共管理学院,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-10 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-02-26
  • 作者简介:徐国冲(1983—),男,厦门大学公共事务学院、厦门大学政府绩效管理研究中心教授,博士生导师,研究方向:政府监管与绩效管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“绩效管理导向下的中国政府成本体系研究”(20&ZD115)

How Can the Model That “the Weak Collaborates with the Strong” Work Well? —A Case Study Based on the “Procedural-Cognitive” Framework

XU Guo-chong1, XIA Yu2, LIU Yan-song3   

  1. 1. School of Public Affairs,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005;
    2. School of Public Policy & Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
    3. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2023-06-10 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-26

PDF (PC)

3

摘要： 新世纪是“新公共管理运动”迈向“合作治理”的时代,然而合作不是自动发生的。在强制型合作背景下,弱势能部门采取哪些策略建立内部合法性,推动强势能部门“真诚合作”,现有文献尚未给予足够重视并深入探究具体的实现策略。因此,整合合作治理研究中相对割裂的政治学和组织管理的两种路径,将程序和认知这两种独立的路径整合为理解内部合法性的两个不同层面,从而构建起弱势能部门建立内部合法性的“程序—认知”分析框架,进而以X市学校体育场地设施对外开放政策的跨部门合作作为典型个案,探讨弱势能部门推动强势能部门合作过程中获取内部合法性的策略。案例研究结果表明,纵向权威、社会需求可以为弱势能部门带来较强的外部合法性,而内部合法性的建设则需经历对话参与、协商谈判和承诺协议等三重程序阶段,同时伴随共享认识、理解信任和内生认同三重认知层面的层层生发才得以实现。在“以弱协强”这一约束性情境中奏效的策略,将在约束条件放松或其他支持性条件下获得更为广阔的施展空间。

关键词: 公共管理, 合作治理, 合法性, 程序—认知, 跨部门合作, 弱势能部门

Abstract: The new century witnesses the “New Public Management Movement” moving towards “cooperative governance”, but cooperation itself does not run automatically. In the context of mandatory cooperation, the strategies adopted by weak sectors to establish internal legitimacy and promote sincere cooperation with strong sectors have not drawn sufficient attention according to current literature, hence a need of an in-depth exploration of the specific implementation. Therefore, the article adopts the relatively fragmented paths of political science and organizational management in collaborative governance research, and integrates the two independent paths of program and cognition into two different levels of understanding internal legitimacy, thus constructing a “program-cognition” analysis framework for weak sectors to establish internal legitimacy; the article further takes the inter-departmental cooperation of school sports facilities’ opening to the public in X city as a typical case, with an aim to explore the strategies adopted by weak sectors to gain internal legitimacy in promoting cooperation with strong sectors. The results indicate that vertical authoritative and social needs can bring strong external legitimacy to weak sectors, while the construction of internal legitimacy requires three stages of procedures: dialogue and participation, negotiation and commitment agreements, accompanied by the development of three cognitive levels of shared understanding, understanding and trust, and internal identification. The strategies that work well in the constraint scenario of “the weak collaborating with the strong” will have a broader scope for implementation under relaxed constraints or other supportive conditions.

Key words: public management, collaborative governance, legitimacy, program cognition, inter-departmental cooperation, weak sectors

中图分类号:  D035

[1] Hofstad H, Torfing J. Collaborative innovation as a tool for environmental, economic and social sustainability in regional governance[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 2016,9(4): 49-70.
[2] Kenis P, Provan K G. The control of public networks[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2006,9(3): 227-247.
[3] 胡颖廉.差序异构:政府职能边界模糊的新解释——以市场监管部门为例[J].新视野,2022(1):81-87.
[4] 刘杰,贺东航.造“势”:新中国成立初期防疫运动中的官僚动员[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):103-112.
[5] O’toole L J, Meier K J. Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching structural networks and managerial networking[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 2004,14(4):469-494.
[6] 马克斯·韦伯. 韦伯作品集(Ⅲ):支配社会学[M]. 康乐,简惠美,译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2004: 19.
[7] Maurer J G. Readings in organizational theory: open system approaches[M]. New York: Random House,1971:7-11.
[8] Dowling J, Pfeffer J. Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior[J]. Pacific Sociological Review,1975, 18(1): 122-136.
[9] Parsons T. Structure and process in modern societies[M]. Glencoe, IL: Free Press,1960:175.
[10] Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):571-610.
[11] 徐岩,范娜娜,陈那波. 合法性承载:对运动式治理及其转变的新解释——以A市18年创卫历程为例[J]. 公共行政评论,2015(2):22-46,179.
[12] Provan K G, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18 (2):229-252.
[13] Human S E, Provan K G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: a comparative study of success and demise[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000,45(2):327-365.
[14] Drori I, Honig B. A process model of internal and external legitimacy[J]. Organization Studies, 2013,34(3):345-376.
[15] 赖先进.论政府跨部门协同治理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015:140.
[16] Kostova T, Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(1):64-81.
[17] Lu J W, Xu D. Growth and survival of international joint ventures: an external-internal legitimacy perspective[J]. Journal of Management, 2006,32(3):426-448.
[18] Provan K G, Fish A, Sydow J. Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks[J]. Journal of Management, 2007,33(3):479-516.
[19] Vangen S, Huxham C. Nurturing collaborative relations: building trust in interorganizational collaboration[J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2003,39(1):5-31.
[20] Buchanan A E. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: moral foundations for international law[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,2004:432.
[21] Tyler T. A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities[C]//Jost J T, Major B. The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2001:416.
[22] 塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华,刘为,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:21.
[23] Klijn E H, Edelenbos J. The influence of democratic legitimacy on outcomes in governance networks[J]. Administration & Society, 2012,45(6): 632.
[24] Klign E H, Koppenjan J. Governance networks in the public sector[M]. New York:Routledge,2015: 215.
[25] Klijn E H, Koppenjan J. Governance network theory: past, present and future[J]. Policy & Politics,2012, 40(4):587-606.
[26] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008, 18(4): 557.
[27] Mosley J E, Wong J. Decision-making in collaborative governance networks: pathways to input and throughput legitimacy[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2021, 31(2): 328-345.
[28] Bryson J M, Crosby B C, Stone M M. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature[J]. Public Administration Review,2006, 66(s1): 44-55.
[29] Emerson K, Nabatchi T. Collaborative governance regimes[M]. Washington, D C:Georgetown University Press,2015: 67.
[30] Provan K G, Kenis P, Human S E. Legitimacy building in organizational networks[C]//Bingham L B, Leary R O. Big ideas in collaborative public management. New York:Routledge,2014:130.
[31] Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P. Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2017, 11(1): 459.
[32] Klijn E H, Edelenbos J. Meta-governance as network management[M]//Sørensen E, Torfing J. Theories of democratic network governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007:199-214.
[33] Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012,22(1):1-29.
[34] Koschmann M A, Kuhn T R, Pfarrer M D. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012,37 (3):332-354.
[35] Johnston E W, Hicksy D, Nanz N, et al. Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011,21(4):699-771.
[36] Ring P S, Van De Ven A H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994,19(1): 90-118.
[37] Tsai Fu-Sheng. Composite diversity, social capital, and group knowledge sharing: a case narration[J]. Knowledge Management Research & Practice,2005,3(4): 218-28.
[38] Page S B, Stone M M, Bryson J M, et al. Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: a framework and challenges of assessment[J]. Public Administration,2015,93(3):715-732.
[39] 王富伟.个案研究的意义和限度——基于知识的增长[J].社会学研究,2012(5):161-183,244-245.
[40] Yin R. Case study research design and methods applied social research methods[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2009, 5(1):108.
[41] 蒋敏娟. 中国政府跨部门协同机制研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2016:47.
[42] 王浦劬,赖先进.中国公共政策扩散的模式与机制分析[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科版),2013(6):14-23.
[43] X市人民政府.历年常住人口[EB/OL].(2019-07-19)[2021-12-20]. http://www.xm.gov.cn/zjxm/xmgk/201907/t20190719_2317331.htm.
[44] 香卉辉. X市人均体育场地面积全省第一 设施单一不均衡[EB/OL].(2014-11-07)[2021-12-20]. https://fj.qq.com/a/20141107/019446.htm.
[45] 杨雪冬.简论中国地方政府创新研究的十个问题[J].公共管理学报,2008(1):16-26,120.
[46] 吕普生.我国制度优势转化为国家治理效能的理论逻辑与有效路径分析[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(3):18-33.
[47] 黄六招,顾丽梅,尚虎平.地方公共服务创新是如何生成的?——以“惠企一码通”项目为例[J].公共行政评论,2019(2):143-162,197.
[1] 张书维, 汪彦, 秦枭童. 道阻且长,“行”者将“治”:公共事务的行为治理之道[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 50-68.
[2] 于文轩, 马亮, 王佃利, 韩志明, 谢新水, 叶林, 文宏. “新一代人工智能技术ChatGPT的应用与规制”笔谈[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2023, 59(2): 28-53.
[3] 李文彬, 陈晓绚. 公共管理实验法运用与反思:以公民满意度为例李文彬,陈晓绚[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 57(5): 79-94.
[4] 潘锦全. 纯洁性建设与政党权威——以中国共产党的建设为中心[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2015, 51(4): 58-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 董慧, 杜晓依. 中国式现代化:活力与秩序的辩证统一[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 陈家建, 洪君宝. 社会治理的话语与地方实践:基于“模糊政策”的概念解释[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 11 -20 .
[3] 臧雷振, 张冰倩, 刘超. 包容性增长:技术进步推动共同富裕的条件机制   ——来自全球宏观面板数据的证据[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 21 -31 .
[4] 张书维, 汪彦, 秦枭童. 道阻且长,“行”者将“治”:公共事务的行为治理之道[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 50 -68 .
[5] 赵聚军, 庞尚尚. 社会安全治理现代化视域下基层矛盾化解机制的类型学考察与路径探赜[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 69 -82 .
[6] 刘蕾, 张新亚. 人工智能依赖对创造力的影响与未来教育发展路径的省思[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 83 -91 .
[7] 吴忭, 陈思思. 智慧教育环境中促进教与学的可视化学习分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 92 -103 .
[8] 马卫红, 苏寻. 企业社会责任的“责任”究竟是什么[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 104 -116 .
[9] 韦政伟, 高亚林, 杨川. 营商环境对企业创新的影响——基于门槛模型的研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 117 -129 .
[10] 吴大顺. 乐府诗的文本传播与汉魏五言诗的体式建构[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2024, 60(1): 130 -141 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发