失序与重构:媒介进化中的隐私自治

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现代公民的隐私保护有着强烈的个人自治传统。历史地看,媒介的发展隐喻地推动了个人本位隐私传统的建立,在实践中从“作为隔离的隐私”向“作为控制的隐私”发展。在新的媒介环境中,算法成为新一代主导要素,社会的技术条件、联结关系、权力样态都因此发生了相应变迁,隐私自治的传统路径因而面临多重掣肘。鉴于当前的媒介境况,应当从打破语义连续性、强化信息处理过程的考察、补充对个人的必要支持入手,应对智能时代的信息秩序,探索更能适配当前媒介条件的隐私自治路径。

关键词: 隐私自治, 媒介环境学, 算法, 深度媒介化, 平台

Abstract: The contemporary framework of public privacy protection upholds a robust tradition of individual autonomy. Throughout history, the evolution of media has metaphorically fostered the establishment of an individual-centered privacy tradition, evolving from “privacy as isolation” to “privacy as control” in practical terms. In the new media ecology, algorithms have emerged as a new generation of dominant factors, leading to corresponding changes in technical conditions, connection relations, and power dynamics within society. Consequently, the traditional approach towards privacy autonomy faces multiple constraints. Considering the current status of media landscape, it is imperative to disrupt semantic continuity by enhancing investigations into information processing and providing necessary support for individuals. This approach will enable us to navigate the information order in this era of intelligence and explore a more suitable path towards privacy autonomy that aligns with present-day media conditions.

Key words: privacy autonomy, media ecology, algorithm, deep mediatization, platform

中图分类号: G206

顾理平, 陈言. 失序与重构:媒介进化中的隐私自治[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2025, 61(3): 146-155.

GU Li-ping, CHEN Yan. Disorder and Reconstruction: Privacy Autonomy in Media Evolution[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(3): 146-155.

参考文献

[1] Cohen J E. What privacy is for[J]. Harv. L. Rev., 2012(126):1904.
[2] Rannenberg K, Royer K, Deuker A. The future of identity in the information society: challenges and opportunities[M].Berlin:Springer,2009.
[3] 喻国明,耿晓梦.“深度媒介化”:媒介业的生态格局、价值重心与核心资源[J].新闻与传播研究,2021,28(12):76-91,127-128.
[4] 黄旦.理解媒介的威力——重识媒介与历史[J].探索与争鸣,2022(1):142-148,180.
[5] Hildebrandt M, de Vries K. Privacy, due process and the computational turn: the philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology[M].New York: Routledge, 2013.
[6] [美]路易斯·D.布兰代斯.隐私权[M].宦盛奎,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[7] Westin A F. Privacy and Freedom[M].New York:Atheneum,1967.
[8] 王利明,丁晓东.论《个人信息保护法》的亮点、特色与适用[J].法学家,2021(6):1-16,191.
[9] 丁晓东.个人信息权利的反思与重塑论个人信息保护的适用前提与法益基础[J].中外法学,2020(2):339-356.
[10] 卢家银.论隐私自治:数据迁移权的起源、挑战与利益平衡[J].新闻与传播研究,2019(8):71-88,127-128.
[11] Cohen J E. Turning privacy inside out[J]. Theoretical inquiries in law, 2019, 20(1): 1-31.
[12] 丁晓东.个人信息私法保护的困境与出路[J].法学研究,2018(6):194-206.
[13] Solove D J. The limitations of privacy rights[J]. Notre Dame Law Review, 2022(98): 975-1036.
[14] 邵成圆.重新想象隐私:信息社会隐私的主体及目的[J].国际新闻界,2019(12):44-57.
[15] 余成峰.数字时代隐私权的社会理论重构[J].中国法学,2023(2):169-188.
[16] [美]约书亚·梅罗维茨.消失的地域:电子媒介对社会行为的影响[M].肖志军,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2022.
[17] 张小龙.微信背后的产品观[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2021.
[18] [美]理查德·赛勒,卡斯·桑斯坦.助推:如何做出有关健康、财富与幸福的最佳决策[M].刘宁,译.北京:中信出版社,2018.
[19] 喻国明.传播学的未来学科建设:核心逻辑与范式再造[J].新闻与写作,2021(9):5-11.
[20] 顾理平.无感监视:智能传播技术对当代私人生活的重构[J].新闻大学,2023(11):77-90,122.
[21] [美]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会的意识形态研究[M].刘继,译.上海:译文出版社,2014.
[ 22] 高富平.个人信息保护:从个人控制到社会控制[J].法学研究,2018(3):84-101.
[23] 陈昌凤,张心蔚.信息个人化、信息偏向与技术性纠偏——新技术时代我们如何获取信息[J].新闻与写作,2017(8):42-45.
[24] 张民安,林泰松.隐私权的功能[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2018.
[25] [英]维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格,肯尼斯·库克耶.大数据时代: 生活、工作与思维的大变革[M].盛杨燕,周涛,译.杭州: 浙江人民出版社,2013.
[26] Nissenbaum H. A contextual approach to privacy online[J]. Dædalus, The Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Science, 2011, 140(4): 32-48.
[27] 范为.大数据时代个人信息保护的路径重构[J].环球法律评论,2016(5):92-115.
[28] Delacroix S, Lawrence N D. Bottom-up data trusts: disturbing the ‘one size fits all’approach to data governance[J]. International data privacy law, 2019, 9(4): 236-252.
[29] 罗昕,张瑾杰.智能化治理的运作机制、风险挑战与实践准则[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(2):39-50.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed