广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 40-50.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.02.004

• 治理现代化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

食品风险领域三大部门法责任的联动机制研究

宋亚辉   

  1. 南京大学法学院,江苏南京210023
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-03-29
  • 作者简介:宋亚辉(1984—),男,南京大学法学院教授,博士生导师,法学博士,研究方向:经济法、公司法。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(010514370123)

A Study on the Linkage Mechanism of Legal Responsibility of Three Branch Laws in Food Ris

SONG Ya-hui   

  1. School of Law, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Published:2021-03-29

PDF (PC)

504

摘要： 受大陆法系部门法理论范式的影响,我国《食品安全法》中的法律责任制度呈现出民法、刑法、行政法彼此分立的体系,实践中也保持三大部门法责任并行不悖的格局。然而,对于兼具积极与消极意义的食品风险而言,部门法责任并行不悖的格局难以维持最佳的责任威慑效果。从风险规制的功能主义视角看,食品安全领域的法治,绝非公私法对立和部门法互不干扰的法治,而是公私法合作与部门法联动的法治,如此才能避免威慑不足或威慑过度的双重风险。未来应从法律责任制度价值目标的统一、构成要件的呼应、责任承担方式的协调、责任实施程序的互动等方面,构建三大部门法责任在食品风险领域的联动机制。

关键词: 食品风险, 风险规制, 责任威慑, 食品安全法, 部门法联动

Abstract: The legal liability system in Food Safety Law of the PRC, influenced by the theoretical paradigm of the branch law of Chinese mainland, presents a pattern in which the civil law, the criminal law and the administrative law are separated from each other, and the legal liability of the three branch laws, in practice keeps the same pattern. Such a pattern, however, as for food risk bearing both positive and negative significance, is difficult to maintain the best deterrent effect of liability. The rule of law in food safety, from the perspective of functionalism of risk regulation, is by no means a rule of law in which public and private laws are opposed, but cooperate, and branch laws do not interfere, but link, with each other, thus avoiding the double risks of insufficient or excessive deterrence. The linkage mechanism of the liability of the three branch laws in the food risk should be built from the following aspects: the unification of the value goal of the legal liability system, the echo of the constituent elements, the coordination of the way to take over the liability, and the interaction of the liability implementation procedures.

Key words: food risk, risk regulation, responsibility deterrence, Food Safety Law of the PRC, branch law linkage

中图分类号: 

  • D922.294
[1] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会行政法室.中华人民共和国食品安全法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015.
[2] 宋亚辉.社会基础变迁与部门法分立格局的现代发展[J].法学家,2021(1):1-14.
[3] U. S. Gen. Accounting Office. Food Safety and Security: Fundamental Changes Needed to Ensure Safe Food[M]. GAO-02-47T, Food Safety and Security,2001.
[4] Timothy M Hammonds. It Is Time to Designate a Single Food Safety Agency[J]. Food & Drug L. J. , 2004,59(3):427-432.
[5] Steven Shavell. Liability for Harm versus Rrgulation of Safety[J]. Journal of Legal studies, 1984,13(2):357-374.
[6] Steven Shavell. The Judgement Proof Problem[J]. International Review of Law and Economics ,1986(6):45-58.
[7] [德]贡塔·托依布纳,顾祝轩.私法的社会学启蒙:对谈当代著名法学家托依布纳[J].高薇,译.交大法学,2013(1):6.
[8] 宋亚辉.风险控制的部门法思路及其超越[J].中国社会科学,2017(10):136-158.
[9] 劳东燕.公共政策与风险社会的刑法[J].中国社会科学,2007(3):126-139.
[10] G T Schwartz. Does Tort Law Deter? [J]. UCLA Law Review, 1994,42:377-444.
[11] Kennth Wolpin. An Economic Analysis of Crime and Punishment in England and Wales 1894-1967[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1978,86(5):815-840.
[12] 李友根.惩罚性赔偿制度的中国模式研究[J].法制与社会发展,2015(6):109-126.
[13] 金福海.惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
[14] Jeremy Bentham. The Rationale of Punishment[M]. Nabu Press, 2010.
[15] [美]理查德·波斯纳.法律的经济分析(第七版)[M].蒋兆康,译.北京:法律出版社,2012.
[16] R Barry Ruback, et al. Perception and Payment of Economic Sanctions: A Survey of Offenders[J]. Fed. Probation, 2006,73(3):26.
[17] 宋亚辉.食品安全标准的私法效力及其矫正[J].清华法学,2017(2):155-175.
[18] 朱广新.惩罚性赔偿制度的演进与适用[J].中国社会科学,2014(3):104-124.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈延斌, 王伟. 传统家礼文献整理、研究的学术史梳理与评析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] 李冰, 陈姝瑾. 《郑氏家仪》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] 朱莉涛. 《茗洲吴氏家典》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] 张乾元, 朱倩倩. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的核心要旨[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] 邓世平. 乡村振兴:习近平对毛泽东农村发展思想的继承与发展[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[6] 李潇. 完善我国人格权立法的再思考[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[7] 赛铮. 论保险公司破产是偏颇性清偿行为撤销之例外[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[8] 温锁林. 汉语中的非量化名词[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[9] 贾君芳, 何洪峰. 终点类介词的发展及其语义多义化[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 81 -88 .
[10] 黄启兵. 中国近代教育主权问题的流变[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 109 -114 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发