广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 45-61.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.05.004

• 治理现代化 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共服务满意度中的“期望失验”:一项调查实验

王思琦, 王永杰   

  1. 西南交通大学 公共管理学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-02 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-29
  • 作者简介:王思琦(1978—),男,西南交通大学副教授,从事实地实验方法与公共服务满意度研究;王永杰(1971—),男,西南交通大学教授,从事社会风险治理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金国家应急管理体系建设研究专项课题“跨地区协同处置重大突发公共卫生事件机制研究”(20VYJ027);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于 IAT 实验方法的政府信任测量与影响机制研究”(17XJC630009);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“基层政府权力清单制度实施路径研究”(17YJAZH025);西南交通大学2020年本科教育教学研究与改革项目“知识、能力、素质三位一体的公共管理专业建设研究”(20201049)

“Expectancy Disconfirmation” in Public Service Satisfaction: A Survey Experiment

WANG Si-qi, WANG Yong-jie   

  1. School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2021-06-02 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-29

PDF (PC)

67

摘要： 期望失验模型提出,公民对公共服务的满意度不仅由服务绩效(质量)直接决定,而且还通过将服务绩效与服务之前已有期望的比较即“失验(disconfirmation)”来间接决定。为了检验期望、绩效以及满意度之间的因果关系,本研究采用调查实验方法,通过一项对交通公共服务的实地调查,将调查样本(n=230)随机分配到4个实验组,分别接受高期望或低期望干预,其次接受高绩效或低绩效干预,最后测量满意度。研究结果基本与模型的假设一致,即公众期望是对公共服务满意度的重要预测因素,直接效应与间接效应都证明了这一点。因此,公共服务满意度的改善,除了提高服务质量以外,还可以通过影响公众对服务的期望来实现。

关键词: 期望失验模型, 公共服务满意度, 政府绩效, 期望管理, 调查实验, 因果推断

Abstract: According to the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model (EDM), citizens' satisfaction with public service is determined not only by the quality of service, but also by the implicit comparison with what is expected before receiving the service, i.e. “disconfirmation”. To test the causal relationship between expectations, performances, and satisfaction, this study, by employing a survey experiment to randomly assign respondents (n = 230) to 4 groups, conducts a field survey of public transport services with respectively high or low expected interventions followed by high or low performance interventions, and finally measures satisfaction. The findings are consistent with the model's hypothesis that the citizens' expectations are important predictors of their satisfaction with public services, proved by both the direct and indirect effects. Therefore, the improvement of public service satisfaction, in addition to improving the quality of service, can be achieved by influencing public expectations.

Key words: Expectancy Disconfirmation Model, public service satisfaction, government performance, management of expectations, survey experiment, causal inference

中图分类号: 

  • D035-0
[1] 马亮. 公共管理实验研究何以可能:一项方法学回顾[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2015(4):13-23.
[2] 李晓倩. 行为公共管理学实验:基于SSCI期刊(1978—2016)相关文献的分析[J]. 公共行政评论, 2018(1):37-61.
[3] 王思琦. 公共管理与政策研究中的实地实验:因果推断与影响评估的视角[J]. 公共行政评论, 2018(1):83-107.
[4] Walker R M, James O, Brewer G A. Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research[J]. Public Management Review, 2017,19:1-14.
[5] Ryzin G G V. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2004, 23(3):433-448.
[6] Ryzin G G V.Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2006, 16(4):599-611.
[7] James O. Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2009, 19(1):107-123.
[8] Morgeson F V. Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: testing and expanding the model[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2013, 23(2):289-305.
[9] Ryzin G G V.An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2013, 32(3):597-614.
[10] Filtenborg A F, Gaardboe F, Sigsgaard-Rasmussen J. Experimental replication: an experimental test of the expectancy disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction[J]. Public Management Review, 2017, 19(9):1235-1250.
[11] Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G A. Reconsidering the expectancy disconfirmation model. Three experimental replications[J]. Public Management Review, 2017,19(9):1272-1292.
[12] 王君,林挺进,吴伟,等. 中国城市公共教育服务满意度调查及分析——基于2010连氏中国城市公共服务质量调查的实证研究[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2011(4):49-53.
[13] 季丹, 郭政, 胡品洁. 公共服务质量第三方评价研究——基于华东地区的试点应用[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(1):41-44.
[14] 王佃利, 宋学增. 公共服务满意度调查实证研究——以济南市市政公用行业的调查为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(6):73-77.
[15] Bouckaert G, Van De Walle S. Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators[J]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2003, 69(3):329-343.
[16] Stipak B. Citizen satisfaction with urban services: potential misuse as a performance indicator[J]. Public Administration Review, 1979, 39(1):46-52.
[17] Anderson R E.Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1973, 10(1):38-44.
[18] Oliver R L. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on post-exposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62(4):480-486.
[19] 张跃先,马钦海,刘汝萍. 期望不一致、顾客情绪和顾客满意的关系研究述评[J]. 管理评论, 2010(4):56-63.
[20] Poister T H, Thomas J C. The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists'satisfaction with state highways[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011, 21(4):601-617.
[21] 张光,庄玉乙. 公民期望与政府职能的改进——基于一项对大学生财政支出认知态度的调查研究[J]. 公共管理学报,2012(3):11-18.
[22] 邹德强, 赵平. 期望不一致对满意影响的函数形式:展望理论的预测[J]. 南开管理评论, 2008(6):79-85.
[23] Anderson C J, Norris P. Critical citizens: global support for democratic governance[J]. The American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(3):748.
[24] Roch C H, Poister T H. Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction :the influence of expectations[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2006, 41(3):292-308.
[25] James O.Managing citizens' expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government[J]. Public Administration, 2011, 89(4):1419-1435.
[26] James O, Moseley A.Does performance information about public services affect citizens' perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information[J]. Public Administration, 2014, 92(2):493-511.
[27] Petrovsky N, Mok J Y, León-Cázares F. Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: a test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model[J]. Public Administration Review, 2017, 77(3):395-407.
[28] Gerber A S, Green D P. Field experiments: design, analysis, and interpretation[M]. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012.
[29] Boulding W, Kalra A, Staelin R,et al. A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1993, 30(1):7-27.
[30] Van De Walle S. Explaining citizen satisfaction and dissatisfaction with public services[M]// The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
[31] Charbonneau Étienne, Van Ryzin G G. Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: findings from a survey experiment[J]. Public Management Review, 2015, 17(2):288-304.
[32] James O, Jilke S, Van Ryzin G. Experiments in public management research: challenges and contributions[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
[33] Morgeson F V, Petrescu C.Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies[J]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2011, 77(3):451-479.
[34] Ryzin G G V, Muzzio D, Immerwahr S, et al. Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: an application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City[J]. Public Administration Review, 2004, 64(3):331-341.
[1] 李文彬, 陈晓绚. 公共管理实验法运用与反思:以公民满意度为例李文彬,陈晓绚[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 57(5): 79-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 温锁林. 汉语中的非量化名词[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[2] 吴全兰. 西汉意识形态的大众化及其启示[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(4): 37 -42 .
[3] 席云舒. 东西之辩还是古今之变？——对胡适“全盘西化”思想的再评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(4): 13 -20 .
[4] 陈世民,余祖伟,高良. 个人成长概念、影响因素及其功能[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(4): 83 -91 .
[5] 武永江, 段少帅. 新时代导师语言艺术的育人功能及其培育策略[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(5): 88 -95 .
[6] 齐清仙. 马融《广成颂》之用典及文献价值[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(5): 106 -116 .
[7] 柯建飞. 区块链在金融中的实践与思考[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(1): 65 -75 .
[8] 李文钊. 行动者中心制度主义:探究政策过程中的互动效应[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(3): 19 -42 .
[9] 陈淳. 科学方法、文明探源与夏代信史之争[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(3): 128 -140 .
[10] 张克俊, 付宗平, 李雪. 全面脱贫与乡村振兴的有效衔接——基于政策关系二重性的分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(6): 7 -20 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发