广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 112-120.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.02.016

• 教育/心理研究 • 上一篇    

教师实践知识生成的行动-反思路径

杨鑫   

  1. 西北少数民族教育发展研究中心,甘肃兰州730070
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-16 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-07-13
  • 作者简介:杨鑫(1983-),女 ,西北师范大学副教授,哲学博士,研究方向:教师教育、课程与教学论。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2016年度教育学青年项目(CMA160165);甘肃省社科规划项目(YB041);西北师范大学2016年度青年教师科研提升计划项目(SKGG16005)

Action-Reflection Path of the Generation Mechanism of Teacher’s Practical Knowledge

YANG Xin   

  1. Northwest Minority Education Development Research Center, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2017-10-16 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-07-13

摘要: 教师实践知识生成的行动-反思路径包含行动中反思、对行动的反思和为了行动的反思三个层次,是教师实践知识生成的内在必然要求。首先,行动-反思有助于教师学习如何教学,是教师实践知识生成的前提条件;其次,行动-反思有助于积累教学经验,是教师实践知识生成的主要来源;最后,行动-反思是促使教师实践知识内涵层次之间不断完善的主要动力,即有助于实现从为了实践的知识、实践中的知识到以实践为目的的知识之间的顺利转换。基于不同层次的行动-反思,教师的实践知识得以生成。

关键词: 教师实践知识, 行动-反思, 知识生成

Abstract: The action-reflection path of the generation of teacher’s practical knowledge, which is the inherent requirement for the generation of teacher practical knowledge, involves three dimensions: reflection-on-action, reflection-in-action and reflection-of-action. Firstly, action- reflection is the prerequisite of the generation of teacher’s practical knowledge which helps teachers learn how to teach. Secondly, action-reflection is the major source of teacher’s practical knowledge which helps teacher to accumulate teaching experiences. Finally, action-reflection is the major driving force of promoting the transformation among three dimensions of teacher’s practical knowledge, in other words, it helps to smoothly transform knowledge-for-practice, knowledge-in-practice to knowledge-of-practice. Through action-reflection at various levels, teacher’s practical knowledge is finally formed.

Key words: teacher’s practical knowledge, action-reflection, knowledge generation

中图分类号: 

  • G451
[1] Killion, J, Todnem, G. A process for personal theory building [J]. Education Leadership, 1991, 48(6): 14-16.
[2] Deway, J. How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process [M]. Boston: Heath, 1933.
[3] Schön, D A. The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
[4] Schön, D A. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
[5] Dewey, J. How we think [M]. Boston: D.C.Heath, 1910.
[6] Deway, J. Experience and education [M]. New York: MacMillan, 1929.
[7] Griffiths, M., & Tann, S. Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories [J]. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1992, 18(1): 69-84.
[8] Elbaz, F. Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge [M]. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
[9] Gerber, R. Practical knowledge in workplace learning [A]. In G. Castleton (Ed.), Improving Workplace Learning [M]. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2006.
[10] Gholami, K, & Husu, J. How do teachers reason about their practice? representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 2010, 26(8): 1520-1529.
[11] Duffee, L, & Aikenhead, G. Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge [J]. Science education, 1992, 76(5): 493-506.
[12] Tsang, W. K. Teachers’ Personal Practical Knowledge and Interactive Decisions [J]. Language Teaching Research, 2004, 8(2): 163-198.
[13] Alarcao, Moreira. Technical rationality and learning by reflecting on action in teacher education: Dichotomy or complement [J]. British Journal of Teacher Education, 1993, 19(4):183-191.
[14] Sternberg, R J, Caruso, R. Practical modes of knowing [A]. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
[15] Freese, A R. Reframing one’s teaching: Discovering our teacher selves through reflection and inquiry [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2006, 22(1): 100-119.
[16] Henderson, J G. Reflective teaching: Becoming an inquiring educator [M]. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992, 1-26.
[17] Warfield, J, Wood, T., & Lehman, J. D. Autonomy, beliefs and the learning of elementary mathematics teachers [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2005, 21(4): 439-456.
[18] Korthagen, F, Wubbels, T. Leaning form practice [A]. In F.Korthagen, J.B.Koster, Lagerwerf & T.Wubbels (Eds.), Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education [M] New Jersey: Lawrener Erlbaum Associates Publications, 2001.
[19] Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher Learning in communities [J]. Review of Research in Education, 1999, 24, 249-305.
[20] Calderhead, J., Gates, P. Conceptualizing reflection in teacher education [M]. Washington,D.C.: The Falmer Press, 1993.
[21] Pedretti, E. Facilitating action research in science, technology and society education: An experience in reflective practice [J]. Educational Action Research, 1960(4): 307-327.
[22] Clandinin, D J. Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom image[J]. Curriculum Inquiry,1985,15(4):361-385
[23] 陈惠邦. 教师行动研究 [M]. 台北:师大书苑,1998.
[24] Fenstermacher, G. D. A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness [A]. In L.Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education[M]. Itasca: F.E. Peacock, 1978.
[25] Grimmett, P., MacKinnon, A., Erickson, G., & Riecken, T. Reflective practice in teacher education [A]. In R.T.Clift, W.R.Houston & M.Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice: An analysis of issues and programmes [M]. New York: Teachers College Press, 1990.
[26] Rodgers, C R. Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection [J]. Harvard Educational Review, 2002, 72(2): 230-253.
[27] Eick, C. Dias, M. Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms [J]. Science Education, 2005, 89(3): 470-491.
[28] Calderhead, J, Gates, P. Conceptualizing reflection in teacher education [M]. Washington,D.C.: The Falmer Press, 1993.
[29] Michael, K, Richards, B. W. Through the looking glass: Some criticisms of reflection[C]. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Education Research Association, San Francisco, 1995, 18th -22th. April.
[30] Sparke-Langer, G., Colton, A. Synthesis of research on teachers’ reflective thinking [J]. Educational Leadership, 1991, 48(6): 37-44.
[31] van Manen, J. Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical [J]. Curriculum Inquiry, 1977(6): 205-208.
[32] Ghaye, A, Ghaye, K. Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice [M]. London: Falmer Press, 1998.
[33] Jay, J K, Johnson, K L. Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2002, 18(1): 73-85.
[34] Connelly, F M, Clandinin, D J. Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience[M]. New York: Teachers College, 1988.
[35] 杨鑫. 解析教师实践知识的来源及生成方式[J]. 当代教育与文化,2017(1):74-80.
[36] Habermas J. Knowledge and Human Interests [M]. Boston: Beacon Press , 1972.
[37] Cochran-Smith, M., Lytle, S. L. Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher Learning in communities [J]. Review of Research in Education, 1999, 24, 249-305.
[38] Gardner, W E. Preface [A]. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher [M]. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1989.
[39] Lytle, S, Cochran-Smith, M. Teacher research as a way of knowing [J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1992, 62, 447-474.
[40] Feiman-Nemser, S., Remillard, J. Perspectives on learning to teach[A]. In F. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
[41] Schön, D A. The new scholarship requires a new epistemology [M]. Change, 1995.
[42] Fenstermacher, G D. The knower and the known: the nature of knowledge in research on teaching[A]. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education [M]. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1994.
[43] Noffke, S. Professional, personal and political dimensions of action research [A]. In M. Apple(Ed.). Review of Research in Education [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
[44] Cochran-Smith, M. Learning to teach for social justice [A]. In G. Griffin (Ed.), 98th yearbook of NSSE: Teacher education for a new century: Emerging perspectives, promising practices, and future possibilities [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
[45] Freire, P. Pedagogy of the oppressed [M]. Harmonds-worth: Penguin, 1972.
[46] Giroux, H A. Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning [M]. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1988.
[47] Liberman, A, Miller, L. Problems and possibilities of institutionalizing teacher research [A]. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Socket (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
[48] Calderhead, J. The nature and growth of knowledge in student teaching [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1991, 7(5-6): 531-535.
[49] Freire, P. Education for critical consciousness [M]. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 1973.
[50] Hart, A W. Effective administration through reflective practice [J]. Education and Urban Society, 1990, 22(2): 153-169.
[51] Griffiths, M,Tann, S. Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories [J]. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1992, 18(1): 69-84.
[52] Handal, G, Lauvas, P. Promoting reflective thinking: Supervision in action [M]. Boston: Open University Press, 1987.
[53] 邹斌, 陈向明. 教师知识概念的溯源 [J]. 课程·教材·教法,2005(6): 85-89.
[54] Brookfield, S D. Becoming a critically reflective teacher [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1995.
[55] Elbaz, F. Critical reflectionon teaching: Insights from Freire [J]. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Teacher Education, 1988, 14(2): 171-181.
[1] 谢登斌, 段苏颖, 谢婷. 民族地区义务教育教师合理流动运行机制及实践规制的建构——新型城镇化背景下的思考[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 56(1): 87-94.
[2] 武永江, 段少帅. 新时代导师语言艺术的育人功能及其培育策略[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(5): 88-95.
[3] 姜添辉. 评论同类型主义:新自由主义构成的制度化脉络以及教师专业实践坐标[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(4): 66-74.
[4] 杜伟珊. 开放大学教师心理资本对工作投入的影响:控制感和工作不安全感的多重中介效应[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(4): 92-100.
[5] 谢登斌, 沈燚佳. 新型城镇化对民族地区义务教育教师合理流动的张力[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(2): 98-104.
[6] 王卓玉, 樊瑞净. 中学STEM教师的TPCK知识结构分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(2): 105-111.
[7] 王彦. “教育之形”与“教育之意”——教师专业发展过程中的“形”“意”之变[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(3): 93-97.
[8] 郑振锋. 民族地区高校教师专业发展多元支持体系的构建——基于利益相关者理论[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(3): 116-121.
[9] 蒲雯, 刘妍. 论民族地区教师的跨文化教育使命及其核心素养[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(2): 109-114.
[10] 黄海波. 论高校教师绩效考核指标体系的科学化——以高校内部的平衡发展为中心[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(2): 115-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] magtech. 测试发布文章[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] magtech. 测试最新录用[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 0, (): 1 .
[3] 陈延斌, 王伟. 传统家礼文献整理、研究的学术史梳理与评析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] 李冰, 陈姝瑾. 《郑氏家仪》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] 朱莉涛. 《茗洲吴氏家典》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] 周良书, 郭文杰. 中共开展党内政治生活的历史与经验[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] 张乾元, 朱倩倩. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的核心要旨[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] 潘瑾菁. 习近平新时代网络意识形态工作思想研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] 瞿久淞, 靳书君. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义话语研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] 邓世平. 乡村振兴:习近平对毛泽东农村发展思想的继承与发展[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发