美国早期干预研究的启示:支持处境不利儿童

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2020.02.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 美国早期干预研究既是政府帮助处境不利儿童的重要手段,也是促进教育公平与社会公平的重要途径。全美已经开展了数百项大型早期干预研究,其中最著名、历史最悠久的处境不利儿童干预项目之一即为“芝加哥亲子中心项目”。我国对处境不利儿童的早期干预研究起步较晚,当前仍以介绍特殊儿童干预研究为主,许多干预研究也缺乏相关政策支持与评估督导。美国早期干预研究的经验可为我国学者支持处境不利儿童的早期干预研究提供以下启示:项目设计需要科学理论指导,项目实施应建构文化适宜的生态干预系统,项目的评估分析则是儿童教育与福利政策制定的科学基础。

关键词: 比较研究, 早期干预, 处境不利儿童, 儿童福利

Abstract: Early intervention research on disadvantaged children deserves attention. In the United States, it serves not only as an important means for the government to help disadvantaged, but also as an crucial approach to promote equality in education and society. Hundreds of large-scale such studies have been carried out in the United States, among which one of the most famous and oldest is "the Chicago Parent-Child Center Program". In China, researches of such sort started late with focus till today on introducing special children intervention and many lack relevant policy support and evaluation supervision. On such an account, American experience enlightens us: 1) the project design needs the guidance of scientific theory; 2) its implementation should build an ecological intervention system with appropriate culture; 3) the evaluation, together with the analysis is the scientific basis for making policies on children's education and welfare.

Key words: comparative study, early intervention, children in disadvantage, child welfare

中图分类号:

钱雨, 何梦瑶. 美国早期干预研究的启示:支持处境不利儿童[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(2): 124-134.

QIAN Yu, HE Meng-yao. Inspirations of Early Intervention Studies in the US: For Children in Disadvantage[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 124-134.

参考文献

[1] Ramey C T, Ramey S L. Prevention of intellectual disabilities: early interventions to improve cognitive development[J]. Preventive Medicine, 1998, 27(2):224-232.
[2] 肖可夫,菲利普斯. 从神经细胞到社会成员:儿童早期发展的科学[M]. 方俊明,李伟亚,译. 南京:南京师范大学出版社, 2007:288,293.
[3] Early Intervention [EB/OL].(2019-4-1)http://www.brighttots.com/early_intervention.html.
[4] Barnett W S. Effectiveness of early educational intervention[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):975-978.
[5] Camilli, Gregory; Vargas, Sadako; Ryan, Sharon; Barnett, W Steven. Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Early Education Interventions on Cognitive and Social Development[J].Teachers College Record,2010,112(3):579-620.
[6] 黄正夫,刘小强. 早期教育经济收益研究新进展[J].外国教育研究,2013(8):37-44.
[7] The Center for High Impact Philanthropy .Child-Parent Centers[EB/OL].(2018-9-1) http://www.impact.upenn.edu/our-analysis/opportunities-to-achieve-impact/early-childhood-toolkit/strategies-for-donors/provide-great-places-to-learn/child-parent-centers/.
[8] Chicago Public Schools. Child Parent Center [EB/OL].(2019-1-10) http://cps.edu/Schools/EarlyChildhood/Pages/Childparentcenter.aspx.
[9] Shutter Stock. Every Student Succeeds Act and Early Learning[EB/OL]. (2019-4-7)http://www.edcentral.org/every-student-succeeds-act-earlylearning/.
[10] 钱雨. 美国学前教育课程评价研究项目的背景、内容、实施及其启示[J]. 学前教育研究, 2011(7):20-25.
[11] Reynolds,A J. Educational Success in High-Risk Settings : Contributions of the Chicago Longitudinal Study[J]. Journal of School Psychology, 1999 , 37 (4) :345-354.
[12] Reynolds A J, Temple J A, Robertson D L, et al. Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers[J]. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 2002, 24(4):267-303.
[13] Heckman J J. Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5782):1900-1902.
[14] U.S. Department of Education. Case Studies of Schools Implementing Early Elementary Strategies: Preschool Through Third Grade Alignment and Differentiated Instruction[R].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service,2016.
[15] Judy A. Temple, Arthur J. Reynolds. Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child–Parent Centers and related programs[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2007, 26(1):126-144.
[16] Rural Education Action Project: REAP Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fsi/wpaper/22567.html. 2019/12/24
[17] Pros and Cons: The Breakdown of Early Intervention Services Through Babies Can’t Wait"[EB/OL].( 2019-4-18) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_childhood_intervention.
[18] 苏雪云,汪海萍,方俊明. 美国早期干预政策的发展:基于婴幼儿脑科学研究的变革[J].全球教育展望,2016(10):121-128.
[19] Ramey C T, Ramey S L. Prevention of intellectual disabilities: early interventions to improve cognitive development.[J]. Preventive Medicine, 1998, 27(2):224-232.
[20] [美]纽曼.学前教育改革与国家反贫困战略——美国的经验[M].李敏谊,霍力岩,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2011.
[21] Gormley WT Jr. From science to policy in early childhood education[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):978-981.
[22] OECD. Education at a Glance 2016[M]. Paris:OECD Publishing,2016.
[23] Heckman J J. Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5782):1900-1902.
[24] 钱雨.全球化视野下的学前教育政策研究[M]. 南京:南京师范大学出版社, 2015:197.

相关文章 12

[1]	李文钊. 行动者中心制度主义:探究政策过程中的互动效应[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(3): 19-42.
[2]	胡重明. 破解公共服务供给失衡困局的项目制路径——基于浙江城市优质医疗资源下沉政策的研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(1): 30-41.
[3]	孙志建. 事中事后监管工具结构创新:五年实践的回顾与展望[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(1): 42-54.
[4]	刘建华, 刘欣怡. 大数据技术的风险问题及其防范机制[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(1): 113-120.
[5]	李文军. 城乡居民基础养老金调整与财政负担测算研究:2016-2050[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2018, 54(1): 35-42.
[6]	宋才发, 彭振. 民族地区精准扶贫的路径抉择及法治保障探讨[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2017, 53(4): 22-27.
[7]	黄竹胜, 陈国华. 论中国宗教事务治理法治化[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2017, 53(2): 36-41.
[8]	周超. 转型期政商关系的治理探析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2017, 53(2): 46-51.
[9]	岳雪莲,李昌. 新型城镇化下西部城市流动人口公共服务供给问题探析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2015, 51(5): 196-200.
[10]	胡锐军,杨卡. 非政府组织在社会冲突治理中的双向功能及其发展路径[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2015, 51(3): 50-55.
[11]	吴晓林. 技术赋能与科层规制——技术治理中的政治逻辑[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 56(2): 73-81.
[12]	颜海娜,王思宁. 基层河长的政策执行力——一项关于政令“最后一公里”的实证分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2019, 55(6): 36-53.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed