广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 75-79.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.05.011

• 骈文研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

梁章钜《退庵论文》的文笔骈散之辨及其意义

张彦   

  1. 广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-10 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2018-07-14
  • 作者简介:张彦(1982—),女,内蒙古满洲里人,广西师范大学副教授,广西师范大学博士后流动站研究人员,文学博士。
  • 基金资助:
    桂学协同创新中心项目,广西博士后专项资助项目“《三管英灵集》研究”(KS392)

The Style Discrimination of Parallel Prose and Prose inTuian Essays by Liang Zhangju and Its Significance

ZHANG Yan   

  1. College of Chinese language and Literature, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2017-05-10 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2018-07-14

摘要: 梁章钜《退庵论文》重提六朝“文笔之辨”,厘清“文”之内涵,意在提高骈文地位,批驳古文家穷经注史、远离文之本质、贬低骈文的观点。较之阮元尊体骈文、否定古文为“文”的矫枉过正,梁章钜通达折中,主张骈文、古文并重,异途同源,骈散结合,不必独尊正统。他反对“以古文为时文”和“以时文为古文”的两相妨害,强调古文和八股时文的互学才能两相成就,较阮元将八股文视为骈文一脉之观点客观公正。梁章钜称《文选》骈体、散体并选,并非骈文选本,批驳古文家对《文选》的轻视。梁章钜骈散结合的文体观调和了清中叶古文、骈文之争,为古文、骈文创作和理论的发展做出了一定贡献。

关键词: 梁章钜, 《退庵论文》, 文笔之辨, 骈文, 古文

Abstract: The style discrimination in the Northern and Southern Dynasties has been brought up again in Tuian Esaays written by Liang Zhangju. He wanted to clarify the connotation of “Wen” in order to improve the status of parallel prose, and refute the view that the ancient prose writers buried themselves in classic works and made annotation of history, kept away from the essence of essays and belittled the parallel prose. Compared with Ruan Yuan Respectful Style of parallel prose, he denied that it was overcorrect that the ancient prose was “Wen”. Liang Zhangju was more reasonable and compromise. He advocated that ancient prose and parallel prose were equally important. There was no need to respect one of them as orthodoxy exclusively. It was inevitable for parallel prose and prose to combine together though they were homogenous but had divergent evolution. Liang Zhangju objected that the two theories “writing ancient prose with the method of eight-legged essays” and “writing eight-legged essays with the method of ancient prose” interfered each other, but emphasized the mutual learning of ancient prose and eight-legged essays. It must have degrees and avoid utilitarian. The words you said from your heart should be substantial in content. Only in this way can both of them make achievements. Compared with Ruan Yuan who regarded eight-legged essays as the same stream of parallel prose and both as orthodox of orthodox writing, Liang Zhangju’s comments were objective and fair. Liang Zhangju believed Literary Selections selected both parallel style and prose style, it was not the anthology of parallel prose. He also refuted the ancient prose writers who despised Literary Selections. Liang Zhangju’s theory of prose are a reconciliation of contradictions between the parallel prose and ancient prose in the Mid-Qing Dynasty, which have made a certain contribution to the creation and good theoretical development of ancient essay, parallel prose and eight-legged essay.

Key words: Liang Zhangju, Tuian Essays, style discrimination, parallel prose, ancient prose

中图分类号: 

  • I206.2
[1] (清)梁章钜.退庵随笔[M].扬州:江苏广陵古籍刻印社,1997.
[2] 王水照.历代文话·退庵论文(第五册)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007.
[3] 杨旭辉.清代骈文史[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.
[4] (清)程廷祚.青溪集[M].合肥:黄山书社,2004.
[5] (清)李塨.恕谷后集[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[6] 陈志扬.阮元骈文观嬗变及历史意义[C]//阮锡安,姚正根.阮元研究论文选(下册).扬州:广陵书社,2014.
[7] (清)梁章钜.文选旁证[M].穆克宏,校.福州:福建人民出版社,2000.
[8] 於梅舫.阮元文笔说的发轫与用意[C]//阮锡安,姚正根.阮元研究论文选(下册).扬州:广陵书社,2014.
[9] (清)姚鼐.古文辞类纂[M].胡士明,李祚唐,校.上海:上海古籍出版社,1998.
[10] (清)阮元.揅经室集[M].邓经元,校.北京:中华书局,1993.
[1] 于景祥,胡佩杰. 论明代中期文学批评中公正对待六朝骈文的倾向——以杨慎、王文禄为中心[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(4): 72-76.
[2] 孟飞. 从“链体”结构看陆贽骈文的功能突破[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(4): 77-85.
[3] 贺玉洁. 论《四六灿花》的选文宗旨及其骈文批评[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(4): 100-105.
[4] 王正刚. 骈文复兴视域下的清代骈文文集序跋[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(4): 106-114.
[5] 李生龙. 骈文之辨体及其与句格、风格之关系[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(5): 50-57.
[6] 熊礼汇. 试论李白骈文的美感特质[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(5): 58-67.
[7] 张明强. 论清初骈文家地理分布与地域骈文流派[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(5): 68-74.
[8] 谢海林. 曾国藩与桐城派古文家梅曾亮之关系发微[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(4): 78-85.
[9] 张彦. 论《三管英灵集》的收录标准[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(6): 12-16.
[10] 钟涛. 论六朝政治运作与骈文书写的互动[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 67-71.
[11] 刘涛. 用典技巧演进与南朝骈文形式[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 72-79.
[12] 刘城. 文学接受视野下的韩柳与骈文——以宋至清代为讨论中心[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 80-85.
[13] 张明强. 学术思潮与清初骈文的新气象[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 86-91.
[14] 路海洋. 论清代江南骈文的偏胜及其原因[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 92-98.
[15] 张作栋. 从四六到骈文——论骈文的名称演进与文体辨析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 99-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] magtech. 测试发布文章[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] 王天根. 大数据时代的珍稀史料考释及史学价值所在——大英图书馆藏 “发信件簿”数据化处理及其反映清帝国通讯之侧影[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 1 -11 .
[3] 刘威. 不列颠博物馆藏嘉兴协防务呈文考释[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 12 -17 .
[4] 包大为. 作为危机理论的历史唯物主义:三个问题向度[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 23 -28 .
[5] 刘吉发, 何梦焕. 习近平生态政治观的多维透视[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 29 -34 .
[6] 李文军. 城乡居民基础养老金调整与财政负担测算研究:2016-2050[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 35 -42 .
[7] 潘悟云, 王奕桦, 葛佳琦. 中韩两国古代文化交流的印证——语言学视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 76 -83 .
[8] 赵燕华, 郭小凡, 赵明. 基于复杂网络的汉越动物词语认知属性对比研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 84 -90 .
[9] 李玉. 上古汉语“迫”词族略考——汉语方言及亲属语言同源词比较研究与原始汉语**mb-型复声母的构拟[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(1): 91 -96 .
[10] 钟瑞添, 李旭华. 论马克思主义的现实价值[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(6): 1 -11 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发